Literature DB >> 24732282

Comparative genomics of flatworms (platyhelminthes) reveals shared genomic features of ecto- and endoparastic neodermata.

Christoph Hahn1, Bastian Fromm, Lutz Bachmann.   

Abstract

The ectoparasitic Monogenea comprise a major part of the obligate parasitic flatworm diversity. Although genomic adaptations to parasitism have been studied in the endoparasitic tapeworms (Cestoda) and flukes (Trematoda), no representative of the Monogenea has been investigated yet. We present the high-quality draft genome of Gyrodactylus salaris, an economically important monogenean ectoparasite of wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). A total of 15,488 gene models were identified, of which 7,102 were functionally annotated. The controversial phylogenetic relationships within the obligate parasitic Neodermata were resolved in a phylogenomic analysis using 1,719 gene models (alignment length of >500,000 amino acids) for a set of 16 metazoan taxa. The Monogenea were found basal to the Cestoda and Trematoda, which implies ectoparasitism being plesiomorphic within the Neodermata and strongly supports a common origin of complex life cycles. Comparative analysis of seven parasitic flatworm genomes identified shared genomic features for the ecto- and endoparasitic lineages, such as a substantial reduction of the core bilaterian gene complement, including the homeodomain-containing genes, and a loss of the piwi and vasa genes, which are considered essential for animal development. Furthermore, the shared loss of functional fatty acid biosynthesis pathways and the absence of peroxisomes, the latter organelles presumed ubiquitous in eukaryotes except for parasitic protozoans, were inferred. The draft genome of G. salaris opens for future in-depth analyses of pathogenicity and host specificity of poorly characterized G. salaris strains, and will enhance studies addressing the genomics of host-parasite interactions and speciation in the highly diverse monogenean flatworms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gyrodactylus salaris; draft genome; flatworms; genomic adaptations; parasitism; phylogenomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24732282      PMCID: PMC4040987          DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Biol Evol        ISSN: 1759-6653            Impact factor:   3.416


Introduction

Obligate parasitic flatworms constitute one of the three largest groups of metazoan parasites of vertebrates (the others being the nematodes and arthropods) and include many species of medical and veterinary importance. Schistosomes, for example, are responsible for about 300,000 human deaths annually (van der Werf et al. 2003), and a range of tapeworms cause morbidity and mortality in humans and domestic livestock (e.g., Echinococcus, Taenia, and Diphyllobothrium). The phylogenetic relationships of the phylum Platyhelminthes and the major lineages within have been intensively discussed for decades. Initially, the main challenge was the basal position within Bilateria and the potential paraphyly with acoelomorph flatworms. Recent studies (Baguna and Riutort 2004; Hejnol et al. 2009; Philippe et al. 2011) provided strong evidence for Platyhelminthes and Acoelomorpha being separate phyla, with Acoelomorpha basal within Bilateria. Accordingly, Platyhelminthes would include the remaining free-living and parasitic flatworms and represent derived protostomian lophotrochozoans (Baguna and Riutort 2004). Genome-wide data are currently only available for a few platyhelminth species including the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea (Robb et al. 2008), a model for stem cell biology (Gentile et al. 2011), and some important human parasites, including the flukes Schistosoma mansoni (Berriman et al. 2009), S. japonicum (), and Clonorchis sinensis (Wang et al. 2011), and the tapeworms Echinococcus multilocularis, E. granulosus (Zheng et al. 2013), Taenia solium, and Hymenolepis microstoma (Tsai et al. 2013). No genome-wide data have yet been published for a monogenean species. The obligate parasitic flatworms form the monophyletic Neodermata, a well-established lineage based on the name giving Neodermis. This larval secondary syncytial tegument is believed to be the key innovation of Neodermata that allowed for their immense radiation (Littlewood 2006). The Neodermata currently comprise the Monogenea (Monopisthocotylea and Polyopisthocotylea), Cestoda (tapeworms; Eucestoda and Cestodaria), and Trematoda (flukes; Aspidogastrea and Digenea) (reviewed in Olson and Tkach (2005)). The Monogenea are characterized by a direct ectoparasitic lifestyle, whereas the Cestoda and Trematoda engage in endoparasitic life cycles of varying complexity. Traditional views on the evolution of Neodermata based on morphology (Janicki 1920), as well as early molecular studies using 18S ribosomal DNA markers (Littlewood et al. 1999), supported an early divergence of the Trematoda and a sister group relationship of Monogenea and Cestoda (reviewed in Lockyer et al. 2003). More recently, a sister group relationship between Cestoda and Trematoda was supported by nucleotide sequences of the combined 18S and 28S ribosomal genes (Lockyer et al. 2003), mitochondrial DNA (Park et al. 2007; Perkins et al. 2010), and microRNA loci (Fromm et al. 2013). Understanding the phylogenetic relationships within the Neodermata is an essential prerequisite for understanding the evolutionary origins of endo- and ectoparasitism as well as of the complex life cycles of flatworms. Based on the recently published genomes of the tapeworms E. multilocularis, E. granulosus, T. solium, and H. microstoma, Tsai et al. (2013) presented several genomic traits interpreted as adaptations to the parasitic lifestyle in flatworms. Their conclusions, however, must be considered preliminary because no representative of the Monogenea had been included in the analyses, hindering a comprehensive assessment of the issue. This study targets the genome of G. salaris Malmberg 1957, a significant pathogen of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) causing severe ecological and economic damage in Norway and Russia (Harris et al. 2011). We present the draft genome of G. salaris assembled from combined Roche 454 FLX Titanium and Illumina GAII NGS reads, and provide the first genomic reference for a monogenean flatworm. The controversial phylogenetic relationships within Neodermata were addressed using a large-scale phylogenomic approach. Furthermore, recently reported gains and losses of genetic traits as either specific for parasitic flatworms or tapeworms (Tsai et al. 2013) were assessed. With the monogenean draft genome at hand, their significance for the evolution of ecto- and endoparasitism in flatworms is discussed.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection, DNA Extraction, and Next-Generation Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from a pooled sample of ∼15,000 individuals of G. salaris obtained from an experimentally reared parasite population on Atlantic Salmon (Salte et al. 2010) using the E.Z.N.A. Tissue DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek) following the Tissue DNA-Spin Protocol. Library preparation and the Roche 454 FLX Titanium and Illumina GAII sequencing were performed at the Norwegian Sequencing Centre (Oslo, Norway). The Illumina reads were trimmed and end-clipped to a phred score of 33 using custom scripts and subsequently error corrected using the error correction tool of the SOAPdenovo2 software (Luo et al. 2012). For the use in Overlap Layout Consensus (OLC) assemblers, the data set was digitally normalized to a k-mer coverage of 20 using tools from the khmer package (Pell et al. 2012).

