Literature DB >> 24738580

Statistical model selection for Markov models of biomolecular dynamics.

Robert T McGibbon1, Christian R Schwantes, Vijay S Pande.   

Abstract

Markov state models provide a powerful framework for the analysis of biomolecular conformation dynamics in terms of their metastable states and transition rates. These models provide both a quantitative and comprehensible description of the long-time scale dynamics of large molecular dynamics with a Master equation and have been successfully used to study protein folding, protein conformational change, and protein-ligand binding. However, to achieve satisfactory performance, existing methodologies often require expert intervention when defining the model's discrete state space. While standard model selection methodologies focus on the minimization of systematic bias and disregard statistical error, we show that by consideration of the states' conditional distribution over conformations, both sources of error can be balanced evenhandedly. Application of techniques that consider both systematic bias and statistical error on two 100 μs molecular dynamics trajectories of the Fip35 WW domain shows agreement with existing techniques based on self-consistency of the model's relaxation time scales with more suitable results in regimes in which those time scale-based techniques encourage overfitting. By removing the need for expert tuning, these methods should reduce modeling bias and lower the barriers to entry in Markov state model construction.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24738580     DOI: 10.1021/jp411822r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  15 in total

1.  Efficient maximum likelihood parameterization of continuous-time Markov processes.

Authors:  Robert T McGibbon; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Variational cross-validation of slow dynamical modes in molecular kinetics.

Authors:  Robert T McGibbon; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Optimized parameter selection reveals trends in Markov state models for protein folding.

Authors:  Brooke E Husic; Robert T McGibbon; Mohammad M Sultan; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Perspective: Markov models for long-timescale biomolecular dynamics.

Authors:  C R Schwantes; R T McGibbon; V S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Markov State Models and tICA Reveal a Nonnative Folding Nucleus in Simulations of NuG2.

Authors:  Christian R Schwantes; Diwakar Shukla; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  ivis Dimensionality Reduction Framework for Biomacromolecular Simulations.

Authors:  Hao Tian; Peng Tao
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Linking time-series of single-molecule experiments with molecular dynamics simulations by machine learning.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Matsunaga; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Current state of theoretical and experimental studies of the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC).

Authors:  Sergei Yu Noskov; Tatiana K Rostovtseva; Adam C Chamberlin; Oscar Teijido; Wei Jiang; Sergey M Bezrukov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2016-03-03

9.  A single amino acid substitution confers B-cell clonogenic activity to the HIV-1 matrix protein p17.

Authors:  Cinzia Giagulli; Pasqualina D'Ursi; Wangxiao He; Simone Zorzan; Francesca Caccuri; Kristen Varney; Alessandro Orro; Stefania Marsico; Benoît Otjacques; Carlo Laudanna; Luciano Milanesi; Riccardo Dolcetti; Simona Fiorentini; Wuyuan Lu; Arnaldo Caruso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Modeling molecular kinetics with tICA and the kernel trick.

Authors:  Christian R Schwantes; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.