Tawee Tanvetyanon1, Ji-Hyun Lee2, William J Fulp2, Fred Schreiber2, Richard H Brown2, Richard M Levine2, Thomas H Cartwright2, Guillermo Abesada-Terk2, George P Kim2, Carlos Alemany2, Douglas Faig2, Philip V Sharp2, Merry-Jennifer Markham2, Mokenge Malafa2, Paul B Jacobsen2. 1. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; Center for Cancer Care and Research at Watson Clinic, Lakeland; Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Sarasota; Spacecoast Cancer Center, Titusville; Ocala Oncology, Ocala; Coastal Oncology and Hematology, Stuart; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Cancer Center of Florida, Orlando; North Broward Medical Center, Deerfield Beach; Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Tallahassee; and University of Florida, Gainesville, FL tanvett@moffitt.org. 2. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; Center for Cancer Care and Research at Watson Clinic, Lakeland; Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Sarasota; Spacecoast Cancer Center, Titusville; Ocala Oncology, Ocala; Coastal Oncology and Hematology, Stuart; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Cancer Center of Florida, Orlando; North Broward Medical Center, Deerfield Beach; Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Tallahassee; and University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Audit and feedback have been widely used to enhance the performance of various medical practices. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common diseases encountered in medical oncology practice. We investigated the use of audit and feedback to improve the care of NSCLC. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for patients with NSCLC first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 (n = 518) and 2009 (n = 573) at 10 oncology practices participating in the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care. In 2008, feedback from 2006 audit results was provided to practices, which then independently undertook steps to improve their performance. Sixteen quality-of-care indicators (QCIs) were evaluated on both time points and were examined for changes in adherence over time. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in adherence was observed for five of 16 QCIs. Adherence to brain staging using magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography scan for stage III NSCLC (57.8% in 2006 v 82.8% in 2009; P = .001), availability of chemotherapy flow sheet (89.2% v 97.0%; P < .001), documentation of performance status for stage III and IV disease (43.4% v 51.3%; P < .001), availability of pathology report for patients undergoing surgery (95.2% v 99.2%; P = .02), and availability of signed chemotherapy consent (69.5% v 76.3%; P = .04). There were no statistically significant decreases in adherence on any QCIs. CONCLUSION: Audit with feedback was associated with a modest but important improvement in the treatment of NSCLC. Whether these changes are durable will require long-term follow-up.
PURPOSE: Audit and feedback have been widely used to enhance the performance of various medical practices. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common diseases encountered in medical oncology practice. We investigated the use of audit and feedback to improve the care of NSCLC. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for patients with NSCLC first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 (n = 518) and 2009 (n = 573) at 10 oncology practices participating in the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care. In 2008, feedback from 2006 audit results was provided to practices, which then independently undertook steps to improve their performance. Sixteen quality-of-care indicators (QCIs) were evaluated on both time points and were examined for changes in adherence over time. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in adherence was observed for five of 16 QCIs. Adherence to brain staging using magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography scan for stage III NSCLC (57.8% in 2006 v 82.8% in 2009; P = .001), availability of chemotherapy flow sheet (89.2% v 97.0%; P < .001), documentation of performance status for stage III and IV disease (43.4% v 51.3%; P < .001), availability of pathology report for patients undergoing surgery (95.2% v 99.2%; P = .02), and availability of signed chemotherapy consent (69.5% v 76.3%; P = .04). There were no statistically significant decreases in adherence on any QCIs. CONCLUSION: Audit with feedback was associated with a modest but important improvement in the treatment of NSCLC. Whether these changes are durable will require long-term follow-up.
Authors: Patricia W Stone; Carolyn T A Herzig; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Eileen Carter; Ragnhildur I Bjarnadottir; Patricia K Semeraro; Catherine C Cohen; Jasmine Travers; Steven Schweon Journal: Geriatr Nurs Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 2.361
Authors: Paul B Jacobsen; Ji-Hyun Lee; William Fulp; Erin M Siegel; David Shibata; Christine Laronga; Jhanelle Gray; Tawee Tanvetyanon; Fred Schreiber; Richard Brown; Richard Levine; Thomas Cartwright; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; George Kim; Carlos Alemany; Douglas Faig; Philip Sharp; Merry-Jennifer Markham; Mokenge Malafa Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Amir H Safavi; Janet Papadakos; Tina Papadakos; Naa Kwarley Quartey; Karen Lawrie; Eden Klein; Sarah Storer; Jennifer Croke; Barbara-Ann Millar; Raymond Jang; Andrea Bezjak; Meredith E Giuliani Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 2.037