Literature DB >> 24733017

Pathophysiology of lung injury induced by common bile duct ligation in mice.

Fumiaki Shikata1, Tomohisa Sakaue2, Koh-ichi Nakashiro3, Mikio Okazaki1, Mie Kurata4, Toru Okamura1, Masahiro Okura1, Masahiro Ryugo1, Yuki Nakamura1, Takumi Yasugi1, Shigeki Higashiyama2, Hironori Izutani1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liver dysfunction and cirrhosis affect vasculature in several organ systems and cause impairment of organ functions, thereby increasing morbidity and mortality. Establishment of a mouse model of hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) would provide greater insights into the genetic basis of the disease. Our objectives were to establish a mouse model of lung injury after common bile duct ligation (CBDL) and to investigate pulmonary pathogenesis for application in future therapeutic approaches.
METHODS: Eight-week-old Balb/c mice were subjected to CBDL. Immunohistochemical analyses and real-time quantitative reverse transcriptional polymerase chain reaction were performed on pulmonary tissues. The presence of HPS markers was detected by western blot and microarray analyses.
RESULTS: We observed extensive proliferation of CD31-positive pulmonary vascular endothelial cells at 2 weeks after CBDL and identified 10 upregulated and 9 down-regulated proteins that were associated with angiogenesis. TNF-α and MMP-9 were highly expressed at 3 weeks after CBDL and were less expressed in the lungs of the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: We constructed a mouse lung injury model by using CBDL. Contrary to our expectation, lung pathology in our mouse model exhibited differences from that of rat models, and the mechanisms responsible for these differences are unknown. This phenomenon may be explained by contrasting processes related to TNF induction of angiogenic signaling pathways in the inflammatory phase. Thus, we suggest that our mouse model can be applied to pulmonary pathological analyses in the inflammatory phase, i.e., to systemic inflammatory response syndrome, acute lung injury, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24733017      PMCID: PMC3986091          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Liver dysfunction and cirrhosis affect vasculature in several organ systems, resulting in impairment of organ function that leads to increased morbidity and mortality.[1], [2] Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a pulmonary vascular disorder associated with liver cirrhosis and is seen in 5–32% of cirrhotic patients in the setting of pulmonary microvascular dilatation-induced defects in arterial oxygenation.[1], [2] Although HPS occurs more frequently in patients with severe liver disease, patients with severe hepatic dysfunction do not always have HPS. This syndrome can also be seen in children with biliary atresia, and the same disease pattern is seen in the non-cirrhosis setting in congenital heart disease patients with a post-operative status of bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt that excludes hepatic venous return through the pulmonary vasculature.[3]–[5] Experimental rat models of HPS have enabled researchers to investigate the pathogenesis of this disease. Fallon et al. demonstrated that endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in the lungs play an important role in HPS pathogenesis.[5]–[9] Fallon et al. also reported that angiogenesis plays a role in the pathophysiology of HPS and explained the mechanisms underlying the activation of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), which is produced by inflammatory cells such as intravascular monocytes and induces angiogenesis.[10] Establishment of a mouse model of HPS would help obtain greater insights into the genetic basis of the disease. Although some results have been reported for murine models of hepatic disease, mortality rates in mice are higher than those in rats, and limited data are available on lung pathology after common bile duct ligation (CBDL) in mice.[11]–[14] Our objectives were to establish a mouse model of lung injury by using CBDL and investigate its pulmonary pathogenesis for application in future therapeutic approaches.

Materials and Methods

Animal model

All animals were treated in accordance with standards of the Ehime University Animal Care Committee using approved animal protocols including animal ethics (Permit Number: 05R02-2). The Ehime University Animal Care Committee approved our animal protocols including animal ethics. All animals were treated in accordance with standards of the committee using the approved animal protocols. Eight-week-old Balb/c mice (n = 112) were obtained from Clea Japan Inc. (Tokyo) and were housed under barrier conditions. A standard sterilized laboratory diet and water were available ad libitum. All surgical procedures were performed utilizing clean techniques. All animals were anesthetized with ketamine (0.1 mg/g) and xylazine (0.01 mg/g) administered by intraperitoneal injection. After induction of anesthesia, a median abdominal incision was made and the common bile duct was identified. The duct was dissected carefully under a microscope and doubly ligated with 7–0 Prolene (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) and transected. In the sham operation (control) group, the duct was dissected without CBDL. The abdominal incision was closed in two layers. After abdominal closure, 1.0 ml of 0.9% saline was injected subcutaneously into each mouse, and the mice were kept warm until recovery was confirmed. We continued to inject 1.0 ml of 0.9% saline subcutaneously every 2 d for 6 d; this procedure led to improved survival rates after surgery. Mice were sacrificed between 1 and 4 weeks after surgery. Mice were anesthetized with ketamine (0.1 mg/g) and xylazine (0.01 mg/g). After we confirmed that mice were well sedated, they were given 50 µl of heparin (50 mg/ml) subcutaneously.[15] The trachea was surgically exposed and cannulated with a 20G Terumo Surflo Catheter (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Right cardiac ventricles were perfused with cold PBS (10 ml) under physiological pressure with an exit through the severed right atrium. The lungs were inflated and fixed at 23 cm pressure with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The lungs, liver, heart, and spleen were carefully harvested with dissection of excess surrounding tissues. A method for intrapulmonary shunt-fraction analysis in mice was established by Miniati et al.[15] Briefly, fluorescent microspheres (1.25×105; diameter, 10 µm) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in PBS were injected into the inferior vena cava and all blood was aspirated from the transected right carotid artery. Aspirated microspheres were then counted manually under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence

In brief, deparaffinization and standard antigen retrieval by microwave irradiation were performed on 8-µm sections of 4% paraformaldehyde paraffin-fixed tissues. The sections were then blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin and incubated with primary antibodies against CD31 (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), von Willebrand factor (vWF; Chemicon International, Temecula, CA), eNOS, iNOS (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), Ly6G, CD68, F4/80, MMP-8, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-4 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). Next, secondary antibodies were applied and the samples were incubated. Sections were developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and counter-stained with hematoxylin. Sections were immunostained using antibodies to vWF (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), and Alexa Fluor anti-mouse IgG for secondary fluorescent antibodies (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). For nuclear staining, mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was used. Pictures were taken using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Microvascular density and quantitation were assessed as previously described by Zhang et al.[10], [16] This analysis was performed in a blinded manner. Dissected lung sections that were immunostained for CD31 and vWF were used (n = 5), and pulmonary vessels with a diameter of >100 µm were excluded from the analysis. Positive-stained cells were counted at five representative locations under high magnification (40×) using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) and results were averaged.

