Literature DB >> 24741019

Three-dimensional space: locomotory style explains memory differences in rats and hummingbirds.

I Nuri Flores-Abreu1, T Andrew Hurly, James A Ainge, Susan D Healy.   

Abstract

While most animals live in a three-dimensional world, they move through it to different extents depending on their mode of locomotion: terrestrial animals move vertically less than do swimming and flying animals. As nearly everything we know about how animals learn and remember locations in space comes from two-dimensional experiments in the horizontal plane, here we determined whether the use of three-dimensional space by a terrestrial and a flying animal was correlated with memory for a rewarded location. In the cubic mazes in which we trained and tested rats and hummingbirds, rats moved more vertically than horizontally, whereas hummingbirds moved equally in the three dimensions. Consistent with their movement preferences, rats were more accurate in relocating the horizontal component of a rewarded location than they were in the vertical component. Hummingbirds, however, were more accurate in the vertical dimension than they were in the horizontal, a result that cannot be explained by their use of space. Either as a result of evolution or ontogeny, it appears that birds and rats prioritize horizontal versus vertical components differently when they remember three-dimensional space.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hummingbirds; locomotory style; rats; spatial cognition; three-dimensional navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24741019      PMCID: PMC4043095          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  Fractional rate of change of swim-bladder volume is reliably related to absolute depth during vertical displacements in teleost fish.

Authors:  Graham K Taylor; Robert Iain Holbrook; Theresa Burt de Perera
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Three-dimensional spatial cognition: information in the vertical dimension overrides information from the horizontal.

Authors:  Robert I Holbrook; Theresa Burt de Perera
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Three-dimensional spatial representation in freely swimming fish.

Authors:  Theresa Burt de Perera; Robert I Holbrook
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

4.  Representation of three-dimensional space in the hippocampus of flying bats.

Authors:  Michael M Yartsev; Nachum Ulanovsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory.

Authors:  R D'Hooge; P P De Deyn
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-08

6.  A phase plane representation of rat exploratory behavior.

Authors:  O Tchernichovski; I Golani
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Geographical slant facilitates navigation and orientation in virtual environments.

Authors:  Jan D Restat; Sibylle D Steck; Horst F Mochnatzki; Hanspeter A Mallot
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Bat and rat neurons differ in theta-frequency resonance despite similar coding of space.

Authors:  James G Heys; Katrina M MacLeod; Cynthia F Moss; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Horizontal biases in rats' use of three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Aleksandar Jovalekic; Robin Hayman; Natalia Becares; Harry Reid; George Thomas; Jonathan Wilson; Kate Jeffery
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Anisotropic encoding of three-dimensional space by place cells and grid cells.

Authors:  Robin Hayman; Madeleine A Verriotis; Aleksandar Jovalekic; André A Fenton; Kathryn J Jeffery
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  6 in total

1.  Going Up or Sideways? Perception of Space and Obstacles Negotiating by Cuttlefish.

Authors:  Gabriella Scatà; Anne-Sophie Darmaillacq; Ludovic Dickel; Steve McCusker; Nadav Shashar
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 2.  The Representation of Three-Dimensional Space in Fish.

Authors:  Theresa Burt de Perera; Robert I Holbrook; Victoria Davis
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.558

3.  Hippocampus, Retrosplenial and Parahippocampal Cortices Encode Multicompartment 3D Space in a Hierarchical Manner.

Authors:  Misun Kim; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Testing Navigation in Real Space: Contributions to Understanding the Physiology and Pathology of Human Navigation Control.

Authors:  Florian Schöberl; Andreas Zwergal; Thomas Brandt
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  Patterns of floral nectar standing crops allow plants to manipulate their pollinators.

Authors:  Graham H Pyke; John R M Kalman; Dayanne M Bordin; Lucas Blanes; Philip A Doble
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Volumetric spatial behaviour in rats reveals the anisotropic organisation of navigation.

Authors:  Selim Jedidi-Ayoub; Karyna Mishchanchuk; Anyi Liu; Sophie Renaudineau; Éléonore Duvelle; Roddy M Grieves
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.084

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.