Literature DB >> 24741327

Cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer mortality among 602,242 Norwegian males and females.

Ranjan Parajuli1, Eivind Bjerkaas1, Aage Tverdal2, Loïc Le Marchand3, Elisabete Weiderpass4, Inger T Gram5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the main cancer types, with high incidence and mortality in Norway. We examined the association between different measures of smoking exposure and CRC mortality overall and by subsite in a large Norwegian cohort.
METHODS: We followed 602,242 participants from four Norwegian health surveys, aged 19-67 years at enrollment between 1972 and 2003 by linkage to the national registries through December 2007. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by smoking categories for different CRC endpoints.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 14 years, 2,333 Norwegian males and females died of CRC (60% men). Male and female ever smokers had a 20% (HR 1.23, CI 1.08-1.40 and HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06-1.40, respectively) increased risk of death from CRC compared with sex-specific never smokers. For proximal colon cancer mortality, female ever smokers had a 50% (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.20-1.87) increased risk compared with female never smokers. The increased risk of rectal cancer mortality was about 40% higher for male ever smokers (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.81) compared with male never smokers. A test for heterogeneity by sex showed an increased risk of rectal cancer mortality among men which was significant for former smokers (Wald χ(2) =0.02) and an increased risk of proximal colon cancer mortality among women which was significant for ever and former smokers (Wald χ(2) =0.02 and χ(2) =0.04, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Smoking is associated with increased CRC mortality in both sexes. The risk of rectal and proximal colon cancer mortality was most pronounced among male and female smokers respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Norway; cigarette smoking; cohort study; colorectal cancer; mortality; sex

Year:  2014        PMID: 24741327      PMCID: PMC3984060          DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S58722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 1179-1349            Impact factor:   4.790


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for 8% of all cancer deaths, making it the fourth most common cause of death from cancer worldwide.1 CRC is the second most common cause of cancer death in Europe.2 Worldwide, mortality rates are lower in women than in men except in the Caribbean region.1 In Norway, the incidence of CRC is the second highest after breast cancer among women and third highest after lung and prostate cancer in men. The 5-year incidence of CRC was 43 for men and 35 for women per 100,000 person-years in 2007 to 2011, which is adjusted to the world population. However, the mortality rate for CRC ranks third among men after lung and prostate cancer and second among women after lung cancer.3 Cigarette smoking is the major preventable and modifiable cause of death worldwide.4 The World Health Organization has reported that almost 100 million deaths were caused by cigarette smoking in the 20th century, and if this trend continues, another one billion smoking-related deaths are expected in the 21st century.5 Presently, smoking is attributed to approximately 6 million premature deaths annually worldwide. If prevention measures are not implemented soon, the death toll is expected to reach 8 million per year by 2030. The casual association between cigarette smoking and CRC was recently re-evaluated by an expert group from the International Agency for Research on Cancer,6 with the conclusion that smoking is a risk factor for both colon and rectal cancer. It has been proposed that about 12% of CRC deaths are attributable to smoking.7,8 The prevalence of smoking in Norway for men was about 52% in 1973; by 2007, there had been more than a 50% reduction to 24%. The proportion of women smokers remained at around 30% from 1973 to 2002. After 2002, there was a substantial decline in women who smoked daily, and the prevalence of women smokers was similar to that of men by 2007.9–11 We have previously reported that the increased risk of colon cancer due to cigarette smoking may be greater in women than in men.12 The main purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the association between cigarette smoking and CRC mortality in a large Norwegian cohort. We also wanted to investigate if the association differed by sex.

Materials and methods

Study population

Our study included 652,792 subjects (49% men) who participated in several Norwegian health surveys (the Oslo study I, the Norwegian Counties study, the 40 years cohort, and the Cohort of Norway [CONOR]). These surveys were conducted between 1972 and 2003, and were merged into one database which constitutes the basis of the present study. Our study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics South-East Norway. Detailed information on the study population can be found elsewhere.12,13

