Literature DB >> 24736022

The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications.

Stephen J Lee1, Bianca Calderon1, Ginger J Gardner1, Allison Mays1, Stephanie Nolan1, Yukio Sonoda1, Richard R Barakat1, Mario M Leitao2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
METHODS: Same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy was initiated 07/2010. All cases from then through 12/2012 were captured for quality assessment monitoring. The distance from the hospital to patients' homes was determined using http://maps.google.com. Procedures were categorized as simple (TLH+/-BSO) or complex (TLH+/-BSO with sentinel node mapping, pelvic and/or aortic nodal dissection, appendectomy, or omentectomy). Urgent care center (UCC) visits and readmissions within 30days of surgery were captured, and time to the visit was determined from the initial surgical date.
RESULTS: Same-day discharge was planned in 200 cases. Median age was 52years (range, 30-78), BMI was 26.8kg/m(2) (range, 17.4-56.8), and ASA was class 2 (range, 1-3). Median distance traveled was 31.5miles (range, 0.2-149). Procedures were simple in 109 (55%) and complex in 91 (45%) cases. The indication for surgery was: endometrial cancer (n=82; 41%), ovarian cancer (n=5; 2.5%), cervical cancer (n=8; 4%), and non-gynecologic cancer/benign (n=105; 53%). One hundred fifty-seven (78%) had successful same-day discharge. Median time for discharge for these cases was 4.8h (range, 2.4-10.3). Operative time, case ending before 6pm, and use of intraoperative ketorolac were associated with successful same-day discharge. UCC visits occurred in 8/157 (5.1%) same-day discharge cases compared to 5/43 (11.6%) requiring admission (P=.08). Readmission was necessary in 4/157 (2.5%) same-day discharge cases compared to 3/43 (7.0%) requiring admission (P=.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign and malignant conditions is feasible and safe.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BSO; Robotic-assisted hysterectomy; Same-day discharge; TLH

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24736022     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  10 in total

1.  30-Day unanticipated healthcare encounters after prolapse surgery: impact of same day discharge.

Authors:  Anna L Romanova; Charelle Carter-Brooks; Kristine M Ruppert; Halina M Zyczynski
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Rebi Nahum Halloway; Jennifer Heim; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Colleen Rivard
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for severe deep endometriosis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ROBEndo trial).

Authors:  Anna Maria Terho; Johanna Mäkelä-Kaikkonen; Pasi Ohtonen; Outi Uimari; Terhi Puhto; Tero Rautio; Sari Koivurova
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Factors influencing same-day hospital discharge and risk factors for readmission after robotic surgery in the gynecologic oncology patient population.

Authors:  Colleen Rivard; Kelly Casserly; Mary Anderson; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Deanna Teoh
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.137

5.  Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.

Authors:  Natalia Povolotskaya; Robert Woolas; Dirk Brinkmann
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-15

Review 6.  Robotic surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  Rooma Sinha; Madhumati Sanjay; B Rupa; Samita Kumari
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Enhanced Recovery Programs in an Ambulatory Surgical Oncology Center.

Authors:  Anoushka M Afonso; Patrick J McCormick; Melissa J Assel; Elizabeth Rieth; Kara Barnett; Hanae K Tokita; Geema Masson; Vincent Laudone; Brett A Simon; Rebecca S Twersky
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Qualitative Interview Study of Gynecologic Oncologist Utilization of Recommended Same-Day Discharge Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sophia Bunde; Shalkar Adambekov; Ella Glikson; Faina Linkov
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-30

9.  Risk factors for unplanned admission following surgical repair of apical prolapse.

Authors:  Henry H Chill; Nani P Moss; Cecilia Chang; Joel Winer; Roger P Goldberg
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 1.932

10.  Use of Paracervical Block Before Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Rachel L Barr Grzesh; Alejandro D Treszezamsky; Suzanne S Fenske; Lauren G Rascoff; Erin L Moshier; Charles Ascher-Walsh
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.