| Literature DB >> 24741344 |
N Othman1, S K Kamarudin2, M S Takriff2, M I Rosli2, E M F Engku Chik3, M A K Adnan3.
Abstract
Radiotracer experiments are carried out in order to determine the mean residence time (MRT) as well as percentage of dead zone, V dead (%), in an integrated mixer consisting of Rushton and pitched blade turbine (PBT). Conventionally, optimization was performed by varying one parameter and others were held constant (OFAT) which lead to enormous number of experiments. Thus, in this study, a 4-factor 3-level Taguchi L9 orthogonal array was introduced to obtain an accurate optimization of mixing efficiency with minimal number of experiments. This paper describes the optimal conditions of four process parameters, namely, impeller speed, impeller clearance, type of impeller, and sampling time, in obtaining MRT and V dead (%) using radiotracer experiments. The optimum conditions for the experiments were 100 rpm impeller speed, 50 mm impeller clearance, Type A mixer, and 900 s sampling time to reach optimization.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24741344 PMCID: PMC3967391 DOI: 10.1155/2014/242658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
The value of level of selected parameters in this study.
| Factors | F1: type mixer | F2: impeller speed (rpm) | F3: impeller clearance (mm) | F4: sampling time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | A | 100 | 50 | 700 |
| Level 2 | B | 150 | 75 | 800 |
| Level 3 | — | 200 | 100 | 900 |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of Type A mixing vessel rig for radiotracer experimentation.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of Type B mixer.
Figure 3Determination of mean residence time (MRT).
The application of L9 (34) Taguchi orthogonal array has produced nine numbers of experimental runs.
| Experiments | F1: type mixer | F2: impeller speed (mm) | F3: impeller clearance (rpm) | F4: sampling time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Level 1 | Level 1 | Level 1 | Level 1 |
| 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 2 | Level 2 |
| 3 | Level 1 | Level 3 | Level 3 | Level 3 |
| 4 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
| 5 | Level 2 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 |
| 6 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| 7 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 3 | Level 2 |
| 8 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 3 |
| 9 | Level 3 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
The summarized results of MRT and V dead.
| Experiments | Number of runs | MRT (s) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1A | 154.25 | 1.58 |
| 2 | 3A | 136.40 | 12.97 |
| 3 | 5A | 151.54 | 3.31 |
| 4 | 7A | 156.17 | 0.35 |
| 5 | 8A | 141.31 | 9.83 |
| 6 | 2B | 128.78 | 18.60 |
| 7 | 4B | 129.85 | 18.14 |
| 8 | 6B | 131.38 | 17.0 |
| 9 | 9B | 134.57 | 14.30 |
The means of each level for four factors.
| Parameters | Factors | A: type mixer | B: impeller speed (mm) | C: impeller clearance (rpm) | D: sampling time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRT (s) | Level 1 | 147.40 | 146.76 | 142.38 | 143.38 |
| Level 2 | 142.09 | 136.36 | 138.14 | 131.68 | |
| Level 3 | 131.93 | 138.30 | 140.9 | 146.36 | |
|
| |||||
|
| Level 1 | 5.95 | 6.69 | 9.21 | 8.57 |
| Level 2 | 9.59 | 13.27 | 12.39 | 16.57 | |
| Level 3 | 16.48 | 12.07 | 10.43 | 6.89 | |
Figure 4Effects of impeller speed on RTD.
ANOVA results for radiotracer experiments.
| Factors | SS | d.o.f. | Mean square | %contribution | Prob > |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) MRT (s) | |||||
| Type mixer | 661.95 | 1 | 661.95 | 70.19 | 0.0069 |
| Speed | 197.89 | 2 | 98.95 | 20.98 | 0.0476 |
| Clearance | 38.32 | 2 | 19.16 | 4.06 | 0.0314 |
| Time | 29.86 | 2 | 14.93 | 1.60 | 0.0338 |
| Std. deviation | 3.87 | ||||
|
| 0.9524 | ||||
| Mean | 140.47 | ||||
|
| |||||
| (2) | |||||
| Type mixer | 301.95 | 1 | 301.95 | 71.68 | 0.0087 |
| Speed (rpm) | 79.16 | 2 | 39.58 | 18.79 | 0.0440 |
| Clearance | 20.34 | 2 | 10.17 | 4.83 | 0.0337 |
| Time | 131.39 | 2 | 6.59 | 3.13 | 0.0419 |
| Std. deviation | 2.76 | ||||
|
| 0.9448 | ||||
| Mean | 10.53 | ||||
Parameter setting and results obtained from confirmation experiment.
| Type mixer | Clearance (mm) | Speed (rpm) | Sampling time (s) | MRT (s) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-L1 | 50-L1 | 100-L1 | 900-L3 | 156.05 | 0.39 |
| B | 50 | 100 | 900 | 139.44 | 11.87 |
Comparisons of current technique using Taguchi method and other method.
| Authors | Method | Parameters | Results | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| MRT | MRT |
| ||
| Current study | Integrated mixer | 100 | 50 | 350 | 21.8 | 5 | 156.72 | 156.05 | 0.39 |
| [ | Single Rushton | 288 | — | 145 | 114 | 0.53 | 2.64 | 2.445 | 7.4 |
| [ | Four stirrer paddles | — | — | 800 | 300 | 525 | — | 3420 | — |
| [ | Multibladed T-type blade | 50 | — | 2 m | 0.186 m | 30 | — | 426.36 | — |
| [ | Jet mixing | — | — | — | 1.92 | 356 | 363 | ! | |
S: speed, C: clearance, H: height, D: diameter, Q: volumetric flow rates, MRT: mean residence time, theo: theoretical, and exp: experimental.