Exposure information

All surveys had a baseline questionnaire that included a detailed assessment of smoking habits, physical activity, and other lifestyle factors. The questionnaires included questions on current and former smoking habits, smoking duration, and average number of cigarettes smoked per day; some also asked about age at smoking initiation. Current smokers were defined as those who were daily smokers, and former smokers were classified according to years since quitting smoking, or if they answered that they had smoked previously, but were not smokers at the time of enrollment. Current and former smokers were also classified as ever smokers, and categorized according to the following factors at enrollment: age at smoking initiation, average number of cigarettes smoked per day, smoking duration in years, and number of pack-years (ie, number of cigarettes smoked per day, divided by 20, multiplied by the duration of smoking, in years). Only the CONOR study asked about the age at smoking initiation. In other surveys, we calculated age at smoking initiation for both current (ie, age at enrollment minus duration of smoking, in years) and for former smokers (age at quitting smoking minus duration of smoking, in years). Participants who were neither current nor former smokers were classified as never smokers. Body mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height, in meters. The participants were categorized into three groups based on the level of physical activity reported in the baseline questionnaires: a sedentary group (reading, watching television, and sedentary activity <4 hours a week); a moderate group (walking, bicycling, or similar activities ≥4 hours a week); and a heavy physical activity group (heavy exercise and daily competitive sports, and light sports, or heavy gardening ≥4 hours a week). Information regarding duration of education was obtained from Statistics Norway and participants were assigned to one of the three categories by duration of education, ie, less than 10 years, 10–12 years, and 13 or more years.

Follow-up and endpoints

The participants were linked to the Cancer Registry of Norway, the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, and the Central Population Register. The unique 11-digit personal identification number was utilized to identify all cancer deaths and emigration respectively. The national registries contain correct and detailed information regarding cancer incidence and mortality.14 CRC mortality was classified according to the ninth and tenth revisions of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases. Follow-up ended at the time of death from primary CRC cancer, death from any other cancer (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin), emigration, death from other causes, or December 31, 2007, whichever occurred first. We excluded 11,476 subjects who were diagnosed with any invasive cancer prior to the start of the study, and 1,009 subjects who emigrated or died before the start of follow-up. We further excluded 6,299 subjects with insufficient information on smoking history. Finally, we excluded those with missing information on body mass index (n=5,107), physical activity (n=8,210), or education (n=18,449), leaving 602,242 (49.7% men) in the analytical cohort.

Statistical analysis

We used Student’s t-test and χ test to investigate the distribution of selected characteristics between current and never smokers. All analyses were conducted separately by sex. The Cox proportional hazards model was used with age as the underlying time scale to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between different measures of smoking exposure and colorectal, colon, and rectal cancer deaths with never smokers as the reference group. Entry time was defined as age at enrollment and exit time was age at death, emigration, or end of follow-up (December 31, 2007), whichever occurred first. The ever smoking variables were analyzed separately for males and females. These were: age at smoking initiation in years (≤19, 20–24, ≥25), numbers of cigarettes smoked per day (1–9, 10–19, ≥20), smoking duration in years (1–19, 20–29, ≥30), and number of pack-years (0–9, 10–19, ≥20). Possible confounders included in the final models, selected a priori, were age (continuous), level of physical activity (sedentary, moderate, heavy), and body mass index (continuous) at enrollment, and years of education (<10 years, 10–12 years, ≥13 years). Tests for linear trends were obtained by creating an ordinal exposure variable with equally spaced scores and including it in the models, and we performed the trend tests with never smokers included. We reanalyzed the data excluding the 8,151 (99% men) subjects who reported smoking only cigars or a pipe. We had information on alcohol consumption for 37% (n=221,748) of participants. We undertook sensitivity analyses by sex for the main outcomes based on this population (49% men) enrolled after 1995. Heterogeneity by sex with regard to the effect of smoking and risk of CRC mortality was tested with the Wald χ. Two-sided P-values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using STATA version 12.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

During a mean 14 years of follow-up and 8.6 million person-years of observation, there were 2,333 CRC deaths (60% men) of which 1,607 were from colon cancer (57% men) and 726 from rectal cancer (67% men). Table 1 shows that the 40 years cohort was the largest study, contributing 64% of participants and 37% of CRC deaths. The mean age at enrollment varied from 40 years in the Norwegian counties study to 48 years in the CONOR study. About 63% of all the participants were ever smokers at enrollment. For both sexes and in all surveys, current smokers had a shorter duration of education, were less physically active, and had a lower body mass index compared with never smokers (all P-values <0.0001, data not shown).
Table 1

Selected characteristics of the study population, stratified by cohort, among 602,242 Norwegian males and females (1972–2003) at enrollment

