Literature DB >> 24736830

Yield and utility of routine postoperative imaging after resection of brain metastases.

Ronald J Benveniste1, Nicholas Ferraro2, Asterios Tsimpas3.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) is routinely performed after resection of brain metastases (BrM), regardless of whether there are specific clinical concerns about residual tumor or potential complications. Routine imaging studies contribute a significant amount to the cost of medical care, and their yield and utility are unknown. An IRB-approved retrospective chart review study was performed to analyze all craniotomies for BrM performed at our institution from 2005 to 2012. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify the yield of postoperative imaging. 218 consecutive patients underwent 226 craniotomies for BrM. In 21 cases, new or worsened neurologic deficits occurred after surgery (9.0%), and 19 of the 21 underwent postoperative imaging. 9 of the 19 patients (47%) had significant findings on postoperative imaging, and 2 patients required reoperation. 201 patients had no new neurologic deficits (91%), and 23 of these patients had no postoperative imaging. Of the 178 remaining patients, 160 underwent postoperative MRI and 18 underwent postoperative CT. 9 patients (5.1%) had unexpected adverse imaging findings; 6 had small stroke, 1 had a subdural hemorrhage and 2 had possible or definite venous sinus occlusion. None of the imaging findings led to changes in management. 182 patients underwent imaging appropriate to detect residual tumor (177 gadolinium enhanced MRI and 5 contrast enhanced CT). Of these patients, 16 were known to have small residual tumors based on intraoperative findings. Of the remaining 166 patients felt to have had gross total tumor resection, 9 (5.4%) were found to have a small amount of residual tumor on postoperative imaging; no patient had a change in treatment plan as a result. Routine postoperative imaging in patients undergoing craniotomy for BrM has a very low yield and may not be appropriate in the absence of new neurologic deficits, or specific clinical concerns about large amounts of residual tumor or intraoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24736830     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1440-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  10 in total

1.  Epidemiology of brain metastases.

Authors:  Lakshmi Nayak; Eudocia Quant Lee; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Neurosurgical outcomes in a modern series of 400 craniotomies for treatment of parenchymal tumors.

Authors:  R Sawaya; M Hammoud; D Schoppa; K R Hess; S Z Wu; W M Shi; D M Wildrick
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Postoperative ischemic changes following brain metastasis resection as measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jens Gempt; Julia Gerhardt; Vivien Toth; Stefanie Hüttinger; Yu-Mi Ryang; Maria Wostrack; Sandro M Krieg; Bernhard Meyer; Annette Förschler; Florian Ringel
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  A randomized trial of surgery in the treatment of single metastases to the brain.

Authors:  R A Patchell; P A Tibbs; J W Walsh; R J Dempsey; Y Maruyama; R J Kryscio; W R Markesbery; J S Macdonald; B Young
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Cavity volume dynamics after resection of brain metastases and timing of postresection cavity stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Banu Atalar; Clara Y H Choi; Griffith R Harsh; Steven D Chang; Iris C Gibbs; John R Adler; Scott G Soltys
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Reevaluation of surgery for the treatment of brain metastases: review of 208 patients with single or multiple brain metastases treated at one institution with modern neurosurgical techniques.

Authors:  Sun Ha Paek; Paul B Audu; Michael R Sperling; Joon Cho; David W Andrews
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 7.  The role of radiosurgery to the tumor bed after resection of brain metastases.

Authors:  Jared H Gans; Daniel M S Raper; Ashish H Shah; Amade Bregy; Deborah Heros; Brian E Lally; Jacques J Morcos; Roberto C Heros; Ricardo J Komotar
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Image-guided craniotomy for cerebral metastases: techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Tze-Ching Tan; Peter McL Black
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  An evidence-based approach to the efficient use of computed tomography imaging in the neurosurgical patient.

Authors:  Matthew C Garrett; Arzu Bilgin-Freiert; Christine Bartels; Richard Everson; Nasim Afsarmanesh; Nader Pouratian
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery without whole-brain radiation therapy for brain metastases: potential role of preoperative tumor size.

Authors:  Alan C Hartford; Anthony J Paravati; William J Spire; Zhongze Li; Lesley A Jarvis; Camilo E Fadul; C Harker Rhodes; Kadir Erkmen; Jonathan Friedman; David J Gladstone; Eugen B Hug; David W Roberts; Nathan E Simmons
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 7.038

  10 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  The impact of cerebral metastases growth pattern on neurosurgical treatment.

Authors:  Marcel A Kamp; Philipp J Slotty; Jan F Cornelius; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Marion Rapp; Michael Sabel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Routine postoperative computed tomography scan after craniotomy: systematic review and evidence-based recommendations.

Authors:  Lukas Blumrich; João Paulo Mota Telles; Saul Almeida da Silva; Ricardo Ferrareto Iglesio; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  MRI-Based Risk Assessment for Incomplete Resection of Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Tizian Rosenstock; Paul Pöser; David Wasilewski; Hans-Christian Bauknecht; Ulrike Grittner; Thomas Picht; Martin Misch; Julia Sophie Onken; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling shows high diagnostic performance in the detection of postoperative residual lesion in hyper-vascularised adult brain tumours.

Authors:  Clara Cohen; Bruno Law-Ye; Didier Dormont; Delphine Leclercq; Laurent Capelle; Marc Sanson; Damien Galanaud; Nadya Pyatigorskaya
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Risk factors for in-brain local progression in elderly patients after resection of cerebral metastases.

Authors:  Christopher Munoz-Bendix; Marion Rapp; Hendrik-Jan Mijderwijk; Christiane von Sass; Maxine Dibué-Adjei; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Bernd Turowski; Michael Sabel; Marcel A Kamp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Tumor-associated epilepsy in patients with brain metastases: necrosis-to-tumor ratio forecasts postoperative seizure freedom.

Authors:  Matthias Schneider; Patrick Schuss; Majd Bahna; Muriel Heimann; Christian Bode; Valeri Borger; Lars Eichhorn; Erdem Güresir; Motaz Hamed; Ulrich Herrlinger; Yon-Dschun Ko; Felix Lehmann; Anna-Laura Potthoff; Alexander Radbruch; Christina Schaub; Rainer Surges; Johannes Weller; Hartmut Vatter; Niklas Schäfer
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  5-ALA fluorescence of cerebral metastases and its impact for the local-in-brain progression.

Authors:  Marcel A Kamp; Igor Fischer; Julia Bühner; Bernd Turowski; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Marion Rapp; Philipp J Slotty; Michael Sabel
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-11

8.  Perioperative imaging in patients treated with resection of brain metastases: a survey by the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) Youngsters committee.

Authors:  Barbara Kiesel; Carina M Thomé; Tobias Weiss; Asgeir S Jakola; Amélie Darlix; Alessia Pellerino; Julia Furtner; Johannes Kerschbaumer; Christian F Freyschlag; Wolfgang Wick; Matthias Preusser; Georg Widhalm; Anna S Berghoff
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects.

Authors:  Martin A Proescholdt; Petra Schödel; Christian Doenitz; Tobias Pukrop; Julius Höhne; Nils Ole Schmidt; Karl-Michael Schebesch
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.