| Literature DB >> 24740014 |
Christine Azevedo Coste1, Benoît Sijobert2, Roger Pissard-Gibollet3, Maud Pasquier4, Bernard Espiau5, Christian Geny6.
Abstract
Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common symptom in Parkinsonism, which affects the gait pattern and is associated to a fall risk. Automatized FOG episode detection would allow systematic assessment of patient state and objective evaluation of the clinical effects of treatments. Techniques have been proposed in the literature to identify FOG episodes based on the frequency properties of inertial sensor signals. Our objective here is to adapt and extend these FOG detectors in order to include other associated gait pattern changes, like festination. The proposed approach is based on a single wireless inertial sensor placed on the patient's lower limbs. The preliminary experimental results show that existing frequency-based freezing detectors are not sufficient to detect all FOG and festination episodes and that the observation of some gait parameters such as stride length and cadence are valuable inputs to anticipate the occurrence of upcoming FOG events.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24740014 PMCID: PMC4029660 DOI: 10.3390/s140406819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.(a) FOX node: wireless inertial measurement unit. (b) Patient equipped with the sensor.
Figure 2.Example of FOG episode observed through an IMU sensor.
FOG episodes detected through video analysis, via FI and FOGC algorithms.
| Green | 18 | 9 | 13 |
| Orange | 12 | 6 | 10 |
| Red | 14 | 11 | 12 |
| False positives | 0 | 17 | 13 |
Figure 3.FOGC (Top) and FI (Bottom) were calculated from inertial measures provided by one IMU placed at ankle. Based on video recordings, the FOG events were classified from green to red (vertical lines), regarding their intensity. A FOG detection threshold is set to 0.008 for the FOGC and 0.1 for the FI (horizontal blue lines), with a 4 s NFFT window.
Figure 4.Zoomed view of Figure 3. Around 670 s, an important FOG event is detected by FOGC (Top) but not FI (Bottom).
Figure 5.IMU rough data corresponding Figure 4 non-detected FOG event.