CharacteristicsOslo study Ia (1972–1973)3336Norwegian counties study (1974–1987)363940 years cohort (1985–1999)36, 40, 41CONOR study (1994–2003)36,42,43All (1972–2003)
Subjects16,94683,486384,767117,043602,242
Person-years of follow-up475,8342,131,8714,985,334968,2938,561,332
Age (years, mean, SD)45±640±743±548±1444±8
Age at CRC diagnosis among casesb (mean, SD)68±863±957±1068±1262±11
Age at death, all causesb (mean, SD)70±864±961±1376±1366±12
Age at CRC deathsb (mean, SD)70±764±860±1273±1265±11
CRC deaths (n)3887238603622,333
Colon cancer deaths (n)2384686242771,607
Rectal cancer deaths (n)15025523685726
Year of birth, median (IQR)1928 (1925–1931)1938 (1932–1944)1950 (1948–1954)1950 (1941–1960)1950 (1944–1954)
Follow-up years, median (IQR)32 (24–33)29 (20–30)13 (10–16)9 (6–10)13 (9–17)
≥13 years of educationb (%)2413242122
Body mass index (kg/m2, mean, SD)25±325±425±426±425±4
Level of physical activity, heavyc (%)2021283328
Smoking status
 Never smokers (%)2136364137
 Ever smokers (%)7964645963

Notes:

Included only men

not at enrollment

heavy physical activity, ie, light sports or heavy gardening ≥4 hours per week, heavy exercise, or daily competitive sports.

Abbreviations: CRC, colorectal cancer; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range.

Table 2 shows that male ever smokers had a 23% increased risk of dying from CRC (HR 1.23, CI 1.08–1.40) and male ever smokers included in the Norwegian counties study had an approximately 40% increased risk of CRC death (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.12–1.89). The risk estimates for cigarette smoking and CRC death in male ever smokers did not reveal any significant results for other surveys compared with study-specific male never smokers. By survey, the trend test was significant for different smoking exposures and CRC mortality in men (except for age at smoking initiation) only in the Norwegian counties study.
Table 2

Multivariatea adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for colorectal cancer mortality among men (n=299,376), according to various measures of smoking exposure at enrollment, by surveys (1972–2003) with never smokers as the reference group

Smoking exposureOslo study I (1972–1973)3336n=16,946
Norwegian counties study (1974–1987)3639 n=41,913
40 years cohort (1985–1999)36, 40, 41n=185,037
CONOR study (1994–2003)36,42,43n=55,480
All (1972–2003)n=299,376
Casesn=388HR95% CICasesn=396HR95% CICasesn=442HR95% CICasesn=181HR95% CICases n=1,407HR95% CI
Smoking status
Never721.00Ref721.00Ref1161.00Ref471.00Ref3071.00Ref
Former1011.080.80–1.471101.411.04–1.901581.200.94–1.54930.990.70–1.434621.201.03–1.38
Current2151.250.96–1.652141.491.13–1.951681.210.95–1.55410.930.61–1.436381.271.10–1.46
P-trendb0.081<0.050.1340.759<0.05
Ever3161.190.91–1.543241.461.12–1.893261.210.97–1.501340.970.70–1.371,1001.231.08–1.40
Ever smokersc
 Age at smoking initiatio n (years)
  ≥25591.110.78–1.57271.380.88–2.14311.220.81–1.83201.320.78–2.241371.251.02–1.53
  20–24611.390.97–1.99611.410.99–1.99491.110.80–1.56280.700.44–1.131991.180.98–1.41
  ≤19821.350.97–1.891251.541.15–2.08981.190.90–1.57821.030.71–1.483871.261.08–1.47
  P-trendb0.5190.0830.2290.919<0.05
 Cigarettes per day (n)
  1–9801.070.77–1.47721.421.02–1.97621.160.85–1.60350.840.54–1.312491.140.97–1.36
  10–191631.351.01–1.761601.451.10–1.931501.160.91–1.49521.020.68–1.605251.271.10–1.46
  ≥20601.150.81–1.62841.631.18–2.23961.220.93–1.61341.230.80–1.942741.291.10–1.53
  P-trendb0.124<0.050.1420.329<0.0001
 Years of smoking (n)
  1–19801.190.87–1.641051.340.98–1.81931.010.77–1.33291.080.68–1.723071.130.96–1.32
  20–291181.120.83–1.491581.511.14–2.001521.230.96–1.57200.740.44–1.254481.221.05–1.41
  ≥301051.411.02–1.93601.621.12–2.34761.571.10–2.24801.010.70–1.473211.401.18–1.66
  P-trendb0.066<0.05<0.050.894<0.0001
 Pack-years of smokingd (n)
  0–9941.150.84–1.56941.300.96–1.77881.120.85–1.48290.940.59–1.513051.140.98–1.34
  10–191021.190.88–1.611341.521.14–2.031151.180.90–1.53200.600.34–0.983711.191.02–1.39
  ≥201071.340.99–1.83881.731.25–2.371041.250.95–1.65691.320.90–1.923681.411.21–1.65
  P-trendb0.062<0.00010.0950.235<0.0001