Assembly of CD31-positive cells/magnetic beads complex

Homogenized whole lungs were treated using a solution of type-1 collagenase (400 U/ml) (Worthington, Lakewood, NJ). CD31-positive cells, including pulmonary vascular endothelial cells, were collected with magnetic beads (Dynabeads; Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) coated with anti-CD31 antibodies (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) as follows.[17] The cellular digest was filtered through a sterile 40-µm mesh and washed three times in 10% FBS-DMEM (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). One milliliter of the cell suspension was placed in a tube with the magnetic beads/CD31-antibody complex and rotated for 20 min at 4°C. The bead-bound cells were then washed five times with 10% FBS-DMEM and the isolated cells were used in the following procedures.

Real-time quantitative reverse transcriptional polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

Whole pulmonary cells and CD31-positive cells were selected as described above. Total RNA was extracted from each cell in the CBDL and sham mouse groups using Isogen II (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan). The RNA samples were then treated with an RNase-free DNase (Ambion, Carlsbad, CA) to remove genomic DNA contaminants. Messenger RNA was quantified using SYBR Green PCR master mix (Roche, Branford, CT) with an ABI Prism 7300 Fast Real-Time PCR system. The mRNA expression levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), endothelin type A receptor (ET-A), endothelin type B receptor (ET-B), kinase insert domain receptor (KDR), CC chemokine receptor type 1 (CCR1), chemokine CXC motif ligand 3 (CXCL3), CXC chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2), chemokine CC motif ligand 9 (CCL9), matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1b), and TNF-α were normalized to the levels of of β-actin. The primer sequences used for the amplification are shown in Table 1. The experiments were performed in triplicate and independently repeated a minimum of three times.
Table 1

Primer sequences for quantitative RT-PCR.

Target genePrimer sequence 5'-3'
ET-1forward GTCAACACTCCCGACCACGTT
reverse CTGGTTTGTCTTAGGTGTTCCTC
eNOSforward CTGTGGTCTGGTGCTGGTC
reverse TGGGCAACTTGAAGAGTGTG
ET-Aforward ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC
reverse TCAACATCTCACAAGTCATGAG
ET-Bforward TTGGAGCTGAGATGTGTAAGC
reverse CAGTGAAGCCATGTTGATACC
KDRforward GGGATGG TCCTTGCATCAGAA
reverse ACTGGTAGCCACTGGTCTGGTTG
CCR1forward TTAGCTTCCATGCCTGCCTTATA
reverse TCCACTGCTTCAGGCTCTTGT
CXCL3forward GGAGCACCAACTGACAGGAGAGAA
reverse ACCACCCTGCAGGAAGTGTCAA
CXCR2forward GCTCTGACTACCACCCAACCTTGA
reverse AGAAGAGCAGCTGTGACCTGCTGT
CCL9forward CCAGTGGTGGGTGTACCAG
reverse CTCCGATCACTGGGGTTG
MMP9forward CGAACTTCGACACTGACAAGAAGT
reverse GCACGCTGGAATGATCTAAGC
IL-1bforward CAACCAACAAGTGATATTCTCCATG
reverse GATCCACACTCTCCAGCTGCA
TNF-αforward CTGTAGCCCACGTCGTAGC
reverse TTGAGATCCATGCCGTTG
β-actinforward CGGTTCCGATGCCCTGAGGCTCTT
reverse CGTCACACTTCATGATGGAATTGA

Western blot analysis

CD31-positive cells were isolated as described above and lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl containing 0.15 m NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% sodium cholate, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mm EDTA, and 0.5 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 7.4). Proteins from lung tissues were also extracted with RIPA buffer. Equal concentrations of protein from pulmonary CD31-positive cells and whole lungs were fractionated on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to Immun-Blot PVDF Membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Samples were incubated with primary antibodies against MMP-9, F4/80, CD31, eNOS, induced nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and β-actin (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA). The proteins were detected using an ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection System (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) and imaged on an LAS-4000 luminescent image analyzer (Fujifilm Life Science USA, Stamford, CT).

Microarray analysis

CD31-positive cells were assembled from three mice in each group. Total RNA was extracted from pulmonary CD31-positive cells and whole pulmonary cells with Isogen II and collected as one sample in each group. We used 500 ng of total RNA to generate double-stranded cDNA. The cDNA was transcribed with DIG-labeled nucleotides (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), fragmented, and hybridized to a Gene Chip Mouse Gene 1.0 ST Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. These results were analyzed using the Gene Spring GX 12.1 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA; Ingenuity Systems, Redwood, CA) software. Functional analysis by IPA identified the biological functions that were most significant to the data set. Fischer's exact test was used to calculate a p-value indicating the probability that each biological function assigned to that data set was due to chance alone. The microarray data are deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.-gov/geo, Accession number: GSE50088) according to Minimum Information About Microarray Experiment (MIAME) guidelines.