De Novo Assembly of G. salaris Genomic NGS Reads and Removal of Nontarget Sequences

In order to optimally assemble the draft genome for G. salaris a range of de Bruijn graph (DBG) assemblers, that is, Velvet 1.2.07 (Zerbino and Birney 2008), ABySS 1.3.4 (Simpson et al. 2009), SOAPdenovo 1.0.5 (Li et al. 2010b) were utilized on the Illumina reads. Furthermore, hybrid assemblies of 454 and normalized Illumina GAII data were performed using the OLC assemblers Newbler 2.6 (Margulies et al. 2005) and Celera 7.0 (Myers et al. 2000). Sequence assemblies obtained by DBG and OLC approaches were quality assessed using standard assembly metrics such as N50, total number of contigs, and total length of the assembly (supplementary file S2, table S1, Supplementary Material online). Guanine–Cytosine (GC)-coverage scatter plots (Kumar and Blaxter 2011) were produced for the assemblies (fig. 1 and supplementary file S1, fig. S1, Supplementary Material online) and the conjunction of all information was used to choose the best assembly (see supplementary file S1, Section A for details, Supplementary Material online). Putative nontarget contigs were removed prior to subsequent analyses (supplementary file S1, Section A for details, Supplementary Material online). Completeness of the gene space in the draft was assessed using CEGMA 2.3 (Parra et al. 2007, 2009). Trimmed Illumina reads were mapped back to the conservative draft assembly using BWA (Li and Durbin 2009) in order to identify the putative G. salaris readpool. K-mer frequencies (20-mer) were subsequently calculated for this readpool using respective tools from the khmer package (Pell et al. 2012) in order to estimate the G. salaris genome size based on the k-mer frequency distribution (Li et al. 2010a) (see supplementary file S1, Section A, Supplementary Material online). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were called using Freebayes (Garrison and Marth 2012) and SNP density and transition/transversion ratio were calculated using VCFtools (Danecek et al. 2011). To minimize false positives, SNPs called at positions with low (<20×) and high coverage (>100×) were not considered.
F

Aggregate properties (coverage and GC content) of contigs obtained by Celera 7.0 as (a) scatter plot and (b) heat map. Colored areas in (a) illustrate the aggressive cleaning strategy adopted in this study, that is, the removal of putative nontarget contigs of coverage <40× (red; putative host contamination) and GC content >50% (blue; putative bacterial contamination) (see supplementary file S1, Section A for details, Supplementary Material online).

Aggregate properties (coverage and GC content) of contigs obtained by Celera 7.0 as (a) scatter plot and (b) heat map. Colored areas in (a) illustrate the aggressive cleaning strategy adopted in this study, that is, the removal of putative nontarget contigs of coverage <40× (red; putative host contamination) and GC content >50% (blue; putative bacterial contamination) (see supplementary file S1, Section A for details, Supplementary Material online).

Gene Prediction and Annotation

A G. salaris specific library of repeat families, including simple repeats, interspersed repeats, and satellite DNAs was identified from the assembled draft genome using Repeat Modeler (Smit and Hubley 2008–2010). Subsequently, the automated annotation pipeline MAKER 2.26 (Holt and Yandell 2011) was used for structural annotation (supplementary file S1, Section B for details, Supplementary Material online). Repetitive DNA was masked using RepeatMasker (Smit et al. 1996–2010) and the G. salaris specific repeat library. MAKER then reconciled homology-based physical evidence with the results of purely ab initio predicted gene models obtained by means of the gene predictors GeneMark (Lomsadze et al. 2005), SNAP (Korf 2004), and Augustus (Stanke and Waack 2003) (see supplementary file S1, Section B for further details, Supplementary Material online). All gene models were screened for known domains using InterProScan5RC6 (Quevillon et al. 2005) and subjected to a BLAST search (Altschul et al. 1997) against a custom build of NCBI’s nr protein database (restricted to Metazoan proteins). B2G4pipe 2.5 (Conesa et al. 2005) was used to establish functional annotations, that is, to assign putative biological functions and Gene Ontology terms (Ashburner et al. 2000) to the G. salaris gene models. The initial functional annotations were reconciled with the InterProScan results and mapped onto metabolic pathways included in the KEGG database (Kanehisa et al. 2012) using blast2GO v. 2.6.6 (Conesa et al. 2005; Gotz et al. 2008). For comparative reasons, the same procedure was also performed for the gene sets of S. mediterranea, E. multilocularis, S. mansoni, Caenorhabditis elegans, Lottia gigantea, and Helobdella robusta.

Analyses of Gene Models

Basic statistics for obtained G. salaris gene models, including average intron/exon lengths and number of introns, were calculated using custom scripts. The functionally annotated gene models were screened for the presence/absence of selected genomic traits that were specifically addressed in a recent study on cestode genomes (Tsai et al. 2013) (see supplementary file S1, Section D for details, Supplementary Material online).

