| Literature DB >> 24734109 |
Chun-Yen Chen1, Chao-Nan Lin2, Rey-Shyong Chern2, Yu-Chuan Tsai3, Yung-Hsien Chang4, Chi-Hsien Chien2.
Abstract
Aquapuncture is a modified acupuncture technique and it is generally accepted that it has a greater therapeutic effect than acupuncture because of the combination of the acupoint stimulation and the pharmacological effect of the drugs. However, to date, the mechanisms underlying the effects of aquapuncture remain unclear. We hypothesized that both the change in the local spatial configuration and the substrate stimulation of aquapuncture would activate neuronal signaling. Thus, bee venom, normal saline, and vitamins B1 and B12 were injected into a Zusanli (ST36) acupoint as substrate of aquapuncture, whereas a dry needle was inserted into ST36 as a control. After aquapuncture, activated neurons expressing Fos protein were mainly observed in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord in lumbar segments L3-5, with the distribution nearly identical among all groups. However, the bee venom injection induced significantly more Fos-expressing neurons than the other substrates. Based on these data, we suggest that changes in the spatial configuration of the acupoint activate neuronal signaling and that bee venom may further strengthen this neuronal activity. In conclusion, the mechanisms for the effects of aquapuncture appear to be the spatial configuration changes occurring within the acupoint and the ability of injected substrates to stimulate neuronal activity.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24734109 PMCID: PMC3963215 DOI: 10.1155/2014/627342
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Substrates of aquapuncture injection and dry needle insertion into ST36 induce Fos expression in 3rd, 4th, and 5th lumbar spinal dorsal horn.
| Bee venom | Normal saline | Vitamin B1 | Vitamin B12 | Dry needle | Sham control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3 | 105.4 ± 29.4 | 40.0 ± 9.7 | 29.4 ± 5.3 | 41.8 ± 11.0 | 31.6 ± 6.7 | 2.4 ± 0.5 |
| L4 | 101.1 ± 28.1 | 40.5 ± 10.0 | 23.7 ± 5.2 | 29.0 ± 1.6 | 22.8 ± 4.9 | 2.0 ± 1.7 |
| L5 | 86.3 ± 8.0 | 35.6 ± 8.6 | 29.4 ± 6.8 | 28.8 ± 4.2 | 24.5 ± 6.5 | 2.7 ± 2.1 |
|
| ||||||
| Sum | 292.8 ± 60.7 | 116.1 ± 28.2 | 82.4 ± 16.8 | 99.5 ± 15.5 | 78.8 ± 3.8 | 7.1 ± 0.3 |
Figure 1The mean number of Fos expression neurons in L3–5 spinal dorsal horn between bee venom, normal saline, vitamin B1, vitamin B12 injection, and dry needle groups. Fos expression neurons of bee venom group were significantly more than normal saline, vitamins B1 and B12, dry needle, and sham control groups. There is no markedly difference between normal saline, vitamins B1 and B12, and dry needle groups. The sham control group expressed significantly lesser Fos expression neurons than the other groups. *P < 0.05.
Figure 2Distribution of Fos expression in laminae I~V of 3rd, 4th, and 5th lumbar spinal cord after the ST36 acupoint stimulation. (A, a) Bee venom group; (B, b) normal saline group; (C, c) vitamin B1 group; (D, d) vitamin B12 group; (E, e) dry needle insertion group; (F, f) sham control group; (scale bar: 100 um).