Literature DB >> 24736073

Comparison of clinical outcomes following gefitinib and erlotinib treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer patients harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in either exon 19 or 21.

Sung Hee Lim1, Ji Yun Lee, Jong-Mu Sun, Jin Seok Ahn, Keunchil Park, Myung-Ju Ahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib and erlotinib, small-molecule kinase inhibitors that block epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling, have demonstrated a dramatic response rate and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients harboring an activating EGFR mutation. We compared the clinical outcomes in gefitinib- and erlotinib-treated patients harboring EGFR mutations who had recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: A total of 375 patients with recurrent or metastatic stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, who had either exon 19 deletion or the L858R mutation in exon 21, and had received either gefitinib (n = 228) or erlotinib (n = 147), were included in the study. A matched-pair case-control study design was implemented in the analysis, where 121 pairs of gefitinib-treated and erlotinib-treated patients were matched according to sex, smoking history, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and types of EGFR mutation.
RESULTS: The median age of all patients was 58 years (range, 30-84), and more than half of patients had never been smokers (63.6%). Most patients had adenocarcinoma (98.3%) and good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0, 1) (90.9%). The median number of cycles of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment was 12.7 in the gefitinib group and 10.8 in the erlotinib group. Of the 242 patients, 63 (26%) received EGFR TKI as first-line therapy. The overall response rates and disease control rates in the gefitinib- or erlotinib-treated groups were 76.9% versus 74.4% (p = 0.575) and 90.1% versus 86.8%, respectively (p = 0.305). There was no statistically significant difference with regard to PFS (median, 11.7 versus 9.6; p = 0.056) between the gefitinib- and erlotinib-treated groups. For patients receiving EGFR TKI as the first-line treatment, there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in overall response rates (76.7% and 90.0%) (p = 0.431) and median PFS (11.7 versus 14.5 months) (p = 0.507).
CONCLUSION: In NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutation, treatment with gefitinib and erlotinib resulted in similar effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24736073     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  19 in total

Review 1.  Predictive approaches for drug combination discovery in cancer.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Madani Tonekaboni; Laleh Soltan Ghoraie; Venkata Satya Kumar Manem; Benjamin Haibe-Kains
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 2.  Treatment choice in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma: latest evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Oscar Juan; Sanjay Popat
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 3.  Progress of EGFR-TKI and ALK/ROS1 inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Liangqing Ge; Ruizheng Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

4.  Comparison of the effectiveness of erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in patients with common and rare EGFR gene mutations.

Authors:  Pawel Krawczyk; Dariusz M Kowalski; Rodryg Ramlau; Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Kinga Winiarczyk; Katarzyna Stencel; Tomasz Powrózek; Katarzyna Reszka; Kamila Wojas-Krawczyk; Maciej Bryl; Magdalena Wójcik-Superczyńska; Maciej Głogowski; Aleksander Barinow-Wojewódzki; Janusz Milanowski; Maciej Krzakowski
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Impact of metastatic status on the prognosis of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Taniguchi; Akihiro Tamiya; Kenji Nakahama; Yoko Naoki; Masaki Kanazu; Naoki Omachi; Kyoichi Okishio; Takahiko Kasai; Shinji Atagi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Pharmacogenomics of EGFR-targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer: EGFR and beyond.

Authors:  Christopher Delaney; Samuel Frank; R Stephanie Huang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-08

7.  Digoxin Suppresses Tumor Malignancy through Inhibiting Multiple Src-Related Signaling Pathways in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Sheng-Yi Lin; Hsiu-Hui Chang; Yi-Hua Lai; Ching-Hsiung Lin; Min-Hsuan Chen; Gee-Chen Chang; Meng-Feng Tsai; Jeremy J W Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Role of rebiopsy in relapsed non-small cell lung cancer for directing oncology treatments.

Authors:  Antti P Jekunen
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  Impact of Smoking and Brain Metastasis on Outcomes of Advanced EGFR Mutation Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with First Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Amit Jain; Cindy Lim; Eugene MingJin Gan; David Zhihao Ng; Quan Sing Ng; Mei Kim Ang; Angela Takano; Kian Sing Chan; Wu Meng Tan; Ravindran Kanesvaran; Chee Keong Toh; Chian Min Loo; Anne Ann Ling Hsu; Anantham Devanand; Chong Hee Lim; Heng Nung Koong; Tina Koh; Kam Weng Fong; Swee Peng Yap; Su Woon Kim; Balram Chowbay; Lynette Oon; Kiat Hon Lim; Wan Teck Lim; Eng Huat Tan; Daniel Shao Weng Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diet-derived 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 activates vitamin D receptor target gene expression and suppresses EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer growth in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Alissa R Verone-Boyle; Suzanne Shoemaker; Kristopher Attwood; Carl D Morrison; Andrew J Makowski; Sebastiano Battaglia; Pamela A Hershberger
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.