Literature DB >> 24737548

U.S. Food and Drug Administration inspections of clinical investigators: overview of results from 1977 to 2009.

Sonia K Morgan-Linnell1, David J Stewart2, Razelle Kurzrock3.   

Abstract

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research is responsible for evaluating drug safety and efficacy, including oversight of clinical trials and principal investigators. The FDA Clinical Investigator Inspection List (CIIL) contains online, detailed, relevant information of all FDA inspections. We reviewed FDA inspections of clinical investigators to ascertain their outcome and included all inspections on the list (July 1977 through December 31, 2009; n = 9,481 inspections). Eighty-eight percent of inspections were "data audit" (primary purpose = verification of data), and the rest (12%) were "for cause." The number of inspections each year significantly increased over time (P < 0.0001) and averaged 350 per year in the past decade. No deficiencies were found in only 11.2% of all "data audit" and 5% of all "for cause" inspections. Only 31% of inspections resulted in "no action indicated." About two thirds of inspections resulted in some finding, requiring either voluntary investigator action (61.3% of inspections) or official FDA action (3.9%). The most frequently cited deficiencies were failure to follow investigational plan (34%), inadequate informed consent form (28%), and inadequate/inaccurate records (27%). In conclusion, over the past decade, the FDA has performed approximately 350 inspections per year, with the number increasing over time. The vast majority of FDA inspections yield deficiency findings and, as a result, only about one third of inspections have an outcome of "no action indicated." ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24737548     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  2 in total

1.  'Screening audit' as a quality assurance tool in good clinical practice compliant research environments.

Authors:  Sinyoung Park; Chung Mo Nam; Sejung Park; Yang Hee Noh; Cho Rong Ahn; Wan Sun Yu; Bo Kyung Kim; Seung Min Kim; Jin Seok Kim; Sun Young Rha
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Clinical Investigator Training Program (CITP) - A practical and pragmatic approach to conveying clinical investigator competencies and training to busy clinicians.

Authors:  Mansoor Saleh; Gurudatta Naik; Penelope Jester; Cynthia Joiner; Elizabeth Westfall; David W Kimberlin; James Willig; David Redden; Juliette Southworth; Mark T Dransfield
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-06-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.