Literature DB >> 24731991

Emerging role of SGT1 as a regulator of NB-LRR-receptor nucleocytoplasmic partitioning.

Rafal Hoser1, Malgorzata Lichocka1, Marek Zurczak1, Jacek Hennig1, Magdalena Krzymowska1.   

Abstract

Plant nucleotide-binding (NB) and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) receptors mediate effector-triggered immunity. Two major classes of NB-LRR proteins are involved in this process, namely, toll-interleukin receptor (TIR)-NB-LRR and coiled coil (CC)-NB-LRR proteins. Recent reports show that some of the TIR-NB-LRRs and CC-NB-LRRs localize to the cytoplasm and nucleus. Equilibrium between these pools is required for full resistance, suggesting tight regulation of nucleocytoplasmic receptor shuttling. We recently showed that SGT1, a protein that controls NB-LRR receptor stability and activity, facilitates nuclear import of N protein, which is a TIR-NB-LRR receptor. In this addendum, we show that the subcellular localization of Rx, a CC-NB-LRR protein, reflects the positions of SGT1 ectopic variants in the cell. This suggests that SGT1 might have a general role in maintaining the nucleocytoplasmic balance of NB-LRR receptors. We discuss these results in light of differences