Notes:

Adjusted for age, body mass index, level of physical activity at enrollment, and duration of education

never smokers included in the model

total numbers of ever smokers do not equal the total numbers in different smoking exposures due to missing data in the different smoking exposure groups

pack-years were calculated as number of cigarettes smoked per day, divided by 20 and multiplied by the number of years of smoking.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazards ratio; Ref, never smokers group.

Table 3 shows that women who were ever smokers had a 22% increased risk of death from CRC (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06–1.40) when compared with female never smokers. Female ever smokers included in the Norwegian counties study had a significant 30% increased risk of death from CRC (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05–1.64). As in men, the risk estimates for cigarette smoking and CRC death in female ever smokers were not significant for other surveys compared with study-specific female never smokers. By survey, the trend test was significant for different smoking exposure and CRC mortality only for women in the Norwegian counties study.
Table 3

Multivariatea adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for colorectal cancer mortality among women (n=302,866), according to various measures of smoking exposure at enrollment, by surveys (1974–2003) with never smokers as the reference group

Smoking exposureNorwegian counties study (1974–1987) 3639n=41,573
40 years cohort (1985–1999) 36,40,41n=199,730
CONOR study (1994–2003) 36,42,43n=61,563
All (1972–2003)n=302,866
Casesn=327HR95% CICasesn=418HR95% CICasesn=181HR95% CICasesn=926HR95% CI
Smoking status
Never1471.00Ref1721.00Ref981.00Ref4171.00Ref
Former441.170.84–1.64771.050.80–1.38411.010.70–1.471621.080.90–1.30
Current1361.381.08–1.751691.301.03–1.63421.120.76–1.653471.301.12–1.52
P-trendb<0.05<0.050.605<0.05
Ever1801.321.05–1.642461.200.98–1.47831.060.78–1.445091.221.06–1.40
Ever smokersc
 Age at smoking initiation (years)
  ≥25511.220.89–1.69481.320.96–1.82291.190.78–1.811281.251.02–1.52
  20–24531.631.18–2.24621.320.97–1.80180.830.50–1.391331.311.07–1.61
  ≤19321.310.88–1.96681.140.83–1.55311.090.69–1.721311.200.97–1.48
  P-trendb<0.05<0.050.673<0.05
 Cigarettes per day (n)
  1–9821.270.97–1.67701.090.82–1.44320.820.54–1.231841.100.92–1.31
  10–19801.300.99–1.721371.281.01–1.63411.400.95–2.072581.311.12–1.55
  ≥20181.681.03–2.75381.200.84–1.7361.010.44–2.34621.290.99–2.70
  P-trendb<0.050.0610.278<0.05
 Years of smoking (n)
  1–19941.210.93–1.581101.240.97–1.60251.110.70–1.762291.211.02–1.43
  20–29791.471.10–1.931151.130.87–1.46231.170.72–1.892171.271.07–1.51
  ≥3071.380.64–2.98201.310.80–2.12290.940.61–1.44561.110.83–1.48
  P-trendb<0.050.1680.970<0.05
 Pack-years of smokingd (n)
  0–91051.210.94–1.56981.060.82–1.36310.950.63–1.442341.090.93–1.29
  10–19621.521.12–2.051031.321.01–1.71281.200.77–1.871931.381.15–1.65
  ≥20131.490.84–2.64441.411.00–1.98160.980.57–1.68731.321.03–1.70
  P-trendb<0.05<0.050.749<0.0001

Notes:

Adjusted for age, body mass index, level of physical activity at enrollment, and duration of education

never smokers included in the model

total numbers of ever smokers do not equal the total numbers in different smoking exposures due to missing data in different smoking exposure groups

pack-years were calculated as number of cigarettes smoked per day, divided by 20 and multiplied by the number of years of smoking.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazards ratio; Ref, never smokers group.