Gene Orthology Search, Cluster Selection, and Phylogenomic Analyses

The protein complements of 16 metazoan taxa (supplementary file S2, table S2, Supplementary Material online) were searched for reciprocal best hits using BLAST (Altschul et al. 1997), and the results were subsequently used for identifying orthologous gene clusters by using the MCL algorithm (van Dongen 2000) following Fischer et al. (2011). An inflation parameter of 2.1 was used as previously described (Smith et al. 2011). For subsequent phylogenetic analyses of metazoan relationships, a set of putative orthologous gene clusters was selected based on criteria used in previous studies (Dunn et al. 2008; Hejnol et al. 2009) with minor modifications: Clusters of putative orthologous genes were required to 1) include at least eight taxa (i.e., ≥50%), 2) include at least one taxon from each of the four platyhelminth groups, 3) have a mean of <5 sequences per taxon, and 4) have a median of <2 sequences per taxon. Sequences of each accepted cluster were aligned using Clustal Omega (Sievers et al. 2011). Ambiguously aligned regions were removed using Aliscore and Alicut (Kück 2009; Misof and Misof 2009). Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees were inferred individually for each gene cluster with RAxML 7.3.2 (Stamatakis 2006) using the best-fitting amino acid substitution model as determined by the RAxML amino acid substitution model selection Perl script. Individual tree robustness was evaluated with 100 bootstrap pseudo replicates. Clusters of putative orthologous genes were then divided into classes 1) containing no paralogs, 2) containing only monophyletic paralogs (i.e., putative in-paralogs), or 3) containing paraphyletic paralogs (i.e., putative out-paralogs), using custom scripts. The latter clusters were omitted from further analyses. Clusters containing in-paralogs were subjected to monophyly masking, that is, all but one representative paralog per taxon were removed from the alignment. For each such cluster, multiple alignments including only one paralog at a time were constructed using Clustal Omega (Sievers et al. 2011) and trimmed using Aliscore and Alicut (Kück 2009; Misof and Misof 2009). Custom scripts were used to assess all alignments and select the final alignment for each cluster using only the particular paralog that yielded the longest alignment after trimming, that is, caused the smallest number of ambiguously aligned positions in the alignment. If several paralogs ranked equally, one was chosen randomly. Clusters without paralogs (Class 1) and the monophyly masked clusters (Class 2) were concatenated to a supermatrix using FASconCAT (Kuck and Meusemann 2010), after removing any clusters yielding alignments shorter than 100 amino acid positions. ML analyses were performed on the final matrix using RAxML 7.8.3 (Stamatakis 2006). The data set was partitioned according to the individual genes and the best-fitting amino acid substitution model, as determined by the RAxML amino acid substitution model selection Perl script, was applied to each partition. ML tree robustness was assessed using 100 bootstrap pseudo replicates. Bayesian inference (BI) was performed using the CAT-GTR model (Lartillot and Philippe 2004) as implemented in Phylobayes-MPI 1.3b (Lartillot et al. 2013). BI was run for 2,000 generations in five parallel chains. The initial 500 generations were discarded as burn in, well after convergence (MaxDiff values below 0.3). A 50% consensus tree was computed from the remaining 1,500 trees from each chain. BI tree robustness was assessed using posterior probabilities. In addition, ML and BI were inferred for a concatenated alignment of a reduced set of genes with the strongest phylogenetic signal (average bootstrap support ≥80). This method was recently proposed to reduce potential incongruence in phylogenomic analyses (Salichos and Rokas 2013). The same study emphasized that bootstrap values can be misleading in large phylogenomic data sets and introduced internode certainty (IC) as a more sensitive metric for the detection of incongruence. However, only genes that are represented in all taxa can currently be taken into account for the calculation of IC. For the above described data set of 16 metazoan taxa, IC would be based on <50% of the genes. To overcome this limitation, we compiled a further data set targeting exclusively lophotrochozoan taxa. Clusters of orthologous genes were required to 1) include all 10 lophotrochozoan taxa, 2) have a mean of <5 sequences per taxon, and 3) have a median of <2 sequences per taxon. Nonlophotrochozoan taxa were removed and individual alignments were subsequently processed (aligned, trimmed, and monophyly masked) as described above. The data set was finally reduced to exclusively genes with strongest phylogenetic signal (in this case an average bootstrap support threshold of 90 was feasible), and phylogenetic analyses were performed as described above. IC was inferred using RAxML 8.0.3 (Stamatakis 2006). See supplementary file S1, Section C for more details, Supplementary Material online. The scripts used for the preparation of data were made freely available (https://github.com/chrishah/phylog/, last accessed April 30, 2014).

Results

Genome Sequencing and Gene Prediction

Five de novo assemblers were tested and the result obtained by Celera 7.0 (Myers et al. 2000) was selected as the best conservative draft assembly for G. salaris (fig. 1) based on basic assembly metrics (e.g., N50) and the inferred robustness against putative nontarget reads (see supplementary file S1, Section A, and supplementary file S2, table S1 for details, Supplementary Material online). Furthermore, unlike other assemblers Celera 7.0 used both Roche 454 FLX Titanium and Illumina GAII reads in a simultaneous hybrid assembly. The shotgun sequencing strategy combined 0.6 Gb Roche 454 FLX Titanium (average read length 514 bp) and 19.8 Gb Illumina GAII (read length 76 bp; paired end insert size 167 ± 40 bp) reads. After removal of putative nontarget contigs, the draft genome comprised 6,075 contigs (>200 bp; N50 18.4 kb; average coverage ∼126×) totaling 67.4 Mb (GC content 33.84%). The gene space was estimated to be >89.11% complete using CEGMA (Parra et al. 2007). The two most conservative CEGMA reference gene sets were recovered at a rate of >95% in the draft genome of G. salaris. A total of 25.68% of the assembly was identified as repetitive, and the genome size was estimated as ∼120 Mb (see supplementary file S1, Section A, Supplementary Material online). The assembled sequences of the G. salaris draft genome were deposited in GenBank (BioProject ID PRJNA244375) and can furthermore be obtained from the Gyrodactylus salaris genome project’s web page (http://invitro.titan.uio.no/gyrodactylus/, last accessed April 30, 2014). We identified a total of 93,185 SNPs (SNP density 1.55 SNPs/kb) with a transition/transversion ratio of 0.92. Structural gene annotation produced 15,488 gene models, of which 8,637 contained functional domains. Functional annotation was achieved for 7,102 gene models (supplementary file S1, Section D and fig. S4, Supplementary Material online). The average G. salaris gene model was 2.7 kb long, contained four exons with an average length of 289-bp coding for a 906-bp transcript. Overall, the average intron length was 659 bp. However, when looking at introns according to their position within genes, it turned out that the average intron length decreased significantly (Pearson’s product-moment correlation ρ = −0.88, P = 8.19 × 10−9) with increasing ordinal position (see supplementary file S1, fig. S11, Supplementary Material online).

Phylogenomic Analysis

The orthology search for the metazoan data set identified 38,568 orthologous gene clusters, out of which 3,121 passed the selection criteria (see Materials and Methods section). A total of 548 orthologous gene clusters contained no paralogs, and 1,303 clusters contained only monophyletic paralogs. The supermatrix for phylogenomic analyses of the metazoan data set contained 1,719 gene clusters ≥100 amino acids (aa), and comprised a total of 519,023 aa positions (supplementary files S3 and S2, table S4, Supplementary Material online). Within the Platyhelminthes, the monophyly of the Neodermata with a basal position of the ectoparasitic Monogenea and a sister group relationship of the endoparasitic Trematoda and Cestoda was highly supported in all analyses (fig. 2). With respect to deep metazoan relationships, the phylogenetic tree obtained using BI (supplementary fig. S6, Supplementary Material online) is in agreement with previously published results and recovers the monophyly of Chordata, Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Platyhelminthes with high statistical support. The phylogenomic reconstructions using a subset of the metazoan data set, that is, including exclusively the 173 gene models with the strongest phylogenetic signal (average bootstrap support of gene trees ≥80; supplementary file S2, table S5 and supplementary file S4, Supplementary Material online) consistently recovered the same tree topology (see supplementary file S1, fig. S5 for ML and fig. S6 for BI, Supplementary Material online). The ML tree for the full metazoan data set differed from the BI tree in the position of the nematode C. elegans, which was recovered in a sister group relationship to the Platyhelminthes. This is likely an artifact caused by long branch attraction (Felsenstein 1987; see supplementary file S1, Section C for more detailed discussion, Supplementary Material online). The lophotrochozoan data set of genes with strongest phylogenetic signal (average bootstrap support ≥90) comprised a total of 312 genes and 135,085 aa positions (supplementary files S5 and S2, table S6, Supplementary Material online). Both BI and ML analyses of this data set strongly supported a basal position of the Monogenea and a sister relationship of Cestoda and Trematoda (fig. 2). IC values are based on 311 individual gene trees.
F

Phylogenetic relationships among the major groups of parasitic flatworms. BI topology (CAT-GTR model) based on a supermatrix containing the 312 gene models (135,085 amino acid positions) with the strongest phylogenetic signal (average bootstrap ≥90). Full circles represent nodes with posterior probability = 1 and boostrap support of 100. Numbers next to internodes represent IC, and are based on a subset of 311 genes available for the full taxon set.

