Literature DB >> 24739331

Early intervention for first-episode psychosis: broadening the scope of economic estimates.

A-La Park1, Paul McCrone2, Martin Knapp1,2.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore the economic impacts of early intervention in England on outcomes and costs for people with first-episode psychosis.
METHODS: Three decision analytical models were constructed to compare treatment by early intervention for first-episode psychosis with standard care in relation to employment, education, homicide and suicide. Data on effectiveness and costs were taken from previous studies and expert opinion. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of assumptions.
RESULTS: Our models indicate that early intervention demonstrates savings of £2087 per person over 3 years from improved employment and education outcomes. In addition, the annual costs over 10 years related to homicide after early intervention were £80 lower than for standard care. There were also annual savings of £957 per person for early intervention over 4 years compared to standard care as a result of suicides averted.
CONCLUSIONS: Not only can investment in early intervention help reduce some of the long-term costs and consequences of mental disorders to the health-care system. In addition, there are broader economic benefits that strengthen the potential cost savings to society.
© 2014 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision modelling; economics; employment; psychotic disorder; suicide

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24739331     DOI: 10.1111/eip.12149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry        ISSN: 1751-7885            Impact factor:   2.732


  9 in total

1.  More treatment for those most in need? A foregone conclusion?

Authors:  Celso Arango; René S Kahn
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Economics and mental health: the current scenario.

Authors:  Martin Knapp; Gloria Wong
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Improving outcomes of first-episode psychosis: an overview.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Patrick D McGorry; John M Kane
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Early intervention in psychosis: p-values, policy, and politics.

Authors:  Robert Rosenheck
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  Economic Evaluation of Early Psychosis Interventions From A Canadian Perspective.

Authors:  Jean-Eric Tarride; Gord Blackhouse; Amal Abdel-Baki; Eric Latimer; Gillian Mulvale; Brian Cooper; Gord Langill; Deborah Milinkovic; Rosain Stennett; Jeremiah Hurley
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.321

6.  Schizophrenia--time to commit to policy change.

Authors:  W Wolfgang Fleischhacker; Celso Arango; Paul Arteel; Thomas R E Barnes; William Carpenter; Ken Duckworth; Silvana Galderisi; Lisa Halpern; Martin Knapp; Stephen R Marder; Mary Moller; Norman Sartorius; Peter Woodruff
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Association of an Early Intervention Service for Psychosis With Suicide Rate Among Patients With First-Episode Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Sherry Kit Wa Chan; Stephanie Wing Yan Chan; Herbert H Pang; Kang K Yan; Christy Lai Ming Hui; Wing Chung Chang; Edwin Ho Ming Lee; Eric Yu Hai Chen
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 21.596

8.  Epidemiology on demand: population-based approaches to mental health service commissioning.

Authors:  James B Kirkbride
Journal:  BJPsych Bull       Date:  2015-10

9.  'Care co-ordinator in my pocket': a feasibility study of mobile assessment and therapy for psychosis (TechCare).

Authors:  Nadeem Gire; Neil Caton; Mick McKeown; Naeem Mohmed; Joy Duxbury; James Kelly; Miv Riley; Peter J Taylor; Christopher D J Taylor; Farooq Naeem; Imran Bashir Chaudhry; Nusrat Husain
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.