Table 4 shows that the risk of death from rectal cancer was about 40% higher for male ever smokers (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14–1.81) compared with male never smokers. The risk estimates for smoking and colon cancer mortality and by location did not reveal any significant results among male ever smokers compared with male never smokers. The trend tests across different smoking exposure categories including never smokers as the reference group for age at smoking initiation, numbers of cigarettes smoked per day, numbers of years of smoking, and number of pack-years all yielded significant results for rectal cancer mortality among men (P<0.05, Table 4).
Table 4

Multivariatea adjusted HR estimates for colorectal cancer mortality by subsite and location with 95% CIs among men (n=299,376) according to various measures of smoking exposure at enrollment, compared with never smokers

Colon cancer deaths
Proximal colon cancer deaths
Distal colon cancer deaths
Rectal cancer deaths
n=922HR95% CIn=416HR95% CIn=320HR95% CIn=485HR95% CI
Smoking status
Never2151.00Ref1031.00Ref771.00921.00Ref
Former3111.130.95–1.351310.990.76–1.281231.290.97–1.731511.331.02–1.73
Current3961.160.98–1.371821.080.84–1.381201.030.77–1.382421.521.19–1.94
P-trendb0.090.500.99<0.05
Ever7071.150.98–1.343131.040.83–1.302431.140.88–1.483931.431.14–1.81
Ever smokersc
 Age at smoking initiation (years)
  ≥25831.090.84–1.41360.980.67–1.45301.160.76–1.79541.621.15–2.27
  20–241321.140.92–1.42550.980.70–1.37421.040.71–1.52671.270.92–1.74
  ≤192551.211.00–1.461251.240.95–1.62761.010.73–1.401321.371.04–1.80
  P-trendb0.380.8180.517<0.05
 Cigarettes per day (n)
  1–91581.050.85–1.29700.940.69–1.28601.180.84–1.67911.371.02–1.84
  10–193361.180.99–1.401511.080.84–1.401021.040.77–1.401891.471.14–1.89
  ≥201811.231.01–1.50761.090.81–1.47691.310.94–1.82931.451.08–1.94
  P-trendb<0.050.4160.237<0.05
 Years of smoking (n)
  1–191951.050.86–1.27890.990.74–1.31741.130.82–1.561121.311.00–1.74
  20–292851.130.95–1.361170.950.73–1.251041.210.89–1.631631.411.09–1.83
  ≥302131.291.06–1.591011.270.94–1.71621.080.75–1.541081.661.23–2.24
  P-trendb<0.050.2610.454<0.05
 Pack-years of smokingd (n)
  0–91941.060.87–1.29941.050.79–1.40741.160.84–1.601111.331.01–1.77
  10–192351.100.91–1.33940.900.68–1.19771.050.76–1.441361.401.07–1.83
  ≥202441.331.10–1.611091.230.93–1.63801.260.91–1.741241.591.21–2.10
  P-trendb<0.050.2980.255<0.05

Notes:

Adjusted for age, body mass index, level of physical activity at enrollment, and duration of education

never smokers included in the model

total numbers of ever smokers do not equal the total numbers in different smoking exposures due to missing data in different smoking exposure groups

pack-years were calculated as number of cigarettes smoked per day, divided by 20 and multiplied by the number of years of smoking.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazards ratio; Ref, never smokers group.

Table 5 shows that female ever smokers had a 26% increased risk of death from colon cancer (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08–1.48) when compared with female never smokers. Female ever smokers had an almost 50% increased risk of death from proximal colon cancer (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.20–1.87). The risk estimates for female ever smokers were not significant for distal colon cancer or rectal cancer deaths when compared with female never smokers. The trend tests across different smoking exposure categories including never smokers as the reference group for age at smoking initiation, numbers of cigarettes smoked per day, numbers of years of smoking, and number of pack-years all yielded significant results for colon cancer and proximal colon cancer mortality among women (P<0.05, Table 5).
Table 5

Multivariatea adjusted HR estimates for colorectal cancer mortality by subsite and location with 95% CIs among women (n=302,866) according to various measures of smoking exposure at enrollment, compared with never smokers