Phylogenetic relationships among the major groups of parasitic flatworms. BI topology (CAT-GTR model) based on a supermatrix containing the 312 gene models (135,085 amino acid positions) with the strongest phylogenetic signal (average bootstrap ≥90). Full circles represent nodes with posterior probability = 1 and boostrap support of 100. Numbers next to internodes represent IC, and are based on a subset of 311 genes available for the full taxon set.

Genome-Wide Reduction of Bilaterian Genes

We identified a total of 1,490 orthologous gene clusters, which contained representatives of all 15 bilaterian taxa (supplementary file S2, table S2, Supplementary Material online). A total of 315 clusters were found to lack G. salaris genes, while containing genes of each of the eight nonneodermatan bilaterians. Similarly, 277 and 230 gene clusters were lacking gene models of Cestoda and Trematoda, respectively. Integrating these results indicates that 158 bilaterian core genes have been lost throughout the Neodermata (fig. 3). For the other bilaterians included in the data set much lower numbers of lineage-specific losses were observed, that is, 23 in L. gigantea (Mollusca), 36 in H. robusta (Annelida), 99 in S. mediterranea (Turbellaria), 110 in C. elegans (Nematoda), 46 in Daphnia pulex (Arthropoda), and 8 in Homo sapiens (Chordata).
F

Venn diagram illustrating the number of gene clusters devoid of orthologous genes of one to three parasitic flatworm groups, while present in all other nonneodermatan Bilateria in the data set.

Venn diagram illustrating the number of gene clusters devoid of orthologous genes of one to three parasitic flatworm groups, while present in all other nonneodermatan Bilateria in the data set.

Specific Genomic Features in Parasitic Flatworms

The gene complement of G. salaris was analyzed with respect to recently proposed genomic adaptations to parasitism in flatworms (Tsai et al. 2013). A total of 55 DEAD/DEAH box helicase containing gene models were identified for G. salaris. However, the ubiquitous stem-cell-specific RNA helicase vasa (DDX4) was absent. One gene model was found orthologous to the structurally very similar PL10 (DDX3) gene, and clustered within a clade consisting exclusively of parasitic flatworm PL10 (supplementary file S1, fig. S8, Supplementary Material online). The G. salaris homeodomain-containing gene complement comprised 79 gene models, which could be assigned to 52 families within nine classes (supplementary file S1, fig. S7 and supplementary file S2, table S7, Supplementary Material online). All classes reported earlier for tapeworms and flukes were represented, and 23 of the 24 homeodomain genes previously described as lost in flukes and tapeworms (Tsai et al. 2013) were absent in G. salaris as well; however, Vsx was represented in the draft genome. A further 10 losses were detected in G. salaris, three of them shared with tapeworms (Gbx, Bari, and Rax), four with flukes (Mkx, Zeb, Cux, and Hox3), and three appeared specific to the monogenean lineage (Meox, En, and Pou2) (fig. 4). The piwi subfamily was not detected in the G. salaris genome. However, two argonaute gene models were found in the G. salaris gene complement, which clustered within the AGO family and a further clade comprising exclusively flatworm sequences, respectively (supplementary file S1, fig. S9, Supplementary Material online).
F

Pattern of inferred homeobox gene family loss during the evolution of obligate parasitism in flatworms. Putative convergent losses are indicated in red (Monogenea and Cestoda) and green (Monogenea and Trematoda).

Pattern of inferred homeobox gene family loss during the evolution of obligate parasitism in flatworms. Putative convergent losses are indicated in red (Monogenea and Cestoda) and green (Monogenea and Trematoda). The intron length distribution of G. salaris gene models had two prominent modes at ∼32 bp (subsequently referred to as short mode) and ∼58 bp (long mode) (supplementary file S1, fig. S10 compares the intron length distributions of four flatworm taxa, Supplementary Material online). A total of 14,342 introns (31%) were shorter than 100 bp, whereas the remaining 31,312 introns (69%) exceeded 100 bp (ranging up to ∼20,000 bp in length), which resulted in an average intron length of 659 bp. The ratio of the occurrence of introns of the two modes changed with their ordinal position within the genes. Ordinal intron positions 1 and 2 were dominated by short mode introns, whereas the long mode introns dominated at ordinal positions >3 (supplementary file S1, fig. S12, Supplementary Material online). Echinococcus multilocularis orthologs of G. salaris genes, which contained introns falling into either the short or the long length mode, were more likely themselves to contain introns of the corresponding short/long mode in E. multilocularis than expected by chance (see supplementary file S1, Section D and supplementary file S2, table S8, Supplementary Material online). In total, eight heat shock protein (Hsp) 70 gene models were identified in the G. salaris draft genome. All Hsp70 subfamilies previously reported for flatworms (Tsai et al. 2013), that is, Hsp110, ER Hsp70, mitochondrial Hsp70, and flatworm cytosolic Hsp70 were present, and each subfamily was represented by one to two gene copies (supplementary file S1, fig. S16, Supplementary Material online). None of the Hsp70 genes detected for G. salaris clustered with tapeworm-specific Hsp70 genes reported by Tsai et al. (2013). The four peroxisome marker proteins PEX3, PEX10, PEX12, and PEX19, proposed earlier as unequivocal in silico indicators for the presence of peroxisomes (Schluter et al. 2006), were not detected in the G. salaris draft genome, nor in the gene complement of S. mansoni or E. multilocularis. However, we detected indication of all four marker proteins in the genomes of the free-living flatworm S. mediterranea, as well as the mollusc L. gigantea, the annelid H. robusta, and the nematode C. elegans. The majority of genes encoding key enzymes necessary for fatty acid synthesis was absent from the G. salaris gene complement. Only the acetyl-CoA carboxylase, involved in fatty acid precursor production, could be detected (supplementary file S1, fig. S13, Supplementary Material online). The enzyme complement of fatty acid metabolism and -elongation, however, was found to be largely complete (supplementary file S1, figs. S14 and S15, Supplementary Material online). Furthermore, a range of fatty acid binding and -transport proteins were identified (supplementary file S2, table S12, Supplementary Material online).

