INTRODUCTION: Psychological morbidity in those diagnosed with cancer has been shown to result in poorer quality of life and increase the risk of mortality. As a result, researchers have designed and tested psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and survival of patients diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to describe the psychosocial interventions that have been tested in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Databases such as MEDLINE, PsychINFO, PubMed, MedLine, and Cochrane Reviews were searched. The searches were inclusive of studies published in English between 1966 and October 2013. Raters conducted full-text review of the resulting articles for the following eligibility criteria: (1) participants were 18 years or older, (2) the majority of patients in the sample were diagnosed with a gastrointestinal cancer, (3) the trial was testing a psychosocial intervention, and (4) random assignment to one or more interventions versus a usual care, placebo, attention control, or waiting-list control condition. RESULTS: The interventions that were eligible for this review included psychosocial or behavioral intervention (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, problem solving, educational, and collaborative care), physical activity, and/or psychopharmacologic treatment (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor). Interventions that included dietary changes were not included in the present review. Study quality was also assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) system. The results of the review resulted in a finding of eight studies to have been conducted, testing psychosocial interventions, in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Findings of these studies suggested that the interventions were effective in reducing psychological and physical symptoms associated with the cancer, improved quality of life, and reduced immune system dysregulation, and one study demonstrated an improvement in survival. Two studies reported no benefit from psychosocial intervention when compared with a control group. The quality of the studies varied greatly, but reporting of the details of the trials, and the methodological rigor, improved over time. CONCLUSION: Further research is warranted to design and test interventions that may be effective in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancers.
INTRODUCTION: Psychological morbidity in those diagnosed with cancer has been shown to result in poorer quality of life and increase the risk of mortality. As a result, researchers have designed and tested psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and survival of patients diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to describe the psychosocial interventions that have been tested in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Databases such as MEDLINE, PsychINFO, PubMed, MedLine, and Cochrane Reviews were searched. The searches were inclusive of studies published in English between 1966 and October 2013. Raters conducted full-text review of the resulting articles for the following eligibility criteria: (1) participants were 18 years or older, (2) the majority of patients in the sample were diagnosed with a gastrointestinal cancer, (3) the trial was testing a psychosocial intervention, and (4) random assignment to one or more interventions versus a usual care, placebo, attention control, or waiting-list control condition. RESULTS: The interventions that were eligible for this review included psychosocial or behavioral intervention (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, problem solving, educational, and collaborative care), physical activity, and/or psychopharmacologic treatment (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor). Interventions that included dietary changes were not included in the present review. Study quality was also assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) system. The results of the review resulted in a finding of eight studies to have been conducted, testing psychosocial interventions, in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Findings of these studies suggested that the interventions were effective in reducing psychological and physical symptoms associated with the cancer, improved quality of life, and reduced immune system dysregulation, and one study demonstrated an improvement in survival. Two studies reported no benefit from psychosocial intervention when compared with a control group. The quality of the studies varied greatly, but reporting of the details of the trials, and the methodological rigor, improved over time. CONCLUSION: Further research is warranted to design and test interventions that may be effective in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancers.
Authors: D Cunningham; S Pyrhönen; R D James; C J Punt; T F Hickish; R Heikkila; T B Johannesen; H Starkhammar; C A Topham; L Awad; C Jacques; P Herait Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-10-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Paul McCrone; Martin Knapp; Judith Proudfoot; Clash Ryden; Kate Cavanagh; David A Shapiro; Sophie Ilson; Jeffrey A Gray; David Goldberg; Anthony Mann; Isaac Marks; Brian Everitt; Andre Tylee Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Eva K Horn; Tjeerd B van Benthem; Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen; Harm W J van Marwijk; Aartjan T F Beekman; Frans F Rutten; Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2007-02-26 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Ellen Westhoff; J Alfred Witjes; Neil E Fleshner; Seth P Lerner; Shahrokh F Shariat; Gunnar Steineck; Ellen Kampman; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Alina Vrieling Journal: Bladder Cancer Date: 2018-01-20