Colon cancer deaths
Proximal colon cancer deaths
Distal colon cancer deaths
Rectal cancer deaths
n=685HR95% CIn=356HR95% CIn=220HR95% CIn=241HR95% CI
Smoking status
Never3071.00Ref1461.00Ref1061.00Ref1101.00Ref
Former1321.210.98–1.49741.461.10–1.94411.030.72–1.49300.740.50–1.11
Current2461.301.09–1.551361.521.19–1.95731.040.76–1.421011.301.00–1.74
P-trendb<0.05<0.050.780.10
Ever3781.261.08–1.482101.491.20–1.871141.040.79–1.361311.090.84–1.42
Ever smokersc
 Age at smoking initiation (years)
  ≥25951.281.02–1.61491.350.97–1.87331.330.90–1.98331.160.78–1.72
  20–24951.321.04–1.67491.471.05–2.05331.200.80–1.79381.300.89–1.90
  ≤19941.220.95–1.56571.631.17–2.26210.670.41–1.09371.150.77–1.71
  P-trendb<0.05<0.050.1310.24
 Cigarettes per day (n)
  1–91401.160.95–1.42761.320.99–1.75441.040.73–1.48440.940.66–1.33
  10–191851.321.09–1.59991.521.16–1.99601.140.81–1.58731.290.94–1.75
  ≥20481.401.02–1.91311.991.33–2.96100.740.38–1.43141.020.58–1.79
  P-trendb 0.05 0.00010.9680.257
 Years of smoking (n)
  1–191751.291.06–1.57941.511.15–1.98561.110.79–1.55541.000.71–1.40
  20–291551.281.04–1.57881.571.18–2.07481.060.74–1.52621.230.89–1.71
  ≥30411.100.78–1.54241.290.82–2.0290.740.40–1.51151.130.64–1.00
  P-trendb<0.05<0.050.8480.262
 Pack-years of smokingd (n)
  0–91781.160.96–1.40971.331.03–1.74571.020.73–1.42560.930.67–1.29
  10–191401.401.14–1.73721.531.14–2.05481.290.91–1.85531.300.93–1.83
  ≥20511.280.95–1.73351.861.28–2.7180.550.26–1.12221.420.89–2.25
  P-trendb<0.05<0.00010.8830.069

Notes:

Adjusted for age, body mass index, level of physical activity at enrollment, and duration of education

never smokers included in the model

total numbers of ever smokers do not equal the total numbers in different smoking exposures due to missing data in different smoking exposure groups

pack-years were calculated as number of cigarettes smoked per day, divided by 20 and multiplied by the number of years of smoking.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazards ratio; Ref, never smokers group.

These estimates did not differ materially when we excluded only cigar and pipe smokers from the analyses (data not shown). In the sensitivity analyses, the risk estimates of CRC mortality for ever smokers decreased among men (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.60–1.18) and stayed basically the same although were no longer significant among women (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.89–1.74). Altogether, 86% of total CRC mortality cases and 78% of all follow-up were lost when we carried out analyses only for participants with information on alcohol use (data not shown). A test for heterogeneity by sex was also significant for former smoking and risk of rectal cancer (Wald χ, P=0.02), with a pronounced risk in men. Further, this test for heterogeneity by sex was statistically significant, showing increased risk among former, and ever smoking women and risk of proximal colon cancer mortality. The Wald test for heterogeneity was borderline significant for current smokers (Wald χ, P=0.054).

