Literature DB >> 24732779

Mouse genetic background influences the dental phenotype.

Yong Li1, William S Konicki, J Timothy Wright, Cynthia Suggs, Hui Xue, Melissa A Kuehl, Ashok B Kulkarni, Carolyn W Gibson.   

Abstract

Dental enamel covers the crown of the vertebrate tooth and is considered to be the hardest tissue in the body. Enamel develops during secretion of an extracellular matrix by ameloblast cells in the tooth germ, prior to eruption of the tooth into the oral cavity. Secreted enamel proteins direct mineralization patterns during the maturation stage of amelogenesis as the tooth prepares to erupt. The amelogenins are the most abundant enamel proteins and are required for normal enamel development. Phenotypic differences were observed between incisors from individual Amelx (amelogenin) null mice that had a mixed 129xC57BL/6J genetic background and between inbred wild-type (WT) mice with different genetic backgrounds (C57BL/6J, C3H/HeJ, FVB/NJ). We hypothesized that this could be due to modifier genes, as human patients with a mutation in an enamel protein gene causing the enamel defect amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) can also have varied appearance of dentitions within a kindred. Enamel density measurements varied for all WT inbred strains midway during incisor development. Enamel thickness varied between some WT strains, and, unexpectedly, dentin density varied extensively between incisors and molars of all WT and Amelx null strains studied. WTFVB/NJ incisors were more similar to those of Amelx null mice than to those of the other WT strains in terms of incisor height/width ratio and pattern of enamel mineralization. Strain-specific differences led to the conclusion that modifier genes may be implicated in determining both normal development and severity of enamel appearance in AI mouse models and may in future studies be related to phenotypic heterogeneity within human AI kindreds reported in the literature.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24732779      PMCID: PMC4079555          DOI: 10.1159/000360157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs        ISSN: 1422-6405            Impact factor:   2.481


  50 in total

1.  Electron microscopic observations relating to the nature and development of prism decussation in mammalian dental enamel.

Authors:  A Boyde
Journal:  Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol       Date:  1969-04

2.  MMP20 active-site mutation in hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  D Ozdemir; P S Hart; O H Ryu; S J Choi; M Ozdemir-Karatas; E Firatli; N Piesco; T C Hart
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Epistatic interactions between modifier genes confer strain-specific redundancy for Tgfb1 in developmental angiogenesis.

Authors:  Yang Tang; Kyeong Sook Lee; HaiTao Yang; Darren W Logan; Susana Wang; Margaret L McKinnon; Liam J Holt; Alison Condie; Minh Thu Luu; Rosemary J Akhurst
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  FVB/N: an inbred mouse strain preferable for transgenic analyses.

Authors:  M Taketo; A C Schroeder; L E Mobraaten; K B Gunning; G Hanten; R R Fox; T H Roderick; C L Stewart; F Lilly; C T Hansen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  SSCP detection of a nonsense mutation in exon 5 of the amelogenin gene (AMGX) causing X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta (AIH1).

Authors:  N J Lench; A H Brook; G B Winter
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Amelogenesis imperfecta: a genetic study.

Authors:  B Bäckman; G Holmgren
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  SCNM1, a putative RNA splicing factor that modifies disease severity in mice.

Authors:  David A Buchner; Michelle Trudeau; Miriam H Meisler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Partial rescue of the amelogenin null dental enamel phenotype.

Authors:  Yong Li; Cynthia Suggs; J Timothy Wright; Zhi-an Yuan; Melissa Aragon; Hanson Fong; Darrin Simmons; Bill Daly; Ellis E Golub; Gerald Harrison; Ashok B Kulkarni; Carolyn W Gibson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Dental enamel development: proteinases and their enamel matrix substrates.

Authors:  John D Bartlett
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2013-09-16

10.  Mutations in the beta propeller WDR72 cause autosomal-recessive hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Walid El-Sayed; David A Parry; Roger C Shore; Mushtaq Ahmed; Hussain Jafri; Yasmin Rashid; Suhaila Al-Bahlani; Sharifa Al Harasi; Jennifer Kirkham; Chris F Inglehearn; Alan J Mighell
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  6 in total

1.  Osteopontin regulates dentin and alveolar bone development and mineralization.

Authors:  B L Foster; M Ao; C R Salmon; M B Chavez; T N Kolli; A B Tran; E Y Chu; K R Kantovitz; M Yadav; S Narisawa; J L Millán; F H Nociti; M J Somerman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Analysis of enamel development using murine model systems: approaches and limitations.

Authors:  Megan K Pugach; Carolyn W Gibson
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Enamel ribbons, surface nodules, and octacalcium phosphate in C57BL/6 Amelx-/- mice and Amelx+/- lyonization.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Hu; Charles E Smith; Zhonghou Cai; Lorenza A-J Donnelly; Jie Yang; Jan C-C Hu; James P Simmer
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.183

4.  Retinoic Acid Excess Impairs Amelogenesis Inducing Enamel Defects.

Authors:  Supawich Morkmued; Virginie Laugel-Haushalter; Eric Mathieu; Brigitte Schuhbaur; Joseph Hemmerlé; Pascal Dollé; Agnès Bloch-Zupan; Karen Niederreither
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Quantitative analysis of the core 2D arrangement and distribution of enamel rods in cross-sections of mandibular mouse incisors.

Authors:  Charles E Smith; Yuanyuan Hu; Jan C-C Hu; James P Simmer
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  High-dimensional single cell mass cytometry analysis of the murine hematopoietic system reveals signatures induced by ageing and physiological pathogen challenges.

Authors:  Christos Nikolaou; Kerstin Muehle; Stephan Schlickeiser; Alberto Sada Japp; Nadine Matzmohr; Desiree Kunkel; Marco Frentsch; Andreas Thiel
Journal:  Immun Ageing       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.400

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.