BACKGROUND: Brachytherapy has been shown to be an efficacious and cost-effective treatment among patients with localized prostate cancer. In this study, the authors examined trends in brachytherapy use for localized prostate cancer using a large national cancer registry. METHODS: In the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a total of 1,547,941 patients with localized prostate cancer were identified from 1998 through 2010. Excluding patients with lymph node-positive or metastatic disease, the authors examined primary treatment trends focusing on the use of brachytherapy over time. Patients with available data (2004-2009) were stratified by National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk criteria. Controlling for year of diagnosis and demographic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics, multivariate analyses were performed examining the association between patient characteristics and receipt of brachytherapy. RESULTS: In the study cohort, brachytherapy use reached a peak of 16.7% in 2002, and then steadily declined to a low of 8% in 2010. Of the 719,789 patients with available data for risk stratification, 41.1%, 35.3%, and 23.6%, respectively, met low, intermediate, and high National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk criteria. After adjustment, patients of increasing age and those with Medicare insurance were more likely to receive brachytherapy. In contrast, patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk disease, Medicaid insurance, increasing comorbidity count, and increasing year of diagnosis were less likely to receive brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with localized prostate cancer who are treated at National Cancer Data Base institutions, there has been a steady decline in brachytherapy use since 2003. For low-risk patients, the declining use of brachytherapy monotherapy compared with more costly emerging therapies has significant health policy implications.
BACKGROUND: Brachytherapy has been shown to be an efficacious and cost-effective treatment among patients with localized prostate cancer. In this study, the authors examined trends in brachytherapy use for localized prostate cancer using a large national cancer registry. METHODS: In the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a total of 1,547,941 patients with localized prostate cancer were identified from 1998 through 2010. Excluding patients with lymph node-positive or metastatic disease, the authors examined primary treatment trends focusing on the use of brachytherapy over time. Patients with available data (2004-2009) were stratified by National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk criteria. Controlling for year of diagnosis and demographic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics, multivariate analyses were performed examining the association between patient characteristics and receipt of brachytherapy. RESULTS: In the study cohort, brachytherapy use reached a peak of 16.7% in 2002, and then steadily declined to a low of 8% in 2010. Of the 719,789 patients with available data for risk stratification, 41.1%, 35.3%, and 23.6%, respectively, met low, intermediate, and high National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk criteria. After adjustment, patients of increasing age and those with Medicare insurance were more likely to receive brachytherapy. In contrast, patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk disease, Medicaid insurance, increasing comorbidity count, and increasing year of diagnosis were less likely to receive brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with localized prostate cancer who are treated at National Cancer Data Base institutions, there has been a steady decline in brachytherapy use since 2003. For low-risk patients, the declining use of brachytherapy monotherapy compared with more costly emerging therapies has significant health policy implications.
Authors: Usama Mahmood; Thomas Pugh; Steven Frank; Lawrence Levy; Gary Walker; Waqar Haque; Matthew Koshy; William Graber; David Swanson; Karen Hoffman; Deborah Kuban; Andrew Lee Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Leslie S Wilson; Ross Tesoro; Eric P Elkin; Natalia Sadetsky; Jeanette M Broering; David M Latini; Janeen DuChane; Reema R Mody; Peter R Carroll Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Al V Taira; Gregory S Merrick; Wayne M Butler; Robert W Galbreath; Jonathan Lief; Edward Adamovich; Kent E Wallner Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Clifford Y Ko Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ashesh B Jani; Peter A S Johnstone; Stanley L Liauw; Viraj A Master; Peter J Rossi Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Richard S Hoehn; Dennis J Hanseman; Peter L Jernigan; Koffi Wima; Audrey E Ertel; Daniel E Abbott; Shimul A Shah Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Nikhil G Thaker; Thomas J Pugh; Usama Mahmood; Seungtaek Choi; Tracy E Spinks; Neil E Martin; Terence T Sio; Rajat J Kudchadker; Robert S Kaplan; Deborah A Kuban; David A Swanson; Peter F Orio; Michael J Zelefsky; Brett W Cox; Louis Potters; Thomas A Buchholz; Thomas W Feeley; Steven J Frank Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Daniel G Petereit; Steven J Frank; Akila N Viswanathan; Beth Erickson; Patricia Eifel; Paul L Nguyen; David E Wazer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: M E Schutzer; P F Orio; M C Biagioli; D A Asher; H Lomas; D Moghanaki Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Giovanni Fellin; Maria A Mirri; Luigi Santoro; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Claudio Divan; Salvatore Mussari; Francesco Ziglio; Beniamino La Face; Fernando Barbera; Michela Buglione; Laura Bandera; Barbara Ghedi; Nadia G Di Muzio; Andrea Losa; Paola Mangili; Luciano Nava; Renato Chiarlone; Nunzia Ciscognetti; Emilio Gastaldi; Federica Cattani; Ruggero Spoto; Andrea Vavassori; Francesca R Giglioli; Alessia Guarneri; Valentina Cerboneschi; Marcello Mignogna; Mauro Paoluzzi; Valentina Ravaglia; Costanza Chiumento; Stefania Clemente; Vincenzo Fusco; Roberto Santini; Marco Stefanacci; Francesco P Mangiacotti; Marco Martini; Tiziana Palloni; Giuseppe Schinaia; Grazia Lazzari; Giovanni Silvano; Stefano Magrini; Umberto Ricardi; Riccardo Santoni; Roberto Orecchia Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Talha Shaikh; Lora Wang; Karen Ruth; Mark Hallman; David Y Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Jinsheng Li; Kevin Crawford; Eric M Horwitz Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Chad Tang; Xiudong Lei; Grace L Smith; Hubert Y Pan; Karen E Hoffman; Rachit Kumar; Brian F Chapin; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Steven J Frank; Benjamin D Smith Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-12-13 Impact factor: 7.038