Discussion

Our study shows that both male and female ever smokers have an increased risk of CRC mortality. There was a significantly increased risk of mortality from rectal cancer among male smokers and a significantly increased risk of mortality from colon cancer (mainly of the proximal colon) in female smokers. The increased mortality risk for CRC overall was somewhat more pronounced for current smokers than for former smokers in both males and females. Our study is a large, nationwide, prospective cohort study with virtually complete follow-up, and contains a large proportion of male and female ever smokers. Similarly, the longer follow-up period gives us more stable risk estimates. Smoking history was accessed at enrollment, which minimizes recall bias. We also consider it to be a strength that we focused our analyses on comparisons between ever smokers and never smokers. We have previously reported an increased incidence of colon and rectal cancer among males and females who were ever smokers from the same cohort.12 The study has several limitations. The information on smoking habits was only available at baseline and not during follow-up. Further, around 10% of Norwegian males and females are occasional smokers,10 and we lacked information on passive smoking. Ever smokers have an increased risk of dying from other smoking-related diseases15,16 during follow-up due to competing risks for mortality. This could have decreased the impact of smoking and CRC mortality more among ever smokers compared with never smokers. Those who were occasional or passive smokers in our study are most likely included in the reference group, ie, the never smoker group, which might have biased our results by decreasing the risk estimates. We lacked information on alcohol consumption for the majority of our study participants, and alcohol is an established risk factor for CRC.17 Alcohol consumption in Norway is higher among men than women,18 and lack of adjustment for alcohol consumption could have inflated our risk estimations, especially for men. Interpretation of our subcohort findings indicated that men are more prone than women to the effects of alcohol, and this could be due to the fact that alcohol consumption is higher among men than women in Norway,18 and they also suggest that women are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of smoking. Our subcohort results should be interpreted caution due to the fact that it included very few cases and any conclusions drawn need to be replicated in a larger sample size and with more detailed information on alcohol consumption. We also lacked information on tumor staging and molecular data. Our findings are in agreement with two recent meta-analyses19,20 that reported a strong association between cigarette smoking and risk of CRC mortality. As in our study, these meta-analyses also reported a higher CRC mortality risk for current smokers than for former smokers. Our risk estimates for colon and rectal cancer mortality were also higher among current smokers than in former smokers; these results are in accordance with a study reported by Botteri et al.19 The risk of dying from proximal colon cancer was higher among women in our cohort, and this could be due to the fact that women in our study were at increased risk for proximal colon cancer compared with men.12 The observed higher site-specific increased mortality risk could be a reflection of site-specific CRC risk in our cohort. Previous studies that included both males and females by different smoking status have shown significantly increased risk estimates for CRC mortality among both current and former smokers21,22 and among current smokers alone.23 Further, two of these studies also reported an association between smoking and risk of CRC mortality by sex and showed a significantly increased risk of CRC mortality both for former and current smokers21 and for current smokers alone,23 among both males and females. Few studies examining the association of smoking and risk of CRC mortality among men by subsite found a significantly increased risk of both colon and rectal cancer mortality,24 while other studies found in significant increased risk of colon and rectal cancer mortality25 and only risk of colon cancer mortality26 among current and former smokers. Similarly, a study done only among women showed a significantly increased risk of CRC mortality among both former and current smokers.27 These studies did not report results by ever smoking status. Smoking-related risk estimates for CRC mortality were reported to be higher than incidence risk estimates, especially among current smokers.19 One possible explanation could be the probability of CRC diagnosis at advanced stages among current smokers.28–30 Increased mortality could also be due to possible differences in health behavior between smokers and nonsmokers, because smokers may be less likely to receive preventive and curative care and may have a higher incidence of comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular diseases.20 The higher risk of CRC mortality among current smokers could be due to biological factors, potential confounders, or a combination of these, as reported by Liang et al,20 or to a poorer response by current smokers to cancer treatment.31 Smoking has been shown to increase mortality among patients with operable CRC.32 A recent study done by Gram et al also reported the pronounced risk of mortality from cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and respiratory diseases in current smokers compared with former smokers among middle-aged Norwegian women.15 The prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CRC in recent years have improved in many aspects. More attention to early diagnosis and breakthroughs in treatment have contributed to decreased mortality and increased survival compared with earlier decades. Our finding of decreased mortality risk estimations in the recent surveys, such as the CONOR study, compared with earlier ones, such as the Norwegian Counties Study, further supports this notion.

Conclusion

Smoking is associated with increased CRC mortality in both males and females. The risk of rectal and proximal colon cancer mortality, respectively, was most pronounced in male and female smokers.
  37 in total

1.  [The CONOR database--a little piece of Norway].

Authors:  Geir Aamodt; Anne Johanne Søgaard; Øyvind Naess; Anne Cathrine Beckstrøm; Sven Ove Samuelsen
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2010-02-11

2.  The Oslo study. Cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and young Oslo men.

Authors:  P Leren; E M Askevold; O P Foss; A Froili; D Grymyr; A Helgeland; I Hjermann; I Holme; P G Lund-Larsen; K R Norum
Journal:  Acta Med Scand Suppl       Date:  1975

3.  Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors.

Authors:  Fatima A Haggar; Robin P Boushey
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-11

4.  Serum triglycerides as an independent risk factor for death from coronary heart disease in middle-aged Norwegian men.

