STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected, consecutive, nonrandomized series of patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the surgical outcomes of the simultaneous double-rod rotation technique for treating Lenke 1 thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: With the increasing popularity of segmental pedicle screw spinal reconstruction for treating AIS, concerns regarding the limited ability to correct hypokyphosis have also increased. METHODS: A consecutive series of 32 patients with Lenke 1 main thoracic AIS treated with the simultaneous double-rod rotation technique at our institution was included. Outcome measures included patient demographics, radiographical measurements, and Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire scores. RESULTS: All 32 patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years (average, 3.6 yr). The average main thoracic Cobb angle correction rate and the correction loss at the final follow-up were 67.8% and 3.3°, respectively. The average preoperative thoracic kyphosis (T5-T12) was 11.9°, which improved significantly to 20.5° (P < 0.0001) at the final follow-up. An increase in thoracic kyphosis was significantly correlated with an increase in lumbar lordosis at the final follow-up (r = 0.42). The average preoperative vertebral rotation angle was 19.7°, which improved significantly after surgery to 14.9° (P = 0.0001). There was no correlation between change in thoracic kyphosis and change in apical vertebral rotation (r =-0.123). The average preoperative total Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire score was 3.0, which significantly improved to 4.4 (P < 0.0001) at the final follow-up. Throughout surgery and even after, there were no instrumentation failures, pseudarthrosis, infection of the surgical site, or clinically relevant neurovascular complications. CONCLUSION: The simultaneous double-rod rotation technique for treating Lenke 1 AIS provides significant sagittal correction of the main thoracic curve while maintaining sagittal profiles and correcting coronal and axial deformities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected, consecutive, nonrandomized series of patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the surgical outcomes of the simultaneous double-rod rotation technique for treating Lenke 1 thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: With the increasing popularity of segmental pedicle screw spinal reconstruction for treating AIS, concerns regarding the limited ability to correct hypokyphosis have also increased. METHODS: A consecutive series of 32 patients with Lenke 1 main thoracic AIS treated with the simultaneous double-rod rotation technique at our institution was included. Outcome measures included patient demographics, radiographical measurements, and Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire scores. RESULTS: All 32 patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years (average, 3.6 yr). The average main thoracic Cobb angle correction rate and the correction loss at the final follow-up were 67.8% and 3.3°, respectively. The average preoperative thoracic kyphosis (T5-T12) was 11.9°, which improved significantly to 20.5° (P < 0.0001) at the final follow-up. An increase in thoracic kyphosis was significantly correlated with an increase in lumbar lordosis at the final follow-up (r = 0.42). The average preoperative vertebral rotation angle was 19.7°, which improved significantly after surgery to 14.9° (P = 0.0001). There was no correlation between change in thoracic kyphosis and change in apical vertebral rotation (r =-0.123). The average preoperative total Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire score was 3.0, which significantly improved to 4.4 (P < 0.0001) at the final follow-up. Throughout surgery and even after, there were no instrumentation failures, pseudarthrosis, infection of the surgical site, or clinically relevant neurovascular complications. CONCLUSION: The simultaneous double-rod rotation technique for treating Lenke 1 AIS provides significant sagittal correction of the main thoracic curve while maintaining sagittal profiles and correcting coronal and axial deformities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.