James L Leenstra1, Robert C Miller2, Rui Qin1, James A Martenson1, Kenneth J Dornfeld1, James D Bearden1, Dev R Puri1, Philip J Stella1, Miroslaw A Mazurczak1, Marie D Klish1, Paul J Novotny1, Robert L Foote1, Charles L Loprinzi1. 1. James L. Leenstra, St Vincent Regional Cancer Center, Green Bay, WI; Robert C. Miller, Rui Qin, James A. Martenson, Paul J. Novotny, Robert L. Foote, and Charles L. Loprinzi, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Kenneth J. Dornfeld, Essentia Health Cancer Center, Duluth, MN; James D. Bearden, Palmetto Hematology Oncology, Spartanburg, SC; Dev R. Puri, Mercy Cancer Center, Des Moines, IA; Philip J. Stella, St Joseph Mercy Cancer Care Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Miroslaw A. Mazurczak, Sandford Health Cancer Center, Sioux Falls, SD; and Marie D. Klish, Hope Cancer Center, Longmont, CO. 2. James L. Leenstra, St Vincent Regional Cancer Center, Green Bay, WI; Robert C. Miller, Rui Qin, James A. Martenson, Paul J. Novotny, Robert L. Foote, and Charles L. Loprinzi, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Kenneth J. Dornfeld, Essentia Health Cancer Center, Duluth, MN; James D. Bearden, Palmetto Hematology Oncology, Spartanburg, SC; Dev R. Puri, Mercy Cancer Center, Des Moines, IA; Philip J. Stella, St Joseph Mercy Cancer Care Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Miroslaw A. Mazurczak, Sandford Health Cancer Center, Sioux Falls, SD; and Marie D. Klish, Hope Cancer Center, Longmont, CO. miller.robert@mayo.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Painful oral mucositis (OM) is a significant toxicity during radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to test the efficacy of doxepin hydrochloride in the reduction of radiotherapy-induced OM pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 155 patients were randomly allocated to a doxepin oral rinse or a placebo for the treatment of radiotherapy-related OM pain. Patients received a single dose of doxepin or placebo on day 1 and then crossed over to receive the opposite agent on a subsequent day. Pain questionnaires were administered at baseline and at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes. Patients were then given the option to continue doxepin. The primary end point was pain reduction as measured by the area under the curve (AUC) of the pain scale using data from day 1. RESULTS: Primary end point analysis revealed that the AUC for mouth and throat pain reduction was greater for doxepin (-9.1) than for placebo (-4.7; P < .001). Crossover analysis of patients completing both phases confirmed that patients experienced greater mouth and throat pain reduction with doxepin (intrapatient changes of 4.1 for doxepin-placebo arm and -2.8 for placebo-doxepin arm; P < .001). Doxepin was associated with more stinging or burning, unpleasant taste, and greater drowsiness than the placebo rinse. More patients receiving doxepin expressed a desire to continue treatment than did patients with placebo after completion of each of the randomized phases of the study. CONCLUSION: A doxepin rinse diminishes OM pain. Further studies are warranted to determine its role in the management of OM.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Painful oral mucositis (OM) is a significant toxicity during radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to test the efficacy of doxepin hydrochloride in the reduction of radiotherapy-induced OM pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 155 patients were randomly allocated to a doxepin oral rinse or a placebo for the treatment of radiotherapy-related OM pain. Patients received a single dose of doxepin or placebo on day 1 and then crossed over to receive the opposite agent on a subsequent day. Pain questionnaires were administered at baseline and at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes. Patients were then given the option to continue doxepin. The primary end point was pain reduction as measured by the area under the curve (AUC) of the pain scale using data from day 1. RESULTS: Primary end point analysis revealed that the AUC for mouth and throat pain reduction was greater for doxepin (-9.1) than for placebo (-4.7; P < .001). Crossover analysis of patients completing both phases confirmed that patients experienced greater mouth and throat pain reduction with doxepin (intrapatient changes of 4.1 for doxepin-placebo arm and -2.8 for placebo-doxepin arm; P < .001). Doxepin was associated with more stinging or burning, unpleasant taste, and greater drowsiness than the placebo rinse. More patients receiving doxepin expressed a desire to continue treatment than did patients with placebo after completion of each of the randomized phases of the study. CONCLUSION: A doxepin rinse diminishes OM pain. Further studies are warranted to determine its role in the management of OM.
Authors: Helen V Worthington; Jan E Clarkson; Gemma Bryan; Susan Furness; Anne-Marie Glenny; Anne Littlewood; Martin G McCabe; Stefan Meyer; Tasneem Khalid Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-04-13
Authors: P J Stiff; H Erder; W I Bensinger; C Emmanouilides; T Gentile; J Isitt; Z J Lu; R Spielberger Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Jan E Clarkson; Helen V Worthington; Susan Furness; Martin McCabe; Tasneem Khalid; Stefan Meyer Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2010-08-04
Authors: M J Dodd; S L Dibble; C Miaskowski; L MacPhail; D Greenspan; S M Paul; G Shiba; P Larson Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2000-07
Authors: Andy Trotti; Lisa A Bellm; Joel B Epstein; Diana Frame; Henry J Fuchs; Clement K Gwede; Eugene Komaroff; Luba Nalysnyk; Marya D Zilberberg Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Alexandra Shillingburg; Abraham S Kanate; Mehdi Hamadani; Sijin Wen; Michael Craig; Aaron Cumpston Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-11 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kranti A Mapuskar; Carryn M Anderson; Douglas R Spitz; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Bryan G Allen; Rebecca E Oberley-Deegan Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: Carryn M Anderson; Stephen T Sonis; Christopher M Lee; Douglas Adkins; Bryan G Allen; Wenqing Sun; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Madhavi L Venigalla; Yuhchyau Chen; Weining Zhen; Diane R Mould; Jon T Holmlund; Jeffrey M Brill; John M Buatti Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Bernardo Leon Rapoport; Ronwyn van Eeden; Vincent Sibaud; Joel B Epstein; Jean Klastersky; Matti Aapro; Devan Moodley Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Heidi Mason; Mary Beth DeRubeis; Nancy Burke; Melissa Shannon; Danielle Karsies; Gregory Wolf; Avi Eisbruch; Francis Worden Journal: World J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-04-10
Authors: Deborah P Saunders; Tanya Rouleau; Karis Cheng; Noam Yarom; Abhishek Kandwal; Jamie Joy; Kivanc Bektas Kayhan; Marianne van de Wetering; Norman Brito-Dellan; Tomoko Kataoka; Karen Chiang; Vinisha Ranna; Anusha Vaddi; Joel Epstein; Rajesh V Lalla; Paolo Bossi; Sharon Elad Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ysabella Z A Van Sebille; Romany Stansborough; Hannah R Wardill; Emma Bateman; Rachel J Gibson; Dorothy M Keefe Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 5.075