PURPOSE: In 2005 the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors issued a requirement that all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) be registered primarily to prevent selective reporting (publication bias). However, registries allow for alterations in study protocol. Changes occurring before (or after) study completion could invalidate the original study intent, leading to publication of misleading conclusions. In RCTs involving critically ill patients, these concerns may be particularly acute because mortality is high and conditions investigated are usually syndromes rather than specific diseases. This study was conducted to estimate the registration rate of RCTs in critical care; and, among registered RCTs, to determine timing of registration and whether sample size or primary outcome were altered. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE database for RCTs that began after or continued through July 2005. We determined whether each trial had been registered and, for registered trials, compared registry data to data in the published manuscript. RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds (66%) of trials were registered. Of these, 66% of registrations occurred after enrolment had commenced. Overall, 6% (5/90) of trials appropriately registered a sample size which was unchanged from the interval between registration and publication, and only 12% (11/90) reported primary outcomes that were both appropriately registered and unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Non-registration, or registration after trial initiation, are common in RCTs of critically ill patients. Among registered trials important protocol changes are often made between trial commencement and publication. This study identifies and quantifies the extent of this serious-but correctable-problem for RCTs in critically ill patients.
PURPOSE: In 2005 the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors issued a requirement that all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) be registered primarily to prevent selective reporting (publication bias). However, registries allow for alterations in study protocol. Changes occurring before (or after) study completion could invalidate the original study intent, leading to publication of misleading conclusions. In RCTs involving critically illpatients, these concerns may be particularly acute because mortality is high and conditions investigated are usually syndromes rather than specific diseases. This study was conducted to estimate the registration rate of RCTs in critical care; and, among registered RCTs, to determine timing of registration and whether sample size or primary outcome were altered. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE database for RCTs that began after or continued through July 2005. We determined whether each trial had been registered and, for registered trials, compared registry data to data in the published manuscript. RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds (66%) of trials were registered. Of these, 66% of registrations occurred after enrolment had commenced. Overall, 6% (5/90) of trials appropriately registered a sample size which was unchanged from the interval between registration and publication, and only 12% (11/90) reported primary outcomes that were both appropriately registered and unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Non-registration, or registration after trial initiation, are common in RCTs of critically illpatients. Among registered trials important protocol changes are often made between trial commencement and publication. This study identifies and quantifies the extent of this serious-but correctable-problem for RCTs in critically illpatients.
Authors: Oscar J Bienvenu; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Victor D Dinglas; Carl Shanholtz; Nadia Husain; Cheryl R Dennison; Margaret S Herridge; Peter J Pronovost; Dale M Needham Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Catherine De Angelis; Jeffrey M Drazen; Frank A Frizelle; Charlotte Haug; John Hoey; Richard Horton; Sheldon Kotzin; Christine Laine; Ana Marusic; A John P M Overbeke; Torben V Schroeder; Hal C Sox; Martin B Van Der Weyden Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-09-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dirk Bassler; Matthias Briel; Victor M Montori; Melanie Lane; Paul Glasziou; Qi Zhou; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Stephen D Walter; Gordon H Guyatt; David N Flynn; Mohamed B Elamin; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Nisrin O Abu Elnour; Julianna F Lampropulos; Amit Sood; Rebecca J Mullan; Patricia J Erwin; Clare R Bankhead; Rafael Perera; Carolina Ruiz Culebro; John J You; Sohail M Mulla; Jagdeep Kaur; Kara A Nerenberg; Holger Schünemann; Deborah J Cook; Kristina Lutz; Christine M Ribic; Noah Vale; German Malaga; Elie A Akl; Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Gerard Urrutia; Regina Kunz; Heiner C Bucher; Alain J Nordmann; Heike Raatz; Suzana Alves da Silva; Fabio Tuche; Brigitte Strahm; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Neill K J Adhikari; Edward J Mills; Femida Gwadry-Sridhar; Haresh Kirpalani; Heloisa P Soares; Paul J Karanicolas; Karen E A Burns; Per Olav Vandvik; Fernando Coto-Yglesias; Pedro Paulo M Chrispim; Tim Ramsay Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mark Unroe; Jeremy M Kahn; Shannon S Carson; Joseph A Govert; Tereza Martinu; Shailaja J Sathy; Alison S Clay; Jessica Chia; Alice Gray; James A Tulsky; Christopher E Cox Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Margaret S Herridge; Catherine M Tansey; Andrea Matté; George Tomlinson; Natalia Diaz-Granados; Andrew Cooper; Cameron B Guest; C David Mazer; Sangeeta Mehta; Thomas E Stewart; Paul Kudlow; Deborah Cook; Arthur S Slutsky; Angela M Cheung Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Melanie Sekeres; Jennifer L Gold; An-Wen Chan; Joel Lexchin; David Moher; Marleen L P Van Laethem; James Maskalyk; Lorraine Ferris; Nathan Taback; Paula A Rochon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christopher W Jones; Benjamin S Misemer; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Rosa Ahn; Alexandra Woodbridge; Ann Abraham; Susan Saba; Deborah Korenstein; Erin Madden; Salomeh Keyhani Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Christopher W Jones; Lukas G Keil; Wesley C Holland; Melissa C Caughey; Timothy F Platts-Mills Journal: BMC Med Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 8.775