Discussion

In recent years, several genomes of platyhelminths have become available. Species causing severe human diseases, such as the blood flukes S. mansoni (Berriman et al. 2009) and S. japonicum (), were the first to be studied at a genomic level, and recently four tapeworm genomes of public health interest were published (Tsai et al. 2013; Zheng et al. 2013), forming the basis for comparative genomic analyses in order to identify specific evolutionary adaptations to the obligate parasitic lifestyle in flatworms. Accordingly, Tsai et al. (2013) proposed a number of genomic features for parasitic flatworms; however, their conclusions must be considered preliminary because the phylogenetic relationships within Neodermata were not resolved, and there was no representative of the Monogenea, the third major parasitic group, included in their comparative genomic analysis.

The G. salaris Genome

The size of the G. salaris genome, calculated as ∼120 Mb, was found in the same order of magnitude as other platyhelminth genomes, including the sequenced tapeworms, which range between 115 and 151 Mb (Tsai et al. 2013; Zheng et al. 2013). Using shallow sequencing data, the genome size of the closely related sibling species Gyrodactylus thymalli was recently estimated at ∼170 Mb (Hahn et al. 2013). This estimate, however, can only be interpreted as an upper limit because the authors had only little information on the ratio of host and other nontarget DNA in the analyzed total DNA extract. Although genome assembly for metazoans with relatively small genome size has improved greatly over the past years to the point where it has become a democratized, bottom-up enterprise (Kumar et al. 2012), a number of challenges remain for small invertebrates. The very small amounts of genomic DNA that can be extracted from single individuals may be insufficient for the needs of some NGS applications. Low DNA yield is also an issue for Gyrodactylus as individual parasites contain only about 1,000 cells (Bakke et al. 2007). Whole-genome amplification (WGA) approaches may overcome this obstacle (Rodrigue et al. 2009), but in turn may imply other problems such as amplification of nontarget DNA, which can confuse genome assembly. Furthermore, bias in the WGA may leave large regions of the genome unsequenced (Rodrigue et al. 2009). In order to provide enough genomic DNA for NGS sequencing of G. salaris—in particular for the Roche 454 FLX Titanium pyrosequencing—we chose the strategy of extracting DNA from a pooled sample. The sampled population was reared experimentally under controlled conditions (Salte et al. 2010), and genetic heterozygosity was expected to be low. Indeed, the observed SNP density was less than half of the recently described 1/288 bp (3.47 SNPs/kb) for S. japonicum (Liu et al. 2006). As Gyrodactylus feeds on host mucus and epithelial cells approximately every 15–30 min (Cable et al. 2002), host cells and bacteria of the host skin epiflora will always be present in the gut of the parasites. The inevitable coextraction of this nontarget DNA further complicates genome assembly of G. salaris. As the host genome is about one order of magnitude larger (estimated to 3 × 109 bp (Davidson et al. 2010)) than that of G. salaris, even minute amounts of host cells in the total DNA sample could lead to significant contamination on the NGS read level. To overcome this challenge, we applied an in silico cleaning of the NGS data downstream to sequencing. We adopted a recently proposed strategy for the separation of genomes of symbiotic organisms (Kumar and Blaxter 2011) that is based on differing aggregate properties of parasite and nontarget genomes. The bioinformatic cleaning of the G. salaris assembly was performed aggressively to minimize nontarget contigs in the draft genome data set, and we consider the removal of ∼50% (see supplementary file S1, Section A, Supplementary Material online) of all reads appropriate in the light of the potential sample contamination. An assembly N50 of around the median gene length of an organism is sufficient to expect about 50% of all genes to be uninterruptedly present in a draft (Yandell and Ence 2012)—a simple rule of thumb suggests the median gene length in the genome of G. salaris (estimated as ∼120 Mb) to be about 2.5 kb (interpolated after fig. 1 in Yandell and Ence (2012)). The actual N50 of >18 kb thus suggests an uninterrupted representation of the majority of genes. The gene space in the draft genome of G. salaris was assessed as being roughly 90% complete based on the presence of a set of core genes of varying level of evolutionary conservatism (Parra et al. 2007, 2009). However, it is very likely that the gene space is even more complete because CEGMA tends to underestimate the completeness of divergent genomes. It has thus been suggested earlier that only the most conservative groups of genes should be used as indicators for completeness in such cases (Parra et al. 2009). In line with this reasoning, the two most conservative CEGMA reference gene sets were recovered at a rate of >95% in the draft genome of G. salaris. The 15,488 predicted gene models for G. salaris were well within the range reported for other parasitic flatworms, for example, 10,345 for E. multilocularis (Tsai et al. 2013), 11,325 for E. granulosus (Zheng et al. 2013), 10,852 for S. mansoni (Berriman et al. 2009), and 16,258 for C. sinensis (Wang et al. 2011). Although the published information on general gene statistics for previously sequenced flatworms is slightly ambiguous and rather fragmentary, the results for G. salaris gene models indicated a reduction in average gene length and number of exons per gene when compared with other parasitic flatworms (supplementary file S2, table S3, Supplementary Material online). The average intron size calculated for G. salaris was similar to that previously reported for tapeworms, whereas average protein- and exon length appeared similar across flatworms in general. The prediction of gene models for G. salaris was based on the information available in public databases (see supplementary file S2, table S2, Supplementary Material online) combined with ab initio gene prediction. Although purely ab initio gene predictors are prone to overprediction, MAKER2 appeared relatively robust in respect to false-positive predictions (Holt and Yandell 2011). Whether the set of genes predicted for G. salaris is indeed inflated remains to be clarified by means of transcriptome sequencing and expression studies. However, the largely concordant gene statistics when compared with other parasitic flatworms (see above), and the identification of functional domains and functional annotation in 55.8% and 45.9% of the predicted gene models, respectively, imply the inference of a high-quality set of gene models for G. salaris. In comparison, in the recently released genome of E. granulosus 40.3% of the gene models could be functionally annotated (Zheng et al. 2013).

