Literature DB >> 24734285

Immunological comparison of allergen immunotherapy tablet treatment and subcutaneous immunotherapy against grass allergy.

K Aasbjerg, V Backer, G Lund, J Holm, N C Nielsen, M Holse, V R Wagtmann, P A Würtzen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: IgE-mediated allergic rhinitis to grass pollen can successfully be treated with either allergen immunotherapy tablets (SLIT tablet) or SQ-standardized subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). The efficacy of these two treatment modalities for grass allergy is comparable, but the immunological mechanisms may differ. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01889875.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the immunological changes induced by SQ-standardized SCIT and SLIT tablet.
METHODS: We randomized 40 individuals with grass pollen rhinitis into groups receiving SCIT, SLIT tablet, or neither and followed them for 15 months with regular serum measurements of specific IgE, IgG4, IgE-blocking factor, facilitated antigen presentation (FAP), and basophil activation test (BAT). Nasal challenges were used to assess changes in nasal sensitivity.
RESULTS: After 15 months of treatment IgG4, IgE-blocking factor, FAP, and BAT values differed significantly in both SCIT and SLIT-tablet treatment groups when compared to the control group. Both SCIT and SLIT-tablet groups were significantly different from the control group after 1–3 months of treatment. In general, the changes induced by SCIT reached twice that of SLIT tablet, with the exception of specific IgE where SLIT tablet induced initial threefold increase compared with SCIT. A slight but significant increase in IgE and BAT after season was seen only in the control group. Significant differences between SCIT and SLIT tablet were observed early, but the differences diminished with the length of treatment, especially for FAP inhibition.
CONCLUSIONS: Both SCIT and SLIT tablet induce significant changes in specific antibodies (IgE and IgG4) and competition assays (IgE-blocking factor, FAP, and BAT). Overall, SCIT induced larger (two- to threefold) changes than SLIT tablet, with the exception of FAP, where SLIT tablet showed a gradual increase ending at the same level as SCIT. Maximal change was generally reached after 3 months' treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24734285     DOI: 10.1111/cea.12241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  17 in total

1.  Sublingual immunotherapy for 4 years increased the number of Foxp3+ Treg cells, which correlated with clinical effects.

Authors:  Tetsuya Terada; Masaya Matsuda; Miki Inaba; Junpei Hamaguchi; Naoki Takemoto; Yusuke Kikuoka; Yuko Inaka; Harumi Sakae; Kennosuke Hashimoto; Hayato Shimora; Kazuyuki Kitatani; Ryo Kawata; Takeshi Nabe
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 2.  Basic science for the clinician: Mechanisms of sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy.

Authors:  Monica G Lawrence; John W Steinke; Larry Borish
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 3.  Applications and mechanisms of immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Authors:  Jasper H Kappen; Stephen R Durham; Hans In 't Veen; Mohamed H Shamji
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.031

4.  Pulmonary Administration of Soluble Antigen Arrays Is Superior to Antigen in Treatment of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Christopher Kuehl; Sharadvi Thati; Bradley Sullivan; Joshua Sestak; Michael Thompson; Teruna Siahaan; Cory Berkland
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Distinct modulation of allergic T cell responses by subcutaneous vs. sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy.

Authors:  V Schulten; V Tripple; K Aasbjerg; V Backer; G Lund; P A Würtzen; A Sette; B Peters
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.018

6.  Changes in skin reactivity and associated factors in patients sensitized to house dust mites after 1 year of allergen-specific immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeop Son; Mann-Hong Jung; Kwang-Wook Koh; Eun-Kee Park; Jeong-Hoon Heo; Gil-Soon Choi; Hee-Kyoo Kim
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2017-04-27

Review 7.  A review of clinical efficacy, safety, new developments and adherence to allergen-specific immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis caused by allergy to ragweed pollen (Ambrosia artemisiifolia).

Authors:  Mirjana Turkalj; Ivana Banic; Srdjan Ante Anzic
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 8.  Update on Biomarkers to Monitor Clinical Efficacy Response During and Post Treatment in Allergen Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Lubna Kouser; Jasper Kappen; Ross P Walton; Mohamed H Shamji
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Allergy       Date:  2017-03-10

Review 9.  The Use of Biomarkers to Predict Aero-Allergen and Food Immunotherapy Responses.

Authors:  Sayantani B Sindher; Andrew Long; Swati Acharya; Vanitha Sampath; Kari C Nadeau
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 8.667

10.  Exploring novel systemic biomarker approaches in grass-pollen sublingual immunotherapy using omics.

Authors:  Tomas Clive Barker-Tejeda; Raphaelle Bazire; David Obeso; Leticia Mera-Berriatua; Domenico Rosace; Sonia Vazquez-Cortes; Tania Ramos; Maria Del Pilar Rico; Tomás Chivato; Coral Barbas; Alma Villaseñor; Maria M Escribese; Montserrat Fernández-Rivas; Carlos Blanco; Domingo Barber
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 13.146

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.