| Literature DB >> 24734201 |
Yasuhiko Hirose1, Taku Naiki2, Ryosuke Ando1, Akihiro Nakane3, Toshiki Etani2, Keitaro Iida2, Hidetoshi Akita3, Takehiko Okamura3, Kenjiro Kohri2.
Abstract
To reduce the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after radical cystectomy, a new closing method using subcutaneous continuous aspiration drain was developed and compared to the conventional closing method. The new method involved (a) closed aspiration with an indwelling aspiration drain without suture of the subcutaneous fat and (b) covering with hydrocolloid wound dressing after suture of the dermis with 4-0 absorbable thread and reinforcement using strips. The incidence of SSI was significantly improved by using the new method. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate analysis associated with SSI revealed that the new closing method was statistically correlated with 85% reduction of SSI (odds ratio: 0.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.69).Our new method using continuous aspiration with subcutaneous drain is useful for preventing SSI through removal of effusions and reduction of dead space by apposition of the subcutaneous fat.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24734201 PMCID: PMC3964757 DOI: 10.1155/2014/897451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Urol ISSN: 2090-5807
Figure 1Method of wound closure analyzed in this study. (a) Conventional method from 2002 to 2009. (b) New method from 2010 to 2012.
Figure 2Procedure of the new method. (a) Aspiration drain was subcutaneously indwelled. Arrow: closed drain. ((b) and (c)) Dermal suture using 4-0 absorbable thread. (d) Covering with hydrocolloid wound dressing and reinforcement using strips. Trigonal dot: hydrocolloid dressing; asterisk: strips.
Patients' characteristics and incidence of SSI between the two groups.
| Characteristics | Conventional method | New method |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr), mean ± SD | 67.9 ± 9.5 | 68.4 ± 11.0 | 0.81 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 23.3 ± 3.5 | 23.0 ± 3.4 | 0.74 |
| Op. time (min), mean ± SD | 470.8 ± 111.3 | 472.3 ± 93.0 | 0.95 |
| Blood loss (mL), mean ± SD | 2995.3 ± 2055.8 | 2364.3 ± 1183.2 | 0.07 |
| Subcutaneous fat thickness (mm), mean ± SD | 17.9 ± 6.8 | 17.9 ± 8.6 | 0.97 |
|
| |||
| Male patients, | 51 (81.0) | 20 (74.1) | 0.46 |
| Over weight and obese (BMI ≥ 25), | 22 (34.9) | 7 (25.9) | 0.40 |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 14 (22.2) | 2 (7.4) | 0.13 |
| Smoking, | 41 (65.1) | 15 (55.6) | 0.39 |
| Urinary diversion | 0.89 | ||
| Cutaneostomy, | 29 (46.0) | 12 (44.4) | |
| Bowel-utilizing diversion, | 34 (54.0) | 15 (55.6) | |
| SSI, | 22 (34.9) | 2 (7.4) | <0.01 |
| Superficial | 5 (7.9) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Deep | 14 (22.2) | 2 (7.4) | |
| Organ/space | 3 (4.8) | 0 (0.0) | |
SSI: surgical site infection; BMI: body mass index; Op. time: operation time
*P value by t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test.
Univariate and multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI) for SSI.
| Risk factors for SSI | Univariate model | Multivariate model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Age (per 10 years) | 0.82 | 0.51–1.32 | — | — |
| Male patients | 1.85 | 0.63–5.46 | — | — |
| Subcutaneous fat thickness (>20 mm) | 1.38 | 0.52–3.67 | 1.06 | 0.35–3.19 |
| Over weight and obese (BMI ≥ 25) | 2.26 | 0.86–5.94 | 1.97 | 0.70–5.55 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 2.61 | 0.85–8.05 | 2.83 | 0.89–8.98 |
| Smoking | 1.30 | 0.49–3.47 | 1.78 | 0.58–9.90 |
| Op. time (>600 min) | 2.44 | 0.60–10.0 | 2.39 | 0.58–9.90 |
| Blood loss (>1500 mL) | 1.60 | 0.48–5.38 | 1.39 | 0.40–4.84 |
| Cutaneostomy | 1.02 | 0.40–2.59 | 1.10 | 0.41–2.95 |
| New closing method | 0.15 | 0.03–0.69 | 0.14 | 0.03–0.64 |
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; SSI: surgical site infection; BMI: body mass index; Op. time: operation time.
Multivariate model: adjusted for age and gender.