Literature DB >> 24739197

Digestive capacity and toxicity cause mixed diets in red knots that maximize energy intake rate.

Thomas Oudman1, Jeroen Onrust, Jimmy de Fouw, Bernard Spaans, Theunis Piersma, Jan A van Gils.   

Abstract

Among energy-maximizing animals, preferences for different prey can be explained by ranking the prey according to their energetic content. However, diet choice also depends on characteristics of the predator, such as the need to ingest necessary nutrients and the constraints imposed by digestion and toxins in food. In combination, these factors can lead to mixed diets in which the energetically most profitable food is not eaten exclusively even when it is abundant. We studied diet choice in red knots (Calidris canutus canutus) feeding on mollusks at a West African wintering site. At this site, the birds fed primarily on two species of bivalves, a thick-shelled one (Dosinia isocardia) that imposed a digestive constraint and a thin-shelled one (Loripes lucinalis) that imposed a toxin constraint. The latter species is toxic due to its symbiotic association with sulfide-oxidizing bacteria. We estimated experimentally the parameters of a linear programming model that includes both digestive and toxin constraints, leading to the prediction that red knots should eat a mixture of both mollusk species to maximize energy intake. The model correctly predicted the preferences of the captive birds, which depended on the digestive quality and toxicity of their previous diet. At our study site, energy-maximizing red knots appear to select a mixed diet as a result of the simultaneous effects of digestive and toxin constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24739197     DOI: 10.1086/675759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  8 in total

1.  How salinity and temperature combine to affect physiological state and performance in red knots with contrasting non-breeding environments.

Authors:  Jorge S Gutiérrez; Andrea Soriano-Redondo; Anne Dekinga; Auxiliadora Villegas; José A Masero; Theunis Piersma
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Sulfur in lucinid bivalves inhibits intake rates of a molluscivore shorebird.

Authors:  Tim Oortwijn; Jimmy de Fouw; Jillian M Petersen; Jan A van Gils
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Foraging for high caloric anthropogenic prey is energetically costly.

Authors:  Susanne van Donk; Judy Shamoun-Baranes; Jaap van der Meer; Kees C J Camphuysen
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.600

4.  The Effect of Digestive Capacity on the Intake Rate of Toxic and Non-Toxic Prey in an Ecological Context.

Authors:  Thomas Oudman; Vincent Hin; Anne Dekinga; Jan A van Gils
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Validating the Incorporation of 13C and 15N in a Shorebird That Consumes an Isotopically Distinct Chemosymbiotic Bivalve.

Authors:  Jan A van Gils; Mohamed Vall Ahmedou Salem
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Phenotype-limited distributions: short-billed birds move away during times that prey bury deeply.

Authors:  Sjoerd Duijns; Jan A van Gils; Jennifer Smart; Theunis Piersma
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Stomach fullness shapes prey choice decisions in crab plovers (Dromas ardeola).

Authors:  Roy Gommer; Roeland A Bom; Thijs P M Fijen; Jan A van Gils
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Resource landscapes explain contrasting patterns of aggregation and site fidelity by red knots at two wintering sites.

Authors:  Thomas Oudman; Theunis Piersma; Mohamed V Ahmedou Salem; Marieke E Feis; Anne Dekinga; Sander Holthuijsen; Job Ten Horn; Jan A van Gils; Allert I Bijleveld
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.