Literature DB >> 24732435

Non-DSB clustered DNA lesions induced by ionizing radiation are largely responsible for the loss of plasmid DNA functionality in the presence of cisplatin.

S Kouass Sahbani1, M Rezaee2, P Cloutier2, L Sanche2, D J Hunting2.   

Abstract

The combination of cisplatin and ionizing radiation (IR) increases cell toxicity by both enhancing DNA damage and inhibiting repair mechanisms. Although the formation of cluster DNA lesions, particularly double-strand breaks (DSB) at the site of cisplatin-DNA-adducts has been reported to induce cell death, the contribution of DSB and non-DSB cluster lesions to the cellular toxicity is still unknown. Although both lesions are toxic, it is not always possible to measure their frequency and cell survival in the same model system. To overcome this problem, here, we investigate the effect of cisplatin-adducts on the induction of DSB and non-DSB cluster DNA lesions by IR and determine the impact of such lesions on plasmid functionality. Cluster lesions are two or more lesions on opposite DNA strands with a short distance such that error free repair is difficult or impossible. At a ratio of two cisplatin per plasmid, irradiation of platinated DNA in solution with (137)Cs γ-rays shows enhancements in the formation of DNA DSB and non-DSB cluster lesions by factors of 2.6 and 2.1, respectively, compared to unmodified DNA. However, in absolute terms, the yield for non-DSB cluster lesions is far larger than that for DSB, by a factor of 26. Unmodified and cisplatin-modified DNA were irradiated and subsequently transformed into Escherichia coli to give survival curves representing the functionality of the plasmid DNA as a function of radiation dose. Our results demonstrate that non-DSB cluster lesions are the only toxic lesions present at a sufficient frequency to account for the loss of DNA functionality. Our data also show that Frank-DSB lesions are simply too infrequent to account for the loss of DNA functionality. In conclusion, non-DSB cluster DNA damage is known to be difficult to repair and is probably the lesion responsible for the loss of functionality of DNA modified by cisplatin.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cisplatin; DNA damage and repair; Ionizing radiation; Non-DSB cluster damage; Plasmid functionality; Radiosensitization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24732435     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2014.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Biol Interact        ISSN: 0009-2797            Impact factor:   5.192


  4 in total

1.  DNA damage response (DDR) pathway engagement in cisplatin radiosensitization of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Catherine R Sears; Sean A Cooney; Helen Chin-Sinex; Marc S Mendonca; John J Turchi
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-03-03

Review 2.  Stress-induced DNA damage biomarkers: applications and limitations.

Authors:  Zacharenia Nikitaki; Christine E Hellweg; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.221

3.  Electron impact ionisation cross sections of cis- and trans-diamminedichloridoplatinum(II) and its hydrolysis products.

Authors:  Stefan E Huber; Daniel Süß; Michael Probst; Andreas Mauracher
Journal:  Mol Phys       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 1.962

4.  Short-Term Efficacy of Different First-Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Bei-Bei Zhang; Weibo Zhu; Jun Tao; Yun Li; Chuan-Chong Du; Yun-Xia Chen; Yan-Dong Liu
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.689

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.