Phylogenomics of Platyhelminthes

The phylum Platyhelminthes comprises the free-living Turbellaria and the obligate parasitic Monogenea, Cestoda, and Trematoda, the latter three groups forming the Neodermata. Although there was little dispute about the monophyly of Neodermata in the phylum, the phylogenetic relationships within the Neodermata have been discussed for many years. The phylogenomic analyses unambiguously supported the monophyly of the Platyhelminthes and the obligate parasitic Neodermata with high statistical support. This study provides the first genome wide approach to assess the interrelationships of the obligate parasitic flatworms, and within the monophyletic Neodermata all analyses consistently recovered an early divergence of the ectoparasitic Monogenea and a sister group relationship of the endoparasitic Trematoda and Cestoda (more detailed discussion of the IC values can be found in supplementary file S1, Section C, Supplementary Material online). The data therefore soundly reject a sister group relationship between Monogenea and Cestoda, previously united as the Cercomeromorphae (Janicki 1920), and support recent results obtained by analyzing combined ribosomal 18S and 28S data sets (Lockyer et al. 2003), mitochondrial genomes (Park et al. 2007; Perkins et al. 2010), and microRNA complements (Fromm et al. 2013). We cannot comment on a possible paraphyly of the Monogenea in respect to the two main lineages within, the Monopisthocotylea and Polyopisthocotylea (Mollaret et al. 1997; Justine 1998). Nevertheless, the draft genome of the monopisthocotylean G. salaris provides a paramount foundation for future studies targeting this question. The basal position of the Monogenea within the Neodermata implies that the endoparasitism of Cestoda and Trematoda is a monophyletic but derived lifestyle within Platyhelminthes and that the ectoparasitism in Monogenea represents the plesiomorphic state of parasitism in Neodermata. As pointed out by Park et al. (2007), a sister group relationship between Cestoda and Trematoda also suggests that the transition from direct life cycles on a single host (as in Monogenea) to complex life cycles with multiple hosts (as in Cestoda and Trematoda) was a single evolutionary event.

Genomic Features of Obligate Parasitism in Flatworms

With the phylogenetic relationships within Neodermata resolved the draft genome of G. salaris allows for assessing whether recently proposed adaptive genomic traits for flukes and tapeworms (Tsai et al. 2013) are related to the evolution of endoparasitism or represent in fact synapomorphies of the Neodermata. The list of the adaptive genomic features included among others 1) the absence of vasa, 2) a substantially reduced homeobox gene complement, 3) the loss of the piwi subfamily and the emergence of a fluke- and tapeworm-specific subfamily of argonaute proteins, 4) the innovation of a bimodal intron length distribution in tapeworms, 5) an expansion of the Hsp70 family in tapeworms, 6) the absence of essential peroxisome enzymes, and possibly the absence of peroxisomes in general, and 7) the lack of key enzymes for fatty acids synthesis. The ubiquitous stem-cell specific RNA helicase vasa (DDX4) was absent in tapeworms and flukes. Instead two copies of the structurally very similar PL10 (DDX3) gene were found in both lineages, and it was speculated that a duplication of PL10 (DDX3) in free-living flatworms facilitated a functional takeover of vasa by PL10, followed by a subsequent loss of the then functionally redundant vasa gene in the common ancestor of tapeworms and flukes (Tsai et al. 2013). Both vasa as well as the parasite-specific PL10 have been reported for the monogenean Neobenedenia girellae (Ohashi et al. 2007), an ectoparasite of marine fish, which, like G. salaris, belongs to the Monopisthocotylea. However, in G. salaris we found only one copy of the parasitic flatworm-specific PL10 protein. Vasa was absent, and the loss of the gene is thus not a specific feature of tapeworms and flukes. Whether PL10 has functionally taken over for vasa in G. salaris remains to be tested, but it is noteworthy that knock-down experiments in N. girellae indicated a more important role of PL10 in germ cell formation and fertilization than vasa (Ohashi et al. 2007). The reason why two monopisthocotylean monogeneans differ in this respect is unclear but may reflect the suggested paraphyly of the group (Perkins et al. 2010). The homeodomain complement of invertebrates is very variable. Recently substantial expansions were reported in the lophotrochozoans H. robusta (Annelida, Hirudinea), Capitella telata (Annelida, Polychaeta), and L. gigantea (Mollusca, Gastropoda) with 181, 121, and 111 homeodomain-containing proteins, respectively (Simakov et al. 2013). In contrast, a shared loss of 24 homeobox gene families in flukes and tapeworms, and an additional loss of 10 further families unique to tapeworms, when comparing the respective homeodomain complements to a set of 96 homeobox gene families expected for the most recent common ancestor of the Bilateria, were reported (Tsai et al. 2013). A similar reduction in the homeodomain-containing gene complement was confirmed for G. salaris. The data imply that the majority of homeodomain gene losses must have occurred early in the evolution of Neodermata. There was, however, also an indication of a partly convergent history of homeobox gene family losses in the three neodermatan lineages (fig. 4). Although direct experimental evidence is still lacking, the substantial loss of homeodomain genes may be an adaptation to an obligate parasitic lifestyle. The piwi gene subfamily was also reported lost in cestodes and trematodes. Along with the gain of a specific argonaute subfamily, these have been proposed as tapeworm- and fluke-specific adaptations to parasitism (referred to as group 4 argonaute clade by Tsai et al. 2013). However, the piwi gene subfamily was absent also from the draft genome of G. salaris and we conclude therefore that the loss of this particular gene subfamily is a further synapomorphy of Neodermata. In addition, genes belonging to the fluke- and tapeworm-specific group 4 argonaute clade (Tsai et al. 2013) were also present in the genome of G. salaris. As reported earlier (Zheng 2013), we confirmed a S. mediterranea argonaute protein clustering within this clade (supplementary file S1, fig. S9, Supplementary Material online), and thus conclude that this represents a flatworm-specific expansion, rather than a phenomenon restricted to endoparasitic neodermatans. The loss of piwi in Neodermata raises of course many questions with respect to the gene’s canonical functions. Piwi and argonaute proteins are essential for maintaining genome integrity in stem cells in a process referred to as piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway; in short they repress the mobilization of transposable elements (TEs). The question how flatworms keep up genome integrity without piwi and vasa was addressed recently (Skinner et al. 2014). The authors suggested that parasitic platyhelminths may have evolved a germline, stem cell-specific endogenous, noncanonical siRNA pathway for TE silencing that took over the piRNA pathway (Skinner et al. 2014). Intron lengths in eukaryotes usually vary within a broad range. However, the length distribution is frequently characterized by at least one distinct mode commonly below 100 bp: These putative optima for minimal intron length vary between species. Despite the occurrence of such microintron modes, the average intron length is usually substantially higher, for example, 663 in E. multilocularis (Tsai et al. 2013), 1,411 in Drosophila melanogaster, and 372 in C. elegans (Yu et al. 2002). Yu et al. (2002) argued that such minimal introns may enhance the rate at which messenger RNA is exported from the cell nucleus. A bimodal intron length distribution was earlier suggested as an evolutionary innovation, that is, a newly gained genomic trait, in tapeworms (Tsai et al. 2013), and the authors speculated about modifications of the splicing machinery and/or the nucleus export machinery as being causal adaptations for this phenomenon. However, a bimodal distribution was also found in G. salaris with modes at ∼32 and ∼58 bp, respectively (supplementary file S1, Section D and fig. S10, Supplementary Material online), indicating that this feature is more common than previously suggested. Although the mode positions vary between the species, we found evidence for congruence between G. salaris and E. multilocularis gene models in respect to the gene composition in their modes. Gyrodactylus salaris gene models containing introns falling either into the short (2,232) or the long intron length modes (2,199) were more likely to be orthologous to E. multilocularis gene models containing the corresponding short/long mode introns (1,793 and 2,156, respectively) than expected if gene models were randomly distributed in the two species (see supplementary file S1, Section D for more details, Supplementary Material online). In G. salaries, we furthermore found remarkable differences in the number of short/long mode introns depending on their ordinal position within the gene models. Although the short mode introns are most prevalent at intron positions 1 and 2 of the gene models, the long mode introns are more evenly distributed with respect to ordinal position, but become dominant in introns of ordinal position ≥3 (see supplementary file S1, fig. S12, Supplementary Material online). However, average intron length in G. salaris gene models was found to significantly decrease with ordinal position (see supplementary file S1, fig. S11, Supplementary Material online). Such a negative correlation between intron length and intron ordinal position was reported earlier for a range of organisms (Marais et al. 2005; Gazave et al. 2007; Zhang and Edwards 2012). For primates and Drosophila, it has furthermore been reported that levels of evolutionary constraint vary across classes of introns of different length. Although longer introns appeared more divergent in primates (Gazave et al. 2007), there was a negative correlation between intron length and the level of divergence in Drosophila (Haddrill et al. 2005). Whether or not intron length in G. salaris is correlated with evolutionary constraints needs to be addressed in future studies. Such more comprehensive studies may also investigate whether the bimodal intron length distribution and the biased occurrence of short and long mode introns with respect to their ordinal position are adaptive. In this context, it also needs to be assessed whether the bimodal intron length distribution is a synapomorphy of Neodermata, a hypothesis that currently implies a secondary loss of this genomic trait in Trematoda as observed for S. mansoni (Tsai et al. 2013) (see also supplementary file S1, Section D and fig. S10, Supplementary Material online). Peroxisomes are largely ubiquitous organelles in eukaryotes involved in a variety of metabolic processes and essential in fatty acid—and antioxidant metabolism (Lazarow and Fujiki 1985; Schluter et al. 2007). The absence of many genes associated with peroxisomes including four unequivocal peroxisome marker proteins (Schluter et al. 2006) led to the conclusion that tapeworms and flukes may lack peroxisomes (Tsai et al. 2013), a feature also reported for the Apicomplexan parasites Plasmodium falciparum, P. yoelii, Cryptosporidium parvum, Toxoplasma gondii, and Theileria parva (Schluter et al. 2006, 2007). Our results indicate the absence of peroxisomes also in G. salaris and confirm the findings for endoparasitic flatworms, whereas the detection of all four marker proteins in S. mediterranea, H. robusta, L. gigantea, and C. elegans, respectively, denotes the presence of functional peroxisomes in the latter species. The inability to synthesize fatty acids de novo has been previously reported for tapeworms (Tsai et al. 2013) and flukes (Berriman et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2011) as several key enzymes were lacking, and only a few proteins involved in fatty acid precursor production were detected. It was therefore proposed that endoparasitic flatworms scavenge essential fatty acids from their hosts, and the high expression of fatty acid binding proteins (Tsai et al. 2013) seemed in line with the hypothesis. However, a similar strategy might also be adopted by the ectoparasitic G. salaris. The genomic data indicate that the loss of peroxisomes and the substantial reduction in the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway are characteristic for an adaptive strategy to the obligate parasitic lifestyle of Neodermata. Further studies will be needed to test this hypothesis and to unravel the underlying biochemical details. The reductions in specific genes/gene families described above are in line with the more general observation that a large number of expected bilaterian gene models are absent in Neodermata (fig. 3). Although such comparisons rely on many assumptions and may in addition suffer from a somewhat uncertain definition of the set of expected gene models, the losses of genes in G. salaris, as well as in tapeworms and flukes, appeared much higher than in other bilaterian lineages. A similar loss of expected loci has recently been reported for conserved microRNAs (Fromm et al. 2013). Whether or not the loss of genes correlates with the loss of further specific biochemical pathways, such as the fatty acid biosynthesis, or represents a genome-wide trend needs to be addressed in more detail in future studies. However, this study identified a large number of genomic traits shared in obligate parasitic flatworms in spite of the obvious ecological differences of ecto- and endoparasitic lifestyles. These traits are thus likely to have arisen as an adaptation to parasitism, already in the common ancestor of neodermatan flatworms. The high-quality draft genome of G. salaris facilitates now to include also a representative of the Monogenea in future comparative genomics studies addressing important biological questions such as the genetic basis for ecto- and endoparasitic lifestyles as well as the direct (single-host) and the complex (multiple-hosts) lifecycles represented in the Monogenea and the Trematoda+Cestoda sistergroup, respectively.