Authors:  A Tverdal; O P Foss; P Leren; I Holme; P G Lund-Larsen; K Bjartveit
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Cigarette smoking and colorectal carcinoma mortality in a cohort with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Laura A Colangelo; Susan M Gapstur; Peter H Gann; Alan R Dyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Smoking and smoking cessation in relation to mortality in women.

Authors:  Stacey A Kenfield; Meir J Stampfer; Bernard A Rosner; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Increased risk of colorectal cancer among smokers: results of a 26-year follow-up of US veterans and a review.

Authors:  E F Heineman; S H Zahm; J K McLaughlin; J B Vaught
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  Personal habits and indoor combustions.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  2012

9.  The hazards of death by smoking in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Inger T Gram; Sven Sandin; Tonje Braaten; Eiliv Lund; Elisabete Weiderpass
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Cohort profile: cohort of Norway (CONOR).

Authors:  Oyvind Naess; Anne Johanne Søgaard; Egil Arnesen; Anne Cathrine Beckstrøm; Espen Bjertness; Anders Engeland; Peter F Hjort; Jostein Holmen; Per Magnus; Inger Njølstad; Grethe S Tell; Lars Vatten; Stein Emil Vollset; Geir Aamodt
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-04       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  9 in total

1.  Different risk factors for advanced colorectal neoplasm in young adults.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Yoon Suk Jung; Jung Ho Park; Hong Joo Kim; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Kyu Yong Choi; Dong Il Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, Crohn's-Like Lymphoid Reaction, and Survival From Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Rozek; Stephanie L Schmit; Joel K Greenson; Lynn P Tomsho; Hedy S Rennert; Gad Rennert; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Post-diagnosis smoking and risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality in survivors of 10 adult cancers: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yafeng Wang; Huan Tao; Raheem J Paxton; Junfeng Wang; Sumaira Mubarik; Yongqian Jia; Wei Wang; Chuanhua Yu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer screening and prevention in women.

Authors:  Lyssa Chacko; Carole Macaron; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Smoking is associated with hypermethylation of the APC 1A promoter in colorectal cancer: the ColoCare Study.

Authors:  Timothy M Barrow; Hagen Klett; Reka Toth; Jürgen Böhm; Biljana Gigic; Nina Habermann; Dominique Scherer; Petra Schrotz-King; Stephanie Skender; Clare Abbenhardt-Martin; Lin Zielske; Martin Schneider; Alexis Ulrich; Peter Schirmacher; Esther Herpel; Hermann Brenner; Hauke Busch; Melanie Boerries; Cornelia M Ulrich; Karin B Michels
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Serum Metabolomic Profiling of All-Cause Mortality: A Prospective Analysis in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study Cohort.

Authors:  Jiaqi Huang; Stephanie J Weinstein; Steven C Moore; Andriy Derkach; Xing Hua; Linda M Liao; Fangyi Gu; Alison M Mondul; Joshua N Sampson; Demetrius Albanes
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Common variants in glucuronidation enzymes and membrane transporters as potential risk factors for colorectal cancer: a case control study.

Authors:  Sabrina Falkowski; Jean-Baptiste Woillard; Deborah Postil; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu; Eric Terrebonne; Antoine Pariente; Denis Smith; Rosine Guimbaud; Claire Thalamas; Koukeb Rouguieg-Malki; Pierre Marquet; Nicolas Picard
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Triple primary malignancies of surface osteosarcoma of jaw, myelodysplastic syndrome and colorectal cancer as a second primary cancer detected by PET2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography: A case report.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Maruyama; Kazuhide Nishihara; Toshiyuki Nakasone; Masanao Saio; Tessho Maruyama; Iori Tedokon; Tetsuya Ohira; Fumikazu Nimura; Akira Matayoshi; Ken-Nosuke Karube; Naoki Yoshimi; Akira Arasaki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Tumour infiltrating lymphocyte status is superior to histological grade, DNA mismatch repair and BRAF mutation for prognosis of colorectal adenocarcinomas with mucinous differentiation.

Authors:  David S Williams; Dmitri Mouradov; Marsali R Newman; Elham Amini; David K Nickless; Catherine G Fang; Michelle Palmieri; Anuratha Sakthianandeswaren; Shan Li; Robyn L Ward; Nicholas J Hawkins; Iain Skinner; Ian Jones; Peter Gibbs; Oliver M Sieber
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 7.842

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.