Literature DB >> 24732386

Can technology help to reduce underage drinking? Evidence from the false ID laws with scanner provision.

Barış K Yörük1.   

Abstract

Underage drinkers often use false identification to purchase alcohol or gain access into bars. In recent years, several states have introduced laws that provide incentives to retailers and bar owners who use electronic scanners to ensure that the customer is 21 years or older and uses a valid identification to purchase alcohol. This paper is the first to investigate the effects of these laws using confidential data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1997 Cohort (NLSY97). Using a difference-in-differences methodology, I find that the false ID laws with scanner provision significantly reduce underage drinking, including up to a 0.22 drink decrease in the average number of drinks consumed by underage youth per day. This effect is observed particularly in the short-run and more pronounced for non-college students and those who are relatively younger. These results are also robust under alternative model specifications. The findings of this paper highlight the importance of false ID laws in reducing alcohol consumption among underage youth.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol consumption; False ID laws with scanner provision; Minimum legal drinking age; Risky behavior; Underage youth

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24732386      PMCID: PMC4057953          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  14 in total

1.  The effects of alcohol use on academic achievement in high school.

Authors:  Ana I Balsa; Laura M Giuliano; Michael T French
Journal:  Econ Educ Rev       Date:  2011-02

2.  How do Zero Tolerance Drunk Driving Laws work?

Authors:  Christopher Carpenter
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Gender and the influence of peer alcohol consumption on adolescent sexual activity.

Authors:  Glen R Waddell
Journal:  Econ Inq       Date:  2012

4.  Social host liability for minors and underage drunk-driving accidents.

Authors:  Angela K Dills
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  The impact of minimum legal drinking age laws on alcohol consumption, smoking, and marijuana use: evidence from a regression discontinuity design using exact date of birth.

Authors:  Barış K Yörük; Ceren Ertan Yörük
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  The minimum legal drinking age and marijuana use: new estimates from the NLSY97.

Authors:  Benjamin Crost; Daniel I Rees
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Reducing underage alcohol and tobacco use: evidence from the introduction of vertical identification cards.

Authors:  Andriana Bellou; Rachana Bhatt
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  The impact of drinking on psychological well-being: evidence from minimum drinking age laws in the United States.

Authors:  Ceren Ertan Yörük; Barış K Yörük
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The Effect of Alcohol Consumption on Mortality: Regression Discontinuity Evidence from the Minimum Drinking Age.

Authors:  Christopher Carpenter; Carlos Dobkin
Journal:  Am Econ J Appl Econ       Date:  2009-01-01

10.  Legalization of Sunday alcohol sales and alcohol consumption in the United States.

Authors:  Barış K Yörük
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  4 in total

1.  Did Legalization of Sunday Alcohol Sales Increase Crime in the United States? Evidence From Seven States.

Authors:  Bariş K Yörük; Jungtaek Lee
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.582

2.  Assessing the Impact of Twenty Underage Drinking Laws.

Authors:  James C Fell; Michael Scherer; Sue Thomas; Robert B Voas
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.582

3.  The Utility of Including the Strengths of Underage Drinking Laws in Determining Their Effect on Outcomes.

Authors:  James C Fell; Michael Scherer; Robert Voas
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  How Strong is the "Fake ID Effect?" An Examination Using Propensity Score Matching in Two Samples.

Authors:  John Stogner; Julia A Martinez; Bryan Lee Miller; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.455

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.