| Literature DB >> 24734079 |
Mahsima Khoshneviszadeh1, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani2, Mohammad Reza Namazi3, Ali Noorafshan4, Bita Geramizadeh5, Ramin Miri1.
Abstract
Wounds and wound healing have always been one of the most important subjects that experimental researches were dedicated to. Simvastatin has been used for long as a common lipid lowering agent which was reported to have some pleiotropic effects such as antioxidation, anti-inflammation and immunomodulation. In this study we aimed to determine the effect of simvastatin on wound healing process in laboratory rats by means of stereological and histopathological analyses. 36 male Sprague-Dawley rats (220 ± 20 g) with a 1 cm(2) circular full-thickness wound on their back were divided into three groups: SS group that received a gel with 2% concentration of simvastatin; UW group that received no treatment but daily irrigation with normal saline; Base group that was treated with the gel base. Duration of the study was 12 days and at the end, wound closure rate, grade of inflammation, granulation-tissue formation, ulceration, epithelization, fibroblast proliferation, collagen-bundles synthesis, and vascularization were determined. Outcome of this study revealed that Simvastatin improves the wound healing by its anti-inflammatory and epithelization induction effect as well as statistically significant induction of fibroblast proliferation and collagen bundle synthesis which were reported by our stereological and histopathological investigations. Results of the present study demonstrated that topical Simvastatin enhances the wound healing process through affecting different aspects of tissue regeneration; however, further researches are needed to find the exact mechanism, advantages and disadvantages of this chemical agent.Entities:
Keywords: Reepithelization; Simvastatin; Stereology; Wound healing
Year: 2014 PMID: 24734079 PMCID: PMC3985244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Criteria used for light microscopy analysis
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic; Dominancy of chronic inflammatory cells in the field | Acute; Dominancy of neutrophils among all cells in the field |
| ||
| Present(1) | Absent(0) |
| ||
| Present(1) | Absent(0) |
| ||
| Full, covering 100%of the wound(3) | Moderate; covering > 50% of the wound(2) | Slight; covering < 50% of the wound(1) | Absent(0) |
|
Figure 1Digital photographs were captured from the wound surfaces every four days to measure the wound area. The total number of points within the wound borders (yellow line) was counted. As it is shown at the corner of this Figure, the right upper corner of the cross is considered as the point (arrow), and it is counted only if the right upper corner hits the wound surface. (1): day 1, (2): day 4; (3) day 8; (4) day 12 of Simvastatin-treated group
Figure 2The volume density (Vv (collagen/dermis)) of the collagen fibers was estimated using a grid of points on the live image of dermis. The total number of points hitting the bundles is counted and divided by the total number of points hitting the reference space (dermis). A cross is presented at the corner of this figure. The cross is counted only if the right upper corner (arrow) hits the tissue. (Hedenhain's azan stain) (×450).
Figure 3A: An unbiased counting frame is laid on the monitor image of wound dermis at final magnification of 450 randomly for estimation of the vessel’s length density (LV) and mean diameter. Any vessel lied in the counting frame or touched the inclusion borders (dotted lines) are selected. The vessels touched the exclusion borders (bold continuous lines), are omitted. B: Mean diameter of the vessel is estimated by measuring the short axis of the vessel (short double arrow). (Hedenhain’s azan stain
Figure 4a: An unbiased counting frame laid on the image of the sections to estimate the numerical density (NV) of the fibroblasts. The nucleuses are unclear at the first 5 µm optical section (height of disector). b: As above, any nucleus lied in the counting frame or touched the inclusion borders (green dotted lines) and did not touch the exclusion borders (continuous green lines) and come into maximal focus within the next traveling 5 µm optical section (height of disector) are counted (the two green arrows). (Hedenhain’s azan stain ×2000).
Figure 5Effect of Simvastatin on wound closure rate in laboratory rats; untreated wounded (UW), gel base treated and SS-treated wounds in rats. Each point represents the mean (±SE) of twelve wounds. “a”: P<0.05, SS-treated group vs. UW and gel base treated groups
Mean (SD) of the numerical density of the fibroblasts (×104 per mm3), volume densities of the collagen bundles (Vv collagen/dermis; %) and vessels (Vv vessel/dermis; %), length density (mm/mm3) and mean diameter (µm) of vessels in the dermis of the wounded rats treated with simvastatin gel (SS) , gel base (Base) and untreated wounded group (UW).
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 2.20(0.44) | 20.21(8.10) | 3.25% (2.75%) | 54 %( 4 %) | 17.33(8.28) |
|
| 3.45(1.23)* | 16.57(3.89) | 4.09% (1.75%) | 71% (6%)* | 35.23(6.90)* |
|
| 1.22(0.28) | 17.16(7.25) | 2.40% (2.79%) | 49% (5%) | 18.02(6.65) |
|
* p < 0.05, SS group vs. UW group and Base group