Literature DB >> 24739178

Involvement of miR-605 and miR-34a in the DNA damage response promotes apoptosis induction.

Chun-Hong Zhou1, Xiao-Peng Zhang2, Feng Liu3, Wei Wang4.   

Abstract

MicroRNAs are key regulators of gene expression at the posttranscriptional level. In this study, we focus on miR-605 and miR-34a, which are direct transcriptional targets of p53 and in turn enhance its tumor suppressor function by acting upstream and downstream of it, respectively. miR-605 promotes p53 activation by repressing the expression of mdm2, whereas miR-34a promotes p53-dependent apoptosis by suppressing the expression of antiapoptotic genes such as bcl-2. What roles they play in the p53-mediated DNA damage response is less well understood. Here, we develop a four-module model of the p53 network to investigate the effect of miR-605 and miR-34a on the cell-fate decision after ionizing radiation. Results of numerical simulation indicate that the cell fate is closely associated with network dynamics. The concentration of p53 undergoes few pulses in response to repairable DNA damage, or it first oscillates and then switches to high plateau levels after irreparable damage. The amplitude of p53 pulses rises to various extents depending on miR-605 expression, and miR-605 accelerates the switching behavior of p53 levels to induce apoptosis. In parallel, miR-34a promotes apoptosis by enhancing the accumulation of free p53AIP1, a key proapoptotic protein. Thus, both miR-605 and miR-34a can mediate cellular outcomes and the timing of apoptosis. Moreover, miR-605 and PTEN complement each other in elevating p53 levels to trigger apoptosis. Taken together, miR-605 and miR-34a cooperate to endow the network with a fail-safe mechanism for apoptosis induction. This computational study also enriches our understanding of the action modes of p53-targeted microRNAs.
Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24739178      PMCID: PMC4008794          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  48 in total

1.  PTEN and p53: who will get the upper hand?

Authors:  Lloyd C Trotman; Pier Paolo Pandolfi
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  Accelerated MDM2 auto-degradation induced by DNA-damage kinases is required for p53 activation.

Authors:  Jayne M Stommel; Geoffrey M Wahl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets.

Authors:  Benjamin P Lewis; Christopher B Burge; David P Bartel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  The p53 pathway: positive and negative feedback loops.

Authors:  Sandra L Harris; Arnold J Levine
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 5.  Signaling to p53: breaking the MDM2-p53 circuit.

Authors:  C Prives
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Crystal structure of the tetramerization domain of the p53 tumor suppressor at 1.7 angstroms.

Authors:  P D Jeffrey; S Gorina; N P Pavletich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Caspase-3-dependent cleavage of Bcl-2 promotes release of cytochrome c.

Authors:  D G Kirsch; A Doseff; B N Chau; D S Lim; N C de Souza-Pinto; R Hansford; M B Kastan; Y A Lazebnik; J M Hardwick
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-07-23       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Negative regulation of PKB/Akt-dependent cell survival by the tumor suppressor PTEN.

Authors:  V Stambolic; A Suzuki; J L de la Pompa; G M Brothers; C Mirtsos; T Sasaki; J Ruland; J M Penninger; D P Siderovski; T W Mak
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation.

Authors:  Christopher J Bakkenist; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Promoter methylation of the PTEN gene is a common molecular change in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jose M García; Javier Silva; Cristina Peña; Vanesa Garcia; Rufo Rodríguez; Miguel A Cruz; Blanca Cantos; Mariano Provencio; Pilar España; Felix Bonilla
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Dynamics of p53: A Master Decider of Cell Fate.

Authors:  Qingyin Luo; Jill M Beaver; Yuan Liu; Zunzhen Zhang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  HIC1 and miR-23~27~24 clusters form a double-negative feedback loop in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yanbo Wang; Hongwei Liang; Geyu Zhou; Xiuting Hu; Zhengya Liu; Fangfang Jin; Mengchao Yu; Jianfeng Sang; Yong Zhou; Zheng Fu; Chen-Yu Zhang; Weijie Zhang; Ke Zen; Xi Chen
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Coordination of miR-192 and miR-22 in p53-Mediated Cell Fate Decision.

Authors:  Cheng-Yuan Sun; Xiao-Peng Zhang; Wei Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.