Literature DB >> 24738867

Lessons to be learnt in managing the breech presentation at term: an 11-year single-centre retrospective study.

Ailsa Borbolla Foster1, Annalise Bagust, Andrew Bisits, Matthew Holland, Alec Welsh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2000 publication of the Term Breech Trial significantly impacted obstetric practice in Australia with a rapid increase in delivery of term breech singletons by caesarean section. More reassuring data from European centres who continued to offer vaginal breech deliveries to carefully selected women have led to a softening of international guidelines which now support an individualised approach to management. The application of this principle to an Australian population, particularly in the wake of such a major change in obstetric practice, has not previously been demonstrated. AIM: To compare short-term neonatal and maternal morbidity for infants with a singleton breech presentation born after 37 weeks, according to planned mode of delivery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven-year single-centre retrospective study with intention-to-treat analysis based on intended mode of delivery.
RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-three of 766 (31.7%) eligible women elected for planned vaginal breech delivery. The overall success rate in this group was 58%. Morbidity rates were low and compare favourably with similar international studies. However, there was a nonsignificant trend towards higher rates of short-term serious neonatal and maternal morbidity in the planned vaginal delivery group (1.6 vs 0.4%, P = 0.08 and 8.2 vs 4.8%, P = 0.06, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Attempted vaginal delivery for breech presentation remains an option in carefully selected women under strict obstetric protocols.
© 2014 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breech; caesarean section; fetal presentation; obstetric delivery; term

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24738867     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  5 in total

1.  Comparing forces on the fetal neck in breech delivery in lithotomy versus all-fours position: a simulation model.

Authors:  Constantin S von Kaisenberg; Delnaz Fard; Chiara S Borchers; Jill-Caren Philippeit; Anja V Philippeit; Laura R Kaukemüller; Lara R Higgins-Wood; Spyridon Papageorgiou; Peter Hillemanns; Rüdiger Klapdor
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Women's experiences of planning a vaginal breech birth in Australia.

Authors:  Caroline Se Homer; Nicole P Watts; Karolina Petrovska; Chauncey M Sjostedt; Andrew Bisits
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Maternal and neonatal outcome after vaginal breech delivery at term of children weighing more or less than 3.8 kg: A FRABAT prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lukas Jennewein; Ulrikke Kielland-Kaisen; Bettina Paul; Charlotte J Möllmann; Anna-Sophia Klemt; Sally Schulze; Nina Bock; Wiebke Schaarschmidt; Dörthe Brüggmann; Frank Louwen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Maternal and fetal risks of planned vaginal breech delivery vs planned caesarean section for term breech birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco J Fernández-Carrasco; Delia Cristóbal-Cañadas; Juan Gómez-Salgado; Juana M Vázquez-Lara; Luciano Rodríguez-Díaz; Tesifón Parrón-Carreño
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 7.664

5.  Breech birth at home: outcomes of 60 breech and 109 cephalic planned home and birth center births.

Authors:  Stuart James Fischbein; Rixa Freeze
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.