| Literature DB >> 24738626 |
Jonathan R McDaniel1, Sarah R MacEwan, Xinghai Li, D Christopher Radford, Chelsea D Landon, Mark Dewhirst, Ashutosh Chilkoti.
Abstract
This paper demonstrates the first example of targeting a solid tumor that is externally heated to 42 °C by "heat seeking" drug-loaded polypeptide nanoparticles. These nanoparticles consist of a thermally responsive elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) conjugated to multiple copies of a hydrophobic cancer drug. To rationally design drug-loaded nanoparticles that exhibit thermal responsiveness in the narrow temperature range between 37 and 42 °C, an analytical model was developed that relates ELP composition and chain length to the nanoparticle phase transition temperature. Suitable candidates were designed based on the predictions of the model and tested in vivo by intravital confocal fluorescence microscopy of solid tumors, which revealed that the nanoparticles aggregate in the vasculature of tumors heated to 42 °C and that the aggregation is reversible as the temperature reverts to 37 °C. Biodistribution studies showed that the most effective strategy to target the nanoparticles to tumors is to thermally cycle the tumors between 37 and 42 °C. These nanoparticles set the stage for the targeted delivery of a range of cancer chemotherapeutics by externally applied mild hyperthermia of solid tumors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24738626 PMCID: PMC4025578 DOI: 10.1021/nl5009376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nano Lett ISSN: 1530-6984 Impact factor: 11.189
Figure 1(A) Predicted versus observed Tt for a global fit of CP nanoparticles in PBS (r2 = 0.994; n = 120). The CP nanoparticles were generated through the conjugation of n-benzyl maleimide to the C-terminal cysteine residues. (B) The model was used to predict the composition and length of a family of thermally responsive (39–42 °C) CP nanoparticles (shown in red) at a concentration typical for drug delivery using CPs (25 μM) in PBS.
Figure 2(A) Observed (markers) Tt for CP nanoparticles (conjugated to n-benzyl maleimide) in 90% FBS. Dashed lines represent the best exponential fit. Black dashed lines demarcate the targeted range of hyperthermia (39–42 °C). Indicated constructs (arrows) represent those selected for additional in vivo biodistribution and pharmacokinetic studies. (B) Light scattering analysis of three CP–Dox nanoparticle constructs. The points in red represent the hydrodynamic radius (Rh), and the points in black represent the average number of CPs per nanoparticle (#CPs/NP) as calculated by dividing the absolute molecular weight of the micelle by the molecular weight of the CP. The lines are simply a guide to the eye.
Figure 3(A) Plasma concentration of doxorubicin-loaded CP nanoparticles following systemic administration into mice. The data points represent the mean ± SD (n = 3), and the dashed lines represent the curves of best fit to the two-compartment model by SAAM II. (B) Distribution of doxorubicin within select organs 24 h post administration. Data represent the mean ± SD with n = 3 mice. The significance (one-way ANOVA, Tukey posthoc) was calculated for the 40 and 80 pentamer constructs for all time points. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.005 against the 160 pentapeptide construct.
Half-Life and AUC of CP–Dox Micelles Composed of CPs with Varying Sizesa
| parameter | 40 pentamers | 80 pentamers | 160 pentamers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| elimination half-life | β | 9.6 (0.4) | 12.1 (1.0) | 15.5 (0.9) |
| area under the curve | AUC (μM·h) | 1202.9 (42.8) | 2690.5 (119.6) | 3734.6 (112.3) |
Data represent the mean (SD) of the best fit parameters determined by SAAM II.
Figure 4In vivo visualization of the phase transition in response to heat. A control CP micelle formation with a Tt of 50 °C remained soluble when heated to (A) 37 °C and (B) 42 °C for 10 min each. A thermally responsive micelle formulation that transitions at 39 °C remains soluble at (C) 37 °C but phase separates at (D) 42 °C after 10 min. Scale bars represent 100 μm. Scale bars represent 100 μm. Red represents ELP; green represents tumor vasculature.
Figure 5Tumor biodistribution of a thermally responsive and a control CP–Dox nanoparticle formulation following two heating schedules. Mice were sacrificed 120 min following drug administration. *p < 0.05.