Literature DB >> 24736160

Competing views on cancer.

Carlos Sonnenschein1, Ana M Soto, Annapoorni Rangarajan, Prakash Kulkarni.   

Abstract

Despite intense research efforts that have provided enormous insight, cancer continues to be a poorly understood disease. There has been much debate over whether the cancerous state can be said to originate in a single cell or whether it is a reflection of aberrant behaviour on the part of a 'society of cells'. This article presents, in the form of a debate conducted among the authors, three views of how the problem might be addressed. We do not claim that the views exhaust all possibilities. These views are (a) the tissue organization field theory (TOFT) that is based on a breakdown of tissue organization involving many cells from different embryological layers, (b) the cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis that focuses on genetic and epigenetic changes that take place within single cells, and (c) the proposition that rewiring of the cell's protein interaction networks mediated by intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) drives the tumorigenic process. The views are based on different philosophical approaches. In detail, they differ on some points and agree on others. It is left to the reader to decide whether one approach to understanding cancer appears more promising than the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24736160      PMCID: PMC4136489          DOI: 10.1007/s12038-013-9403-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  145 in total

Review 1.  Transcriptional mechanisms of developmental cell cycle arrest: problems and models.

Authors:  Mathilde Devès; Franck Bourrat
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 2.  Cancer stem cells: mirage or reality?

Authors:  Piyush B Gupta; Christine L Chaffer; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 3.  Opinion: migrating cancer stem cells - an integrated concept of malignant tumour progression.

Authors:  Thomas Brabletz; Andreas Jung; Simone Spaderna; Falk Hlubek; Thomas Kirchner
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  A majority of the cancer/testis antigens are intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Krithika Rajagopalan; Steven M Mooney; Nehal Parekh; Robert H Getzenberg; Prakash Kulkarni
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.429

5.  The tissue organization field theory of cancer: a testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory.

Authors:  Ana M Soto; Carlos Sonnenschein
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 6.  Neutralizing tumor-promoting chronic inflammation: a magic bullet?

Authors:  Lisa M Coussens; Laurence Zitvogel; A Karolina Palucka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Cancer stem cells in solid tumors: elusive or illusive?

Authors:  Yvonne Welte; James Adjaye; Hans R Lehrach; Christian Ra Regenbrecht
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 8.  The cancer genome.

Authors:  Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Lineage tracing reveals Lgr5+ stem cell activity in mouse intestinal adenomas.

Authors:  Arnout G Schepers; Hugo J Snippert; Daniel E Stange; Maaike van den Born; Johan H van Es; Marc van de Wetering; Hans Clevers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Plausibility of stromal initiation of epithelial cancers without a mutation in the epithelium: a computer simulation of morphostats.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Ana M Soto; Carlos Sonnenschein; Antonio Cappuccio; John D Potter; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  21 in total

1.  A cancer theory kerfuffle can lead to new lines of research.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Quarterly intrinsic disorder digest (April-May-June, 2014).

Authors:  Shelly DeForte; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Intrinsically Disord Proteins       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 3.  Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Critical Components of the Wetware.

Authors:  Prakash Kulkarni; Supriyo Bhattacharya; Srisairam Achuthan; Amita Behal; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Sourabh Kotnala; Atish Mohanty; Govindan Rangarajan; Ravi Salgia; Vladimir Uversky
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 4.  Revisiting the hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  Yousef Ahmed Fouad; Carmen Aanei
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Cancer Metastases: So Close and So Far.

Authors:  Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Protein conformational dynamics and phenotypic switching.

Authors:  Prakash Kulkarni; Srisairam Achuthan; Supriyo Bhattacharya; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Sourabh Kotnala; Vitor B P Leite; Atish Mohanty; John Orban; Susmita Roy; Govindan Rangarajan; Ravi Salgia
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2021-11-27

7.  Just like the rest of evolution in Mother Nature, the evolution of cancers may be driven by natural selection, and not by haphazard mutations.

Authors:  Ju Zhang; Xiaomin Lou; Lucas Zellmer; Siqi Liu; Ningzhi Xu; D Joshua Liao
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2014-09-22

8.  Ion channel gene expression predicts survival in glioma patients.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Christopher I Gurguis; Wanjun Gu; Eun A Ko; Inja Lim; Hyoweon Bang; Tong Zhou; Jae-Hong Ko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Tumor and the microenvironment: a chance to reframe the paradigm of carcinogenesis?

Authors:  Mariano Bizzarri; Alessandra Cucina
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  A novel pathogenic classification of cancers.

Authors:  Carlos Sonnenschein; Barbara Davis; Ana M Soto
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 5.722

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.