Impact of the G. salaris Genome

Notably, G. salaris is a notorious parasite of Atlantic salmon and other European salmonids and is frequently referred to as “the Salmon killer.” The parasite causes significant ecological and economic damage in infected watercourses. In recent years, substantial effort has been directed toward an understanding of strain-specific pathogenicity and transmission behavior in G. salaris (reviewed in Bakke et al. 2007). However, most studies have relied on intergenic ribosomal spacers and/or mitochondrial genes as molecular markers (Hansen et al. 2003, 2007; Meinila et al. 2004), which have proven insufficient for resolving these issues, and the lack of diagnostic markers thus remains a major limitation in G. salaris strain identification and characterization. The provided draft genome of G. salaris can now facilitate the development of diagnostic markers, and provides a platform for future investigations of the genomic basis of the varying pathogenicity, host specificity, and -preference of various strains of G. salaris. In general, the first monogenean reference genome is expected to enhance future studies on the genomics of host–parasite interactions and speciation in the highly diverse monogenean flatworms, and will provide a platform for the development of drug-based control strategies specifically targeting essential biochemical functions in monogenean parasites. The gene models presented in this study may also allow the identification of “speciation genes,” that is, genes that retain reproductive isolation (Wu and Ting 2004) after rapid evolution following the initial utilization of a new host species. Host switching is assumed to play a major role in the diversification of monogenean species (Huyse and Volckaert 2005) and other parasitic organisms in general (Sorenson et al. 2003).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary files S1–S5 are available at Genome Biology and Evolution online (http://www.gbe.oxfordjournals.org/).
  75 in total

1.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life.

Authors:  Casey W Dunn; Andreas Hejnol; David Q Matus; Kevin Pang; William E Browne; Stephen A Smith; Elaine Seaver; Greg W Rouse; Matthias Obst; Gregory D Edgecombe; Martin V Sørensen; Steven H D Haddock; Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa; Akiko Okusu; Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen; Ward C Wheeler; Mark Q Martindale; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Phylogenetic analysis of the Monogenea and their relationships with Digenea and Eucestoda inferred from 28S rDNA sequences.

Authors:  I Mollaret; B G Jamieson; R D Adlard; A Hugall; G Lecointre; C Chombard; J L Justine
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  PhyloBayes MPI: phylogenetic reconstruction with infinite mixtures of profiles in a parallel environment.

