Literature DB >> 24733368

Splenic injury complicating ERCP.

Anastasios Grammatopoulos1, Maria Moschou1, Efrossyni Rigopoulou2, George Katsoras1.   

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive procedure which carries a complication rate of 5-10%. Splenic injury is a very rare and potentially lethal complication following ERCP. We report a case of a 64-year-old man with a mass at the pancreatic head and obstructive jaundice, who sustained a splenic injury following ERCP. Six hours after the procedure, the patient presented with epigastric pain and hypotension. The abdominal CT scan revealed splenic hematoma. He was offered surgical treatment. Splenectomy was performed with enterogastrostomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERCP; Splenic injury; splenectomy

Year:  2014        PMID: 24733368      PMCID: PMC3982638     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1108-7471


Introduction

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive procedure used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The procedure itself carries a complication rate of 5-10% [1-3]. The most common complications are acute pancreatitis, perforation and hemorrhage. Splenic injury is a very rare and potentially lethal complication following ERCP. The first splenic injury post ERCP was reported in 1988 by Trondsen [4]; a total of eleven cases have been documented in the literature since then [5].

Case report

We report a case of a 64-year-old man who sustained a splenic injury following ERCP. He was admitted to hospital with obstructive jaundice, and he reported a past medical history of coronary heart disease, right lower pulmonary lobectomy due to lung cancer 5 years previously and nephrotic syndrome. The basic laboratory tests were normal except for liver function tests, which showed a bilirubin level of 12.6 mg/dL (reference level, 0.3-1.2 mg/L), an alkaline phosphatase level of 419 U/L (reference level, 40-129 U/L), and an amylase level of 708 U/L (reference level, 28-128 U/L). His clotting profile was normal. The abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed a mass at the head of the pancreas with dilated pancreatic and common bile duct and additionally some paraortic and mesenteric lymph nodes. The CT was performed without intravenous contrast medium due to renal insufficiency. An upper GI endoscopy revealed duodenal stenosis (treated with balloon dilatation) and a deformed ampulla of Vater secondary to the tumor. An ERCP followed which confirmed the above findings and a plastic stent was placed in the common bile duct and draining was achieved. Six hours after the procedure the patient complained of epigastric pain. He was afebrile with a pulse rate of 85 beats/ min and a systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 100 and 70 mm Hg respectively. The physical examination revealed a soft abdomen with mild tenderness over the epigastrium and left upper quadrant without peritoneal signs. The next day (18 h after the procedure) a second CT was performed which showed a homogeneous mass lesion of the left subdiaphragmatic region in keeping with a splenic hematoma (Fig. 1). A hemoperitneum and a plastic biliary stent were also present. Laboratory blood tests including complete blood count showed a decrease of the hemoglobin (from 14.1 to 8.0 g/dL) and mild leukocytosis: 11.3 k/mL. Subsequently, an emergency surgical solution was offered to the patient. After entering the peritoneal cavity the following findings were observed: a) rupture at the hilum of the spleen; and b) a solid mass in the head of the pancreas obstructing the duodenum. Splenectomy was performed (Fig. 2) with meticulous hemostasis and enterogastrostomy (stomach - jejunum) in order to bypass the obstructed duodenum.
Figure 1

Computed tomography of splenic hematoma

Figure 2

Resected spleen with hematoma

Computed tomography of splenic hematoma Resected spleen with hematoma

Discussion

As ERCP has become more widely used, rare complications of the procedure have been reported more often in recent years. Cases of splenic injury after colonoscopy are well described in the literature but splenic injury after ERCP remains rare. Post-ERCP splenic injuries have variable pathological findings. They include avulsion of the short gastric vessel(s), avulsion of the splenic capsule, subcapsular hematomas and splenic lacerations. The exact mechanism causing splenic injuries during ERCP remains unresolved. ‘Bowing’ of the endoscope in the ‘long’ position with torsion on the greater curvature of the stomach (while attempting to pass the endoscope through the narrowed duodenum or to cannulate the papilla) is the causative mechanism postulated by most authors [1,6,9,11]. Patients with cirrhosis, pancreatitis, and those who are on anticoagulants are expected to be more prone to splenic injury during ERCP. Pancreatitis, especially chronic pancreatitis, may lead to calcification and fibrosis of the supporting ligaments between the pancreas and the spleen, resulting in reduced relative mobility between the stomach and spleen [5,14]. Another factor contributing to splenic injury during ERCP is the presence of abdominal adhesions due to prior abdominal surgery. In our case two steps of the procedure were particularly challenging. Firstly, in order to bypass the duodenal stenosis a balloon dilatation was necessary. Secondly, in order to achieve cannulation of the bile duct prolonged manipulations of the side-view endoscope within the edematous and deformed duodenum had to be performed. These difficulties led to a prolonged procedure. It is our speculation that pressure on the spleen capsule/ligament from the bowing endoscope within the stomach’s greater curvature led to the splenic injury. Additionally, although the patient had intraperitoneal bleeding he had no high pulse rate. That was attributed to previous β-blocker treatment. In conclusion, we report the case of a splenic injury post ERCP. Gastroenterologists and surgeons should be aware of this potential complication and have increasedsuspicion in patients with diffuse abdominal pain and drop of hemoglobin post ERCP. The interval of appearance of the symptoms following splenic injury may vary between a few hours to a few days [6-15].
  15 in total

1.  Injury to the liver and spleen after diagnostic ERCP.

Authors:  Rachid Badaoui; Martial Ouendo; Richard Delcenserie; Chafik El Kettani; Mickael Radji; Michel Ossart
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2002 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Splenic injury complicating therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and ERCP.

Authors:  F W Lewis; N Moloo; G V Stiegmann; J S Goff
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comprehensive clinical review.

Authors:  Matthew L Silviera; Mark J Seamon; Brian Porshinsky; Mark P Prosciak; Vijay A Doraiswamy; Cecilia F Wang; Manuel Lorenzo; Michael Truitt; John Biboa; Amy M Jarvis; Vimal K Narula; Steven M Steinberg; S Peter Stawicki
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.008

4.  Splenic parenchymal complications in pancreatitis.

Authors:  Pradeep V Patil; Ahmed Khalil; Mohamed A Thaha
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2011-05-06

5.  Injury to the liver and spleen after diagnostic ERCP.

Authors:  W C Wu; R M Katon
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Splenic injury and abscess complicating endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  G Furman; L Morgenstern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Splenic trauma following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  A Y Lo; M Washington; M G Fischer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: spectrum of abnormalities demonstrated with CT.

Authors:  H K Pannu; E K Fishman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  Splenic injury as a complication of endoscopy: two case reports and a literature review.

Authors:  E Ong; U Böhmler; D Wurbs
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Rare complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: two case reports.

Authors:  D D Kingsley; C R Schermer; M M Jamal
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  4 in total

1.  Splenic abscess complicating endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Travis Haneke; Andrew J Widmer; Austin Metting
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2018-04-25

Review 2.  Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: expected post-procedural findings and adverse events.

Authors:  Tarek N Hanna; Saurabh Rohatgi; Haris N Shekhani; Fatima Shahid; Vijayanadh Ojili; Faisal Khosa
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-07-26

Review 3.  Splenic Injury Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Richard Lee; Alexander Huelsen; Nivene Saad; Peter Hodgkinson; Luke F Hourigan
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-28

4.  Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Induced Splenic Injury in a Patient With Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Laith Al Momani; Shoura Karar; Lindsey C Shipley; Allison Locke; James Swenson
Journal:  J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.