Literature DB >> 24735130

Usefulness of Succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB) immunohistochemistry in guiding mutational screening among patients with pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndromes.

Rekha Pai1, Marie Therese Manipadam, Pradyumn Singh, Andrew Ebenazer, Prasanna Samuel, Simon Rajaratnam.   

Abstract

Genetic testing of pheochromocytomas (PCC) and paragangliomas (PGL), although expensive, is gradually becoming a part of the routine laboratory investigation for patients with PCC-PGL syndrome. Recently, Succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB) immunochemistry has been shown to be an excellent indicator of germline mutations in the SDH genes and could help significantly reduce cost. This study assesses the utility of SDHB immunohistochemical analysis when used to guide genetic analysis, with emphasis on cost benefits it could provide in a resource-limited setting. Forty-four cases of PCC/PGL characterized by genetic analysis were included to determine their SDHB expression pattern by immunohistochemistry. SDHB antibody expression was negative among three cases each, with SDHB and SDHD mutations. Immunohistochemistry results were positive for all three cases of RET, a single case of neurofibromatosis and for two cases with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) mutations while the remaining two cases with VHL mutations showed a diffuse 'cytoplasmic blush'. Thirty of the remaining 31 samples demonstrated positive staining and were negative for mutations, while a lone sample that was negative for staining and mutation was not included in the final analysis as the internal control for the sample was not adequately stained. Cost analysis in our settings showed that triaging with SDHB immunohistochemistry could potentially reduce costs by USD 320-500 per patient. SDHB immunohistochemistry, when used as a guide to genetic testing, can significantly reduce the effort, time and costs of testing among patients with PCC-PGL, a huge benefit in resource limited settings.
© 2014 APMIS. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SDHB; antibody; genetic screening; immunohistochemistry; pheochromocytoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24735130     DOI: 10.1111/apm.12269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  10 in total

Review 1.  What Have We Learned from Molecular Biology of Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas?

Authors:  Thomas G Papathomas; Diederik P D Suurd; Alfred K Lam; Ronald R de Krijger; Karel Pacak; Arthur S Tischler; Menno R Vriens
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.943

2.  A high-throughput analysis of the IDH1(R132H) protein expression in pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Olivera Casar-Borota; Kristin Astrid Berland Øystese; Magnus Sundström; Linea Melchior; Vera Popovic
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 3.  Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: recent updates in genetics, biochemistry, immunohistochemistry, metabolomics, imaging and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Karren Antonio; Ma Margarita Noreen Valdez; Leilani Mercado-Asis; David Taïeb; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-02

Review 4.  Data set for the reporting of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: explanations and recommendations of the guidelines from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting.

Authors:  Lester D R Thompson; Anthony J Gill; Sylvia L Asa; Roderick J Clifton-Bligh; Ronald R de Krijger; Noriko Kimura; Paul Komminoth; Ernest E Lack; Jacques W M Lenders; Ricardo V Lloyd; Thomas G Papathomas; Peter M Sadow; Arthur S Tischler
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Complete remission of metastatic pheochromocytoma in 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy after a single session of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy: a case report.

Authors:  Teruaki Sugino; Ryosuke Ando; Rei Unno; Keitaro Iida; Taku Naiki; Shuzo Hamamoto; Kentaro Mizuno; Atsushi Okada; Yukihiro Umemoto; Noriyasu Kawai; Keiichi Tozawa; Yutaro Hayashi; Anri Inaki; Daiki Kayano; Seigo Kinuya; Takahiro Yasui
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-12-19

Review 6.  When should genetic testing be performed in patients with neuroendocrine tumours?

Authors:  Triona O'Shea; Maralyn Druce
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 7.  Update of Pheochromocytoma Syndromes: Genetics, Biochemical Evaluation, and Imaging.

Authors:  Rami Alrezk; Andres Suarez; Isabel Tena; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  CytoJounal quiz case: Fine-needle aspiration of peripancreatic mass clinically mimicking a lymphoma.

Authors:  Adela Cimic; Natasha Rekhtman
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.091

9.  An integrated somatic and germline approach to aid interpretation of germline variants of uncertain significance in cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Alison Schwartz; Danielle K Manning; Diane R Koeller; Anu Chittenden; Raymond A Isidro; Connor P Hayes; Feruza Abraamyan; Monica Devi Manam; Meaghan Dwan; Justine A Barletta; Lynette M Sholl; Matthew B Yurgelun; Huma Q Rana; Judy E Garber; Arezou A Ghazani
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.738

10.  Genetic Profile of Indian Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Patients - A Single Institutional Study.

Authors:  Gaurav Agarwal; Sendhil Rajan; Ramya C Valiveru; Sonam Tulsyan; Vinita Agrawal; Balraj Mittal; Ghazala Zaidi; Sabaretnam Mayilvaganan; Anjali Mishra; Amit Agarwal; Saroj Kanta Mishra; Eesh Bhatia
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.