Authors:  Nicolas Lartillot; Nicolas Rodrigue; Daniel Stubbs; Jacques Richer
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome.

Authors:  Ruiqiang Li; Wei Fan; Geng Tian; Hongmei Zhu; Lin He; Jing Cai; Quanfei Huang; Qingle Cai; Bo Li; Yinqi Bai; Zhihe Zhang; Yaping Zhang; Wen Wang; Jun Li; Fuwen Wei; Heng Li; Min Jian; Jianwen Li; Zhaolei Zhang; Rasmus Nielsen; Dawei Li; Wanjun Gu; Zhentao Yang; Zhaoling Xuan; Oliver A Ryder; Frederick Chi-Ching Leung; Yan Zhou; Jianjun Cao; Xiao Sun; Yonggui Fu; Xiaodong Fang; Xiaosen Guo; Bo Wang; Rong Hou; Fujun Shen; Bo Mu; Peixiang Ni; Runmao Lin; Wubin Qian; Guodong Wang; Chang Yu; Wenhui Nie; Jinhuan Wang; Zhigang Wu; Huiqing Liang; Jiumeng Min; Qi Wu; Shifeng Cheng; Jue Ruan; Mingwei Wang; Zhongbin Shi; Ming Wen; Binghang Liu; Xiaoli Ren; Huisong Zheng; Dong Dong; Kathleen Cook; Gao Shan; Hao Zhang; Carolin Kosiol; Xueying Xie; Zuhong Lu; Hancheng Zheng; Yingrui Li; Cynthia C Steiner; Tommy Tsan-Yuk Lam; Siyuan Lin; Qinghui Zhang; Guoqing Li; Jing Tian; Timing Gong; Hongde Liu; Dejin Zhang; Lin Fang; Chen Ye; Juanbin Zhang; Wenbo Hu; Anlong Xu; Yuanyuan Ren; Guojie Zhang; Michael W Bruford; Qibin Li; Lijia Ma; Yiran Guo; Na An; Yujie Hu; Yang Zheng; Yongyong Shi; Zhiqiang Li; Qing Liu; Yanling Chen; Jing Zhao; Ning Qu; Shancen Zhao; Feng Tian; Xiaoling Wang; Haiyin Wang; Lizhi Xu; Xiao Liu; Tomas Vinar; Yajun Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shiping Liu; Hemin Zhang; Desheng Li; Yan Huang; Xia Wang; Guohua Yang; Zhi Jiang; Junyi Wang; Nan Qin; Li Li; Jingxiang Li; Lars Bolund; Karsten Kristiansen; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Maynard Olson; Xiuqing Zhang; Songgang Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Initial steps of speciation by geographic isolation and host switch in salmonid pathogen Gyrodactylus salaris (Monogenea: Gyrodactylidae).

Authors:  Maria Meinilä; Jussi Kuusela; Marek S Zietara; Jaakko Lumme
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 3.981

7.  The evolution of intron size in amniotes: a role for powered flight?

Authors:  Qu Zhang; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  InterProScan: protein domains identifier.

Authors:  E Quevillon; V Silventoinen; S Pillai; N Harte; N Mulder; R Apweiler; R Lopez
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler.

Authors:  Ruibang Luo; Binghang Liu; Yinlong Xie; Zhenyu Li; Weihua Huang; Jianying Yuan; Guangzhu He; Yanxiang Chen; Qi Pan; Yunjie Liu; Jingbo Tang; Gengxiong Wu; Hao Zhang; Yujian Shi; Yong Liu; Chang Yu; Bo Wang; Yao Lu; Changlei Han; David W Cheung; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shaoliang Peng; Zhu Xiaoqian; Guangming Liu; Xiangke Liao; Yingrui Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Jun Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  SmedGD: the Schmidtea mediterranea genome database.

Authors:  Sofia M C Robb; Eric Ross; Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary Adaptations of Parasitic Flatworms to Different Oxygen Tensions.

Authors:  José de Jesús Martínez-González; Alberto Guevara-Flores; Irene Patricia Del Arenal Mena
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Cloning, purification, kinetic and anion inhibition studies of a recombinant β-carbonic anhydrase from the Atlantic salmon parasite platyhelminth Gyrodactylus salaris.

Authors:  Ashok Aspatwar; Harlan Barker; Heidi Aisala; Ksenia Zueva; Marianne Kuuslahti; Martti Tolvanen; Craig R Primmer; Jaakko Lumme; Alessandro Bonardi; Amit Tripathi; Seppo Parkkila; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.756

3.  Complete mitochondrial genomes and nuclear ribosomal RNA operons of two species of Diplostomum (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda): a molecular resource for taxonomy and molecular epidemiology of important fish pathogens.

Authors:  Jan Brabec; Aneta Kostadinova; Tomáš Scholz; D Timothy J Littlewood
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  A transcriptomic-phylogenomic analysis of the evolutionary relationships of flatworms.

Authors:  Bernhard Egger; François Lapraz; Bartłomiej Tomiczek; Steven Müller; Christophe Dessimoz; Johannes Girstmair; Nives Škunca; Kate A Rawlinson; Christopher B Cameron; Elena Beli; M Antonio Todaro; Mehrez Gammoudi; Carolina Noreña; Maximilian J Telford
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Lost and Found: Piwi and Argonaute Pathways in Flatworms.

Authors:  Santiago Fontenla; Gabriel Rinaldi; Jose F Tort
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 6.  What helminth genomes have taught us about parasite evolution.

Authors:  Magdalena Zarowiecki; Matt Berriman
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.234

7.  Nuclear genomic signals of the 'microturbellarian' roots of platyhelminth evolutionary innovation.

Authors:  Christopher E Laumer; Andreas Hejnol; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Evolutionary loss of peroxisomes--not limited to parasites.

Authors:  Vojtěch Žárský; Jan Tachezy
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.540

9.  Comparative genomics reveals adaptive evolution of Asian tapeworm in switching to a new intermediate host.

Authors:  Shuai Wang; Sen Wang; Yingfeng Luo; Lihua Xiao; Xuenong Luo; Shenghan Gao; Yongxi Dou; Huangkai Zhang; Aijiang Guo; Qingshu Meng; Junling Hou; Bing Zhang; Shaohua Zhang; Meng Yang; Xuelian Meng; Hailiang Mei; Hui Li; Zilong He; Xueliang Zhu; Xinyu Tan; Xing-Quan Zhu; Jun Yu; Jianping Cai; Guan Zhu; Songnian Hu; Xuepeng Cai
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Shedding light on the expansion and diversification of the Cdc48 protein family during the rise of the eukaryotic cell.

Authors:  Nickias Kienle; Tobias H Kloepper; Dirk Fasshauer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.