Literature DB >> 24732740

Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy during the learning curve period: comparative study with cases after the learning curve period.

Eun Jung Park1, Min Sung Kim, Gangmi Kim, Chang Hee Kim, Hyuk Hur, Byung So Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the learning curve in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of the learning curve period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients who underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy by a single surgeon between July 2006 and January 2009. Among them, 87 patients, excluding patients with stage IV (n=10) disease, were evaluated for long-term oncologic outcomes. They were divided into 2 phases: phase 1 (the learning curve period) and phase 2 (the expert period). The cumulative sum method was used for estimating the learning curve.
RESULTS: The learning curve was determined at the 42nd case. Patient characteristics and postoperative clinicopathologic outcomes were similar in both groups except for the operation time (212.5±65.0 min vs. 146.4±37.1 min; P<0.001) and length of stay (10.7±5.4 d vs. 8.4±2.9 d; P=0.015). The 5-year overall survival rates were similar in both groups throughout all stages. The 5-year disease-free survival rate of stage III disease in phase 2 (85%) was better than that of phase 1 (53.3%; P=0.046).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy during the learning curve period showed acceptable clinicopathologic outcomes. However, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was compromised in patients with stage III disease in phase I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24732740     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  7 in total

Review 1.  What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival.

Authors:  Lawrence Lee; Nathalie Wong-Chong; Justin J Kelly; George J Nassif; Matthew R Albert; John R T Monson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparative study of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted versus open rectal cancer resection during and after the learning curve period.

Authors:  Yunhua Wu; Xuejun Sun; Jie Qi; Guangbing Wei; Feibo Cui; Qi Gao; Junhui Yu; Kai Wang; Jianbao Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Post-Operative Complications and Nipple Necrosis Rates Between Conventional and Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Jeea Lee; Hyung Seok Park; Haemin Lee; Dong Won Lee; Seung Yong Song; Dae Hyun Lew; Jee Ye Kim; Seho Park; Seung Il Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Effect of the learning curve on survival after laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal metastases.

Authors:  Hiba Shanti; Rakesh Raman; Saurav Chakravartty; Ajay P Belgaumkar; Ameet G Patel
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-03-08

6.  Cumulative Sum Analysis of the Learning Curve of Free Flap Reconstruction in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Seung Hoon Han; Young Chul Kim; Tack-Kyun Kwon; Doh Young Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.340

7.  Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review.

Authors:  Zubair Bayat; Keegan Guidolin; Basheer Elsolh; Charmaine De Castro; Erin Kennedy; Anand Govindarajan
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-09-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.