Protein array analysis of serum

Serum from CBDL and sham operated mice was prepared and subjected to mouse angiogenesis array (R&D Systems ARY015, Minneapolis, MN) analysis according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Flow cytometry

Two weeks and 3 weeks after CBDL, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was collected from CBDL and sham operated mice to analyze the neutrophil and macrophage populations. To obtain BAL fluid, the trachea was cannulated with a 20 G angiocatheter and the lungs were lavaged five times with 1 ml of 1%FCS in PBS. The fluid was collected into one FACS tube and centrifuged at 500×g for 5 min at 4°C. The cell pellet was washed in FACS buffer, stained with CD11b, Ly6G, and F4/80 antibodies (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), and incubated on ice for 30 minutes. After cells were washed in FACS buffer, they were resuspended in 500 µl of FACS buffer and analyzed with FACS Calibur flowcytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA).

Statistical analysis

All measurement values in this study are expressed as means ± SE. All statistical analyses were performed with JMP 8.0 and analyzed using, where appropriate, either paired t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test. All tests were two sided. Results with p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The frequency of mortality was 82.2%, 59.2%, and 34.2% at 1, 2, and 3 weeks, respectively, after CBDL (Fig. 1A). No mortality was observed in the sham group. Significant weight loss occurred beginning at 2 weeks after surgery (Table 2), and appetite loss and low activity were observed prior to death. No bile leakage was observed at autopsy in the abdominal cavity of mice that died before sacrifice. To confirm the level of liver damage resulting from CBDL surgery, serum levels of liver-function markers were measured (n = 5); all of these markers were significantly elevated from 1 week after CBDL (Table 2). The development of ascites, a parameter of liver dysfunction,[14] was observed from 1 week after surgery. To assess lung injury after surgery, arterial blood was drained from the right carotid artery for blood gas analysis. Significantly lower PaO2 was found in the CBDL group at 2 and 3 weeks after surgery (70.0%±2.87% and 68.4%±1.3% respectively) compared with the sham group (87.8%±1.6%) (n = 6). To confirm and compare our results with a well-established experimental hepatopulmonary syndrome model (a rat cirrhotic model of pulmonary microcirculation),[10] we applied the intrapulmonary shunt fraction calculation to our model. The resulting value for the sham group was 2.6%±1.3%. For the CBDL group, the resulting values were 4.1%±0.9% at 2 weeks after CBDL; and 4.9%±2.0% at 3 weeks after CBDL. Differences between sham and CBDL mice were not significant (P = 0.4 at 2 weeks, P = 0.3 at 3 weeks, n = 7). Histologic changes in hematoxylin-eosin staining and pulmonary vascular proliferation in immunohistochemical analysis of the lungs are shown in Figures 1B and 2A. These changes were consistent with findings of a murine CBDL model in which pulmonary angiogenic processes were confirmed by immunostaining imagery.[12]
Figure 1

Survival curves and histological changes in common bile duct ligated (CBDL) mice and sham operated mice.

(A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve in common bile duct ligated (CBDL) mice (n = 44) and sham operated (control) mice (n = 41). (B) HE-stained lung sections of sham and CBDL mice: (a) sham; (b) 1 week after CBDL; (c) 2 weeks after CBDL; (d) 3 weeks after CBDL (×20). Scale bar  = 100 µm.

Table 2

Laboratory data after common bile duct ligation in mice.

shamCBDL, week
123
AST, IU/l64±5.0528±72*651±99*647±106*
ALT, IU/l30±2.0520±46*492±31*618±107*
T. Bil, mg/dl0.6±0.112±1.3*18±2.6*19±2.6*
ALP315±351485±243*2764±281*2709±386*
Liver weight, g/10 g BW0.05±0.010.06±0.010.09±0.01*0.09±0.01*

Values given are means ± SE.

CBDL, common bile duct ligation; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; T. Bil, total bilirubin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; BW, body weight. *p<0.05 vs. sham.

Figure 2

Immunohistochemical analysis of lung tissues in common bile duct ligated (CBDL) and sham-operated (control) mice.

(A) Immunohistochemistry of von Willebrand factor (vWF)-stained lung section of sham and CBDL mice: (a) sham; (b) 3 weeks after CBDL. Scale bar  = 100 µm. (B) Graphical summary of lung microvessel counts by immunohistochemical analysis using CD31 and vWF antibodies in mice at 1–3 weeks after CBDL and in sham operated mice. *P<0.05 (CBDL vs. sham).

Survival curves and histological changes in common bile duct ligated (CBDL) mice and sham operated mice.

(A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve in common bile duct ligated (CBDL) mice (n = 44) and sham operated (control) mice (n = 41). (B) HE-stained lung sections of sham and CBDL mice: (a) sham; (b) 1 week after CBDL; (c) 2 weeks after CBDL; (d) 3 weeks after CBDL (×20). Scale bar  = 100 µm.

Immunohistochemical analysis of lung tissues in common bile duct ligated (CBDL) and sham-operated (control) mice.

(A) Immunohistochemistry of von Willebrand factor (vWF)-stained lung section of sham and CBDL mice: (a) sham; (b) 3 weeks after CBDL. Scale bar  = 100 µm. (B) Graphical summary of lung microvessel counts by immunohistochemical analysis using CD31 and vWF antibodies in mice at 1–3 weeks after CBDL and in sham operated mice. *P<0.05 (CBDL vs. sham). Values given are means ± SE. CBDL, common bile duct ligation; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; T. Bil, total bilirubin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; BW, body weight. *p<0.05 vs. sham. To investigate angiogenesis in the lung after CBDL by using methods consistent with an established rat model, we performed lung microvessel counts in which we quantified increases in microvessels at 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL in comparison with the sham group (Fig. 2A and B).[10] A significant increase in average lung microvessel count was revealed by both CD31 and vWF staining 2 weeks after CBDL, relative to the results for the sham group. Immunostaining of lungs using eNOS and iNOS antibodies, which were reported to be highly expressed after CBDL in a rat model,[6] revealed no significant differences in eNOS and iNOS expression between the CBDL and sham groups (data not shown). Elevated ET-1, ET-A, ET-B, KDR, and eNOS mRNA expression levels have also been reported after CBDL in rats.[6]–[9], [18] However, our qRT-PCR analyses revealed no significant differences in mRNA expression between the CBDL and sham groups (data not shown). We thus hypothesized that lung pathogenesis in this mouse CBDL model could be different from that in the other models, and we proceeded to apply global analysis of the gene expression profile associated with this lung pathogenesis using a microarray technique.

Identification of genes in mouse CD31-positive pulmonary cells by microarray analysis

Based on our finding that proliferation of CD31-positive pulmonary vascular endothelial cells was more extensive after 2 weeks, we assumed that analysis of genes related to CD31-positive cells would be the key to investigating pulmonary pathogenesis after CBDL. CD31-positive pulmonary cells were selectively collected as described in the Methods, and the purity of the cell fractions was confirmed by qRT-PCR and western blot analyses. We determined the global gene expression profiles of CD31-positive pulmonary cells in mice 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL, compared to those of sham mice, and found 79 genes that were commonly up-regulated by more than 2-fold in mice that had undergone CBDL (Table 3). This information was used to visualize the network of gene expression patterns, and 34 genes were identified as being connected directly or indirectly to TNF-α, located at the center of the network (Fig. 3). To confirm the localization of TNF-α, immunofluorescence analysis was used (Fig 4). The results indicated that TNF-α was highly expressed in pulmonary vascular endothelial cells in the CBDL mice, when compared with the sham operated mice.
Table 3

Genes up- or down-regulated >2.0 fold in pulmonary cells of mice at 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL, assembled by a magnetic bead/CD31-antibody complex, in comparison with levels in sham operated mice, as determined by the Gene Chip Mouse Gene 1.0 ST Array.

Gene IDSymbolGene Name Fold change2w3w
17394MMP8matrix metallopeptidase 8 (neutrophil collagenase)18.59720.121
74145F13A1coagulation factor XIII, A1 polypeptide12.4297.512
20201S100A8S100 calcium binding protein A811.96013.878
21926TNFtumor necrosis factor7.4392.874
56619CLEC4EC-type lectin domain family 4, member E7.3183.959
12475CD14CD14 molecule7.2624.187
13003VCANversican7.0933.964
100034251Gm11428predicted gene 114287.0129.548
104183|12655Chi3l3/Chi3l4chitinase 3-like 36.9843.645
20288MSR1macrophage scavenger receptor 16.9294.557
14058F10coagulation factor X6.6383.471
12772CCR2chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 26.3894.536
20202S100A9S100 calcium binding protein A96.2837.824
58217TREM1triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 15.965.005
216799NLRP3NLR family, pyrin domain containing 35.683.363
20310CXCL3chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 35.5313.265
20716SERPINA3serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A (alpha-1 antiproteinase, antitrypsin), member 34.5575.632
12768CCR1chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 14.5014.698
12489Cd33CD33 antigen4.3684.975
23845CLEC5AC-type lectin domain family 5, member A4.1484.047
12765CXCR2chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 24.1255.535
100038947Sirpb1asignal-regulatory protein beta 1A3.9443.915
83382SIGLEC8sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 83.9213.208
12273C5AR1complement component 5a receptor 13.8932.917
16819LCN2lipocalin 23.8623.671
16948LOXlysyl oxidase3.8563.168
12986CSF3Rcolony stimulating factor 3 receptor (granulocyte)3.8544.490
16409ITGAMintegrin, alpha M (complement component 3 receptor 3 subunit)3.7913.748
17395MMP9matrix metallopeptidase 9 (gelatinase B, 92kDa gelatinase, 92 kDa type IV collagenase)3.5764.147
20308CCL9chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 93.5512.835
246256FCGR3AFc fragment of IgG, low affinity IIIa, receptor (CD16a)3.5113.572
74442SGMS2sphingomyelin synthase 23.4912.318
11690ALOX5AParachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein3.4663.410
170733Klra17killer cell lectin-like receptor, subfamily A, member 173.4663.997
20568SLPIsecretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor3.4332.644
18173SLC11A1solute carrier family 11 (proton-coupled divalent metal ion transporters), member 13.2122.344
56221CCL24chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 243.2112.598
27226PLA2G7phospholipase A2, group VII (platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase, plasma)3.213.009
18733LILRB3leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor, subfamily B (with TM and ITIM domains), member 33.1733.046
13058CYBBcytochrome b-245, beta polypeptide3.1472.017
16176IL1Binterleukin 1, beta3.1472.196
170743TLR7toll-like receptor 73.1362.434
278180VSIG4V-set and immunoglobulin domain containing 43.1319.911
12978CSF1Rcolony stimulating factor 1 receptor3.0762.409
19204PTAFRplatelet-activating factor receptor3.0492.502
21810TGFBItransforming growth factor, beta-induced, 68kDa3.0042.992
20556SLFN12Lschlafen family member 12-like3.0012.139
12182BST1bone marrow stromal cell antigen 12.9252.327
15368HMOX1heme oxygenase (decycling) 12.8442.563
14293FPR1formyl peptide receptor 12.7482.280
14191FGRGardner-Rasheed feline sarcoma viral (v-fgr) oncogene homolog2.6752.150
57248Ly6alymphocyte antigen 6 complex, locus A2.6733.938
20351SEMA4Asema domain, immunoglobulin domain, transmembrane domain and short cytoplasmic domain, 4A2.6542.315
74039NFAM1NFAT activating protein with ITAM motif 12.632.750
16854LGALS3lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 32.6272.037
14131FCGR2AFc fragment of IgG, low affinity IIa, receptor (CD32)2.5692.921
12267C3AR1complement component 3a receptor 12.5463.573
14127FCER1GFc fragment of IgE, high affinity I, receptor for; gamma polypeptide2.5292.279
80885HCAR2hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 22.5082.019
380924OLFM4olfactomedin 42.4972.717
11801CD5LCD5 molecule-like2.4925.669
12983CSF2RBcolony stimulating factor 2 receptor, beta, low-affinity (granulocyte-macrophage)2.4442.262
16658MAFBv-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog B (avian)2.4282.510
22177TYROBPTYRO protein tyrosine kinase binding protein2.3312.255
11501ADAM8ADAM metallopeptidase domain 82.3272.410
170744TLR8toll-like receptor 82.1772.221
378460PRAM1PML-RARA regulated adaptor molecule 12.1532.739
20375SPI1spleen focus forming virus (SFFV) proviral integration oncogene spi12.1422.175
14728Gp49a/Lilrb4leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor, subfamily B, member 42.0072.302
18507PAX5paired box 5−2.068−2.522
14128FCER2Fc fragment of IgE, low affinity II, receptor for (CD23)−2.08−3.552
12482MS4A1membrane-spanning 4-domains, subfamily A, member 1−2.130−2.302
12478CD19CD19 molecule−2.183−2.643
19695Reg3gregenerating islet-derived 3 gamma−2.365−2.158
15510HSPD1heat shock 60 kDa protein 1 (chaperonin)−2.529−2.360
12517CD72CD72 molecule−2.539−2.522
17888MYH6myosin, heavy chain 6, cardiac muscle, alpha−3.71−2.284
230899NPPAnatriuretic peptide A−5.536−5.525
15505HSPH1heat shock 105 kDa/110 kDa protein 1−5.641−3.651
Figure 3

Relevance network of gene signaling pathways identified by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis.

Arrow charts represent all expression values (fold changes). Color-coded gene symbols: red represents up-regulation, green represents down-regulation. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) plays a central role in pulmonary pathogenesis in common bile duct ligated mice.

Figure 4

Immunofluorescent localization of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α).

Representative images of lung tissues isolated 3 weeks after the CBDL or sham procedures showing vWF (red), TNF-α (green), and DAPI, nuclear staining marker (blue). (a–c) Staining at 3 weeks after the CBDL and (d–f) sham procedures. TNF-α was more highly expressed in pulmonary endothelial vascular cells at 3 weeks after CBDL than those of the sham operated group (original magnification, ×20).

Relevance network of gene signaling pathways identified by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis.

Arrow charts represent all expression values (fold changes). Color-coded gene symbols: red represents up-regulation, green represents down-regulation. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) plays a central role in pulmonary pathogenesis in common bile duct ligated mice.

Immunofluorescent localization of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α).

Representative images of lung tissues isolated 3 weeks after the CBDL or sham procedures showing vWF (red), TNF-α (green), and DAPI, nuclear staining marker (blue). (a–c) Staining at 3 weeks after the CBDL and (d–f) sham procedures. TNF-α was more highly expressed in pulmonary endothelial vascular cells at 3 weeks after CBDL than those of the sham operated group (original magnification, ×20).

qRT-PCR verification of microarray data

Seven genes associated with angiogenesis were selected for validation, and the directional fold change of each gene was confirmed using qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 5a-i). Significant differences in mRNA expression of each selected gene were observed when compared with the sham operated group. Peak elevation of mRNA expression in MMP9 was observed at 4 weeks after CBDL, while that in TNF-α was observed 2 weeks after CBDL (Fig. 5h, i).
Figure 5

Real-time PCR analysis of representative genes identified with microarray analysis (a–g) was performed in pulmonary cells assembled by magnetic beads/CD31-antibody complexes in mice 3 weeks after CBDL (CBDL) and in sham operated controls (sham).

(a) MMP9 and (b) TNF-α. (c) CCR1, (d) CXCL3, (e) CXCR2, (f) IL-1b, and (g) CCL9. (h) and (i) were performed in whole pulmonary cells of sham and 1–4 weeks after CBDL groups. (h) MMP9 and (i) TNF-α. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 3 in each group). Y-axis abbreviations: CCL9, chemokine CC motif ligand 9; MMP9, matrix metallopeptidase 9; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; CCR1, CC chemokine type-1 receptor; CXCL3, chemokine CXC motif ligand 3; CXCR2, CXC chemokine receptor; IL-1b, interleukin-1 beta. *P<0.05 (CBDL vs. sham).

Real-time PCR analysis of representative genes identified with microarray analysis (a–g) was performed in pulmonary cells assembled by magnetic beads/CD31-antibody complexes in mice 3 weeks after CBDL (CBDL) and in sham operated controls (sham).

(a) MMP9 and (b) TNF-α. (c) CCR1, (d) CXCL3, (e) CXCR2, (f) IL-1b, and (g) CCL9. (h) and (i) were performed in whole pulmonary cells of sham and 1–4 weeks after CBDL groups. (h) MMP9 and (i) TNF-α. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 3 in each group). Y-axis abbreviations: CCL9, chemokine CC motif ligand 9; MMP9, matrix metallopeptidase 9; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; CCR1, CC chemokine type-1 receptor; CXCL3, chemokine CXC motif ligand 3; CXCR2, CXC chemokine receptor; IL-1b, interleukin-1 beta. *P<0.05 (CBDL vs. sham).

Identification of angiogenic protein in serum by protein array analysis

To identify the proteins that were important to angiogenic processes, we analyzed mouse serum 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL in comparison to that of sham mice using protein array analysis focused on angiogenesis (Fig. 6 and 7, Fig. S1). This analysis indicated 10 up-regulated and 9 down-regulated proteins that were associated with angiogenesis (Fig. 8). The up-regulated expression pattern of the MMP-9 gene was also supported by protein analysis of mouse serum (Fig. 6, 7). However, no significant difference was noted between the VEGF and VEGF-B protein levels in CBDL and sham mouse serum, which was different from the data obtained in rat models (Fig. 6, 7).[10], [19]
Figure 6

Protein array analysis of serum from common bile duct ligated (CBDL) and sham operated mice.

Representative proteins identified using protein array analysis in serum isolated from CBDL mice and sham operated (sham) mice.

Figure 7

Protein array analysis of serum from common bile duct ligated (CBDL) and sham operated mice.

Mean pixel density of representative proteins analyzed by protein array in serum isolated from CBDL and sham operated mice.

Figure 8

Protein array analysis of serum from common bile duct ligated (CBDL) and sham operated mice.

Representative list of up-regulated and down-regulated proteins in the serum of common bile duct ligated mice, in comparison with the levels measured in sham operated mice by using protein array analysis. CXCL16, chemokine (CXC motif ligand 16); DLL4, delta-like ligand 4; DPPIV, dipeptidyl peptidase IV; EGF, epidermal growth factor; MMP-9, matrix metallopeptidase 9; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1; TIMP-1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1; CCL2/JE/MCP-1, chemokine (CC motif) ligand 2; NOV/CCN3/IGFBP-9, nephroblastoma overexpressed; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor.

Protein array analysis of serum from common bile duct ligated (CBDL) and sham operated mice.

Representative proteins identified using protein array analysis in serum isolated from CBDL mice and sham operated (sham) mice. Mean pixel density of representative proteins analyzed by protein array in serum isolated from CBDL and sham operated mice. Representative list of up-regulated and down-regulated proteins in the serum of common bile duct ligated mice, in comparison with the levels measured in sham operated mice by using protein array analysis. CXCL16, chemokine (CXC motif ligand 16); DLL4, delta-like ligand 4; DPPIV, dipeptidyl peptidase IV; EGF, epidermal growth factor; MMP-9, matrix metallopeptidase 9; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1; TIMP-1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1; CCL2/JE/MCP-1, chemokine (CC motif) ligand 2; NOV/CCN3/IGFBP-9, nephroblastoma overexpressed; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor.

MMPs and TIMPs protein level and localization in impaired lungs after CBDL

The next step in investigating the mechanism of lung injury was to focus on MMP-9, which we expected to act as a key protein in angiogenesis after CBDL. Immunohistochemistry analyses revealed that MMP-9 was highly expressed in vascular endothelial cells in CBDL mice (3 weeks), contrary to the finding that MMP-9 was less expressed in lungs of the sham group (Fig. 9a and b). Western blot analysis of lung whole cell lysates isolated from impaired lungs also showed high expression of MMP-9 in CBDL mice compared to sham mice (Fig. 9c). In addition, CD31-positive pulmonary vascular cell lysates showed high expression of MMP9, 3 weeks after CBDL in comparison with the CD31-negative pulmonary cells. The CD31-positive pulmonary cells also had lower F4/80 expression than CD31-negative pulmonary cells (Fig. 9d). In light of the results of the microarray analysis, in which MMP8 mRNA was highly expressed in pulmonary endothelial cells, we investigated the expression of MMP8 using immunohistochemistry. We found that MMP8 was highly expressed in the lungs of the mice 3 weeks after CBDL compared with those from sham operated mice. (Fig.9e: lungs from mice 3 weeks after CBDL, Fig.9f: lungs from sham operated mice). We also examined the expression of the MMP inhibitors, TIMP-1 and TIMP-4, in lungs of CBDL and sham operated mice. A significant difference was not found among the CBDL and sham operated mice in either TIMP-1 or TIMP-4 expression in lungs. (data not shown) In addition to these data, we investigated the presence of fibrosis in lungs after CBDL using Masson trichrome staining, since we assumed that our model had the possibility of causing pulmonary fibrosis due to the high level of MMP expression. [20]–[22] However, the results showed that our model did not induce the development of pulmonary fibrosis at either 2 or 3 weeks after CBDL compared with sham operated mice (data not shown).
Figure 9

MMP8 and MMP-9 expression in mice 3 weeks after common bile duct ligation (CBDL).

(a) Immunoreactivity of MMP-9 (matrix metallopeptidase) is stronger than that in sham-operated mice; (b) Immunohistochemical analysis. Scale bar  = 100 µm. (c) Immunoblotting of MMP-9 in the whole pulmonary tissue of the sham and of the 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL groups revealed that MMP-9 is highly expressed in the 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL groups, compared with the expression in the sham groups. (d) Immunoblotting of F4/80, CD31, and MMP9 in the CD31-positive pulmonary cell lysates obtained 3 weeks after CBDL showed higher levels of MMP9 expression in pulmonary vascular endothelial cells compared with those of CD31-negative pulmonary cells. (e) Immunoreactivity of MMP-8 is stronger than that in sham-operated mice; (f) Immunohistochemical analysis. Scale bar  = 100 µm.

MMP8 and MMP-9 expression in mice 3 weeks after common bile duct ligation (CBDL).

(a) Immunoreactivity of MMP-9 (matrix metallopeptidase) is stronger than that in sham-operated mice; (b) Immunohistochemical analysis. Scale bar  = 100 µm. (c) Immunoblotting of MMP-9 in the whole pulmonary tissue of the sham and of the 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL groups revealed that MMP-9 is highly expressed in the 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL groups, compared with the expression in the sham groups. (d) Immunoblotting of F4/80, CD31, and MMP9 in the CD31-positive pulmonary cell lysates obtained 3 weeks after CBDL showed higher levels of MMP9 expression in pulmonary vascular endothelial cells compared with those of CD31-negative pulmonary cells. (e) Immunoreactivity of MMP-8 is stronger than that in sham-operated mice; (f) Immunohistochemical analysis. Scale bar  = 100 µm.

Neutrophils increase in the lungs of mice after CBDL

To investigate whether inflammatory cells contribute to the pulmonary pathogenesis in mice after CBDL, cells were collected from BAL fluid obtained from CBDL and sham operated mice and analyzed by flow cytometry. We found that CD11b positive and Ly6G positive cells, which are defined as neutrophils, were significantly increased 2 weeks after CBDL treatment. (Fig.10 a and b) Moreover, immunohistochemistry showed that Ly6G was highly expressed in lungs both at 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL, when compared with the lungs from sham operated mice. We also investigated whether the number of macrophages, i.e., those identified as CD11b-positive and F4/80-positive cells using flow cytometry analysis, were increased in the BAL fluid of mice after CBDL. Surprisingly, we found no significant increase in macrophages contrary to findings from the CBDL rat model (data not shown). [10], [19] In addition, immunohistochemistry did not show expression of either CD68 or F4/80 in the lungs of mice that had CBDL.
Figure 10

CBDL increases the number of neutrophils in bonchoalveolar lavage fluid.

Neutrophils (CD11b-positive and Ly6G-positive cells) identified by flow cytometry were increased 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL. (a) Quantitation of total neutrophils in the BAL fluid showed a significant increase 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL compared with sham operated mice. (b) Ly6G expression is higher in the lungs of mice 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL compared with sham operated mice using immunohistochemical analysis. (Fig. 10c)

CBDL increases the number of neutrophils in bonchoalveolar lavage fluid.

Neutrophils (CD11b-positive and Ly6G-positive cells) identified by flow cytometry were increased 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL. (a) Quantitation of total neutrophils in the BAL fluid showed a significant increase 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL compared with sham operated mice. (b) Ly6G expression is higher in the lungs of mice 2 and 3 weeks after CBDL compared with sham operated mice using immunohistochemical analysis. (Fig. 10c)

Discussion

Cirrhosis results in disorders such as HPS, which is characterized by hypoxemia, high cardiac output, and extrahepatic lesions, all of which increase morbidity and mortality.[1] The same pattern of lung lesions, the pathological mechanism of which has not yet been clarified, is seen in patients with bi-directional cavopulmonary shunts.[4] Models of these diseases have been established in rats,[6], [23], [24] but to the best of our knowledge, only two studies have reported mouse models of pulmonary disease.[11], [14] We hypothesized that if a mouse model were established for this lung pathology, we could use a more extensive approach for resolving lung lesions by using transgenic or knockout mice. Therefore, we established a lung injury model by using CBDL, which incidentally had a higher survival rate than previous mouse models. [11], [14] Contrary to our expectation, lung pathology in our mouse model exhibited differences from that of rat models.[6], [10] The mechanisms responsible for the differences in pulmonary pathogenesis between mice and rats are unknown. In studies of humans with acute obstructive cholangitis (AOC) or other sepsis related to bile duct obstruction, the onset of multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) involving lungs is a complication associated with high morbidity and mortality.[1], [25] Hence, we suggest that our mouse model can be applied to pulmonary pathological analyses in the inflammatory phase, i.e., to systemic inflammatory response syndrome, acute lung injury, and MOD syndrome.[11], [26], [27] Our findings showed that TNF-α plays an important role in development of pulmonary pathology including angiogenesis not associated with release of VEGF. On the other hand, in the rat model of CBDL, TNF-α plays an important role in pulmonary angiogenesis associated with VEGF-A-mediated angiogenic pathways.[10] This phenomenon may be explained by contrasting processes related to TNF-α induction of angiogenic signaling pathways in the inflammatory phase. TNF-α is secreted by macrophages, monocytes, and endothelial cells during inflammation. Activated neutrophils work to defend against inflammation, while overstimulated neutrophils injure tissues.[28], [29] TNF-α also induces expression of proangiogenic factors and primes vascular endothelial cells for angiogenic sprouting, while simultaneously blocking VEGF-induced proliferation in vitro.[30] TNF-α has also been reported to up-regulate VEGFR-2 expression and promote angiogenesis in vitro.[31], [32] Consequently, these two types of processes may help explain differences between mice and rats in angiogenic pathways after CBDL. MMPs play an important role in the pulmonary pathogenesis of inflammatory lung diseases in human, which was reported by Kong et al.[33], [34] MMP-8 (neutrophil collagenase), which was elevated in both serum protein and pulmonary endothelial cells in this study, are released by activated neutrophils, and contributes to the formation and progression of acute lung injury and lung fibrosis.[34], [35] This pulmonary pathogenesis was confirmed by the absence of MMP-8 in mice has an antifibrotic effect to bleomycin induced lung fibrosis.[35] MMP-9 (type IV collagenase) has the ability to degrade gelatins and basement membrane collagen.[36] MMP-9 is known to exist in small quantities in healthy human lungs and to be produced at high levels by inflammatory cells (i.e., macrophages, polymorphonuclear neutrophils, and monocytes) in several lung diseases.[37] For a rodent ventilator-induced lung injury model, Kim et al. reported that lungs impaired by high tidal volume had higher expression of MMP-9 than lungs ventilated by low tidal volume and related this finding to neutrophilic inflammation.[38] Keck et al. reported that MMP-9 was a valid marker for predicting the development of lung damage and was required for migration of neutrophils into lung tissue in the rodent acute pancreatitis model.[27], [39] Johnson et al. reported that MMP-9 was required for angiogenesis in ischemic limbs and suggested that macrophages act as the source of MMP-9.[40] In the present study, we found a high level of MMP9 production in CBDL mice serum on performing protein array analysis (Fig. 6). Strong gene expression and protein production of MMP9 were detected in CD31-positive cells (Fig. 5h). Moreover, invasive and proliferative endothelial cells were mostly observed in CBDL mice by immunohistochemical and HE staining (Fig. 1–2). Taken together, these findings suggest that MMP-9, mainly derived from endothelial cells, may play an important role in regulating angiogenesis in lung injury after CBDL. The next step will be to use MMP-9 knockout mice in analyses of treatment for cirrhosis-induced lung injury. In our model, the reason that lung fibrosis, which was assessed with Masson trichrome staining, was not strongly induced might be explained as follows; firstly, MMP-9, which is secreted from increased neutrophils during inflammation plays a role in suppression of fibrosis in the tissue.[20] Secondly, unbalanced MMP and TIMP expression during the time course we used was reported to contribute to development of experimental pulmonary fibrosis: lung MMP-2 and MMP-9 m-RNA levels have peak levels and less pulmonary fibrosis is present 1 week after induction, while MMPs inhibitors, such as TIMPs, have a different peak and are present at higher levels 3 weeks after pulmonary fibrosis induction [21], [22] Lastly, the mice strain used, which was Balb/c, might have affected the development or severity of pulmonary fibrosis, as Walkin et al. described that this strain is resistant to pulmonary fibrosis, but susceptible to hepatic fibrosis. [41] Data from our CBDL model in mice did not mimic what is observed in rats particularly in regards to HPS pathophysiology, contrary to our expectations. The TNF-α inhibitor pentoxifylline has a beneficial effect on HPS development in rats model; however, no efficient improvement of arterial oxygenation could be observed in a pilot study of pentoxifylline administration against human HPS patients. [42] These findings suggest that HPS pathophysiology is complex and imply that a number of details regarding the mechanism of HPS are still unclear. However, we believe that our findings contribute to our understanding of HPS pathophysiology in humans and provide insights that may help in the development of efficacious therapies against this disease. [43] In conclusion, we have shown that pulmonary pathogenesis occurs after CBDL in a mouse model and demonstrated differences between this model and other experimental animal models of hepatopulmonary syndrome. This model, which is similar to systemic inflammatory response syndrome, can be used to assess pulmonary pathology in the activated inflammation phase. List of proteins in serum of common bile duct ligated (CBDL) mice and sham operated (control) mice in protein array analysis. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.
  42 in total

1.  MMP-9 in serum correlates with the development of pulmonary complications in experimental acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  T Keck; D Jargon; A Klünsch; O Thomusch; S Richter; V Friebe; U Adam; U T Hopt
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 2.  Hepatopulmonary syndrome.

Authors:  Victor I Machicao; Michael B Fallon
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.119

3.  Biliary cyst fluid from common bile duct-ligated rats stimulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase in pulmonary artery endothelial cells: a potential role in hepatopulmonary syndrome.

Authors:  L Liu; M Zhang; B Luo; G A Abrams; M B Fallon
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in TNF-stimulated neutrophils: novel pathways for tertiary granule release.

Authors:  Subhadeep Chakrabarti; Jennifer M Zee; Kamala D Patel
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 4.962

5.  The severity of cholestatic injury is modulated by the genetic background.

Authors:  Samuel M Alaish; Manuel Torres; Marcella Ferlito; Chen-Chih Sun; Antonio De Maio
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Hepatopulmonary syndrome in children with cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Sinan Sari; Deniz Oguz; Tugba Sucak; Buket Dalgic; Tamer Atasever
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Constitutively active endothelial Notch4 causes lung arteriovenous shunts in mice.

Authors:  Doug Miniati; Eric B Jelin; Jennifer Ng; Jianfeng Wu; Timothy R Carlson; Xiaoqing Wu; Mark R Looney; Rong A Wang
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 5.464

8.  Gene array analysis of a rat model of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations after superior cavopulmonary anastomosis.

Authors:  Russell S Tipps; Muhammed Mumtaz; Patrick Leahy; Brian W Duncan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Hepatic tumor necrosis factor-alpha production and distant organ dysfunction in a murine model of obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  E A Beierle; J N Vauthey; L L Moldawer; E M Copeland
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 10.  The neutrophil in vascular inflammation.

Authors:  Mia Phillipson; Paul Kubes
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  6 in total

1.  Does Biliodigestive Anastomosis Have Any Effect on the Reversal of Hepatopulmonary Syndrome in a Biliary Cirrhosis Experimental Model?

Authors:  Leonardo Ervolino Corbi; Ana Cristina Aoun Tannuri; Maria Julia de Aro Braz; Vitor Ribeiro Paes; Lourenço Sbragia; Rebeca Lopes Figueira; Karina Miura da Costa; Maria Cecilia Mendonça Coelho; Josiane Oliveira Gonçalves; Suellen Serafini; Uenis Tannuri
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Taurine mitigates the development of pulmonary inflammation, oxidative stress, and histopathological alterations in a rat model of bile duct ligation.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Ommati; Ali Mobasheri; Yanqin Ma; Dongmei Xu; Zhongwei Tang; Ram Kumar Manthari; Narges Abdoli; Negar Azarpira; Yu Lu; Issa Sadeghian; Abolghasem Mousavifaraz; Ali Nadgaran; Ahmad Nikoozadeh; Sahra Mazloomi; Pooria Sayar Mehrabani; Mohammad Rezaei; Hu Xin; Yang Mingyu; Hossein Niknahad; Reza Heidari
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.195

3.  Cirrhosis-induced morphological changes in the retina: possible role of endogenous opioid.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdullah Algazo; Saeed Amiri-Ghashlaghi; Bahram Delfan; Gholamreza Hassanzadeh; Fatemeh Sabbagh-Ziarani; Farahnaz Jazaeri; Ahmad Reza Dehpour
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Dexmedetomidine Attenuates Bilirubin-Induced Lung Alveolar Epithelial Cell Death In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Jian Cui; Hailin Zhao; Bin Yi; Jing Zeng; Kaizhi Lu; Daqing Ma
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Requirement of miR-9-dependent regulation of Myocd in PASMCs phenotypic modulation and proliferation induced by hepatopulmonary syndrome rat serum.

Authors:  Duo Xu; Jian-teng Gu; Bin Yi; Lin Chen; Guan-song Wang; Gui-sheng Qian; Kai-zhi Lu
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 5.310

6.  The ET-1-mediated carbonylation and degradation of ANXA1 induce inflammatory phenotype and proliferation of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells in HPS.

Authors:  Jing He; Bin Yi; Yang Chen; Qing Huang; Huan Wang; Kaizhi Lu; Weiling Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.