Literature DB >> 24737481

The rise and fall of prostate brachytherapy: use of brachytherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in the National Cancer Data Base.

Jeffrey M Martin1, Elizabeth A Handorf, Alexander Kutikov, Robert G Uzzo, Justin E Bekelman, Eric M Horwitz, Marc C Smaldone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brachytherapy has been shown to be an efficacious and cost-effective treatment among patients with localized prostate cancer. In this study, the authors examined trends in brachytherapy use for localized prostate cancer using a large national cancer registry.
METHODS: In the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a total of 1,547,941 patients with localized prostate cancer were identified from 1998 through 2010. Excluding patients with lymph node-positive or metastatic disease, the authors examined primary treatment trends focusing on the use of brachytherapy over time. Patients with available data (2004-2009) were stratified by National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk criteria. Controlling for year of diagnosis and demographic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics, multivariate analyses were performed examining the association between patient characteristics and receipt of brachytherapy.
RESULTS: In the study cohort, brachytherapy use reached a peak of 16.7% in 2002, and then steadily declined to a low of 8% in 2010. Of the 719,789 patients with available data for risk stratification, 41.1%, 35.3%, and 23.6%, respectively, met low, intermediate, and high National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk criteria. After adjustment, patients of increasing age and those with Medicare insurance were more likely to receive brachytherapy. In contrast, patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk disease, Medicaid insurance, increasing comorbidity count, and increasing year of diagnosis were less likely to receive brachytherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with localized prostate cancer who are treated at National Cancer Data Base institutions, there has been a steady decline in brachytherapy use since 2003. For low-risk patients, the declining use of brachytherapy monotherapy compared with more costly emerging therapies has significant health policy implications.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brachytherapy; clinical practice patterns; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; radiotherapy; use

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24737481      PMCID: PMC4429530          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  27 in total

1.  New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Gabriel I Barbash; Sherry A Glied
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research--IOM recommendations.

Authors:  John K Iglehart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The National Cancer Data base Report on increased use of brachytherapy for the treatment of patients with prostate carcinoma in the U.S.

Authors:  C J Mettlin; G P Murphy; C J McDonald; H R Menck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Declining use of brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Usama Mahmood; Thomas Pugh; Steven Frank; Lawrence Levy; Gary Walker; Waqar Haque; Matthew Koshy; William Graber; David Swanson; Karen Hoffman; Deborah Kuban; Andrew Lee
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Transperineal 125iodine seed implantation in prostatic cancer guided by transrectal ultrasonography.

Authors:  H H Holm; N Juul; J F Pedersen; H Hansen; I Strøyer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Cumulative cost pattern comparison of prostate cancer treatments.

Authors:  Leslie S Wilson; Ross Tesoro; Eric P Elkin; Natalia Sadetsky; Jeanette M Broering; David M Latini; Janeen DuChane; Reema R Mody; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Long-term outcome for clinically localized prostate cancer treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy.

Authors:  Al V Taira; Gregory S Merrick; Wayne M Butler; Robert W Galbreath; Jonathan Lief; Edward Adamovich; Kent E Wallner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prostate cancer modality time trend analyses from 1973 to 2004: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry analysis.

Authors:  Ashesh B Jani; Peter A S Johnstone; Stanley L Liauw; Viraj A Master; Peter J Rossi
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.339

10.  The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  20 in total

1.  Disparities in care for patients with curable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Richard S Hoehn; Dennis J Hanseman; Peter L Jernigan; Koffi Wima; Audrey E Ertel; Daniel E Abbott; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Defining the value framework for prostate brachytherapy using patient-centered outcome metrics and time-driven activity-based costing.

Authors:  Nikhil G Thaker; Thomas J Pugh; Usama Mahmood; Seungtaek Choi; Tracy E Spinks; Neil E Martin; Terence T Sio; Rajat J Kudchadker; Robert S Kaplan; Deborah A Kuban; David A Swanson; Peter F Orio; Michael J Zelefsky; Brett W Cox; Louis Potters; Thomas A Buchholz; Thomas W Feeley; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Brachytherapy: where has it gone?

Authors:  Daniel G Petereit; Steven J Frank; Akila N Viswanathan; Beth Erickson; Patricia Eifel; Paul L Nguyen; David E Wazer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  A review of rectal toxicity following permanent low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and the potential value of biodegradable rectal spacers.

Authors:  M E Schutzer; P F Orio; M C Biagioli; D A Asher; H Lomas; D Moghanaki
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  Low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) as monotherapy for early stage prostate cancer in Italy: practice and outcome analysis in a series of 2237 patients from 11 institutions.

Authors:  Giovanni Fellin; Maria A Mirri; Luigi Santoro; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Claudio Divan; Salvatore Mussari; Francesco Ziglio; Beniamino La Face; Fernando Barbera; Michela Buglione; Laura Bandera; Barbara Ghedi; Nadia G Di Muzio; Andrea Losa; Paola Mangili; Luciano Nava; Renato Chiarlone; Nunzia Ciscognetti; Emilio Gastaldi; Federica Cattani; Ruggero Spoto; Andrea Vavassori; Francesca R Giglioli; Alessia Guarneri; Valentina Cerboneschi; Marcello Mignogna; Mauro Paoluzzi; Valentina Ravaglia; Costanza Chiumento; Stefania Clemente; Vincenzo Fusco; Roberto Santini; Marco Stefanacci; Francesco P Mangiacotti; Marco Martini; Tiziana Palloni; Giuseppe Schinaia; Grazia Lazzari; Giovanni Silvano; Stefano Magrini; Umberto Ricardi; Riccardo Santoni; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  The impact of trainee involvement on outcomes in low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Talha Shaikh; Lora Wang; Karen Ruth; Mark Hallman; David Y Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Jinsheng Li; Kevin Crawford; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Influence of Geography on Prostate Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Chad Tang; Xiudong Lei; Grace L Smith; Hubert Y Pan; Karen E Hoffman; Rachit Kumar; Brian F Chapin; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Steven J Frank; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Utilization of prostate brachytherapy for low risk prostate cancer: Is the decline overstated?

Authors:  Joseph Safdieh; Andrew Wong; Joseph P Weiner; David Schwartz; David Schreiber
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-08-23

10.  Near-infrared fluorescence imaging platform for quantifying in vivo nanoparticle diffusion from drug loaded implants.

Authors:  Stacey Markovic; Jodi Belz; Rajiv Kumar; Robert A Cormack; Srinivas Sridhar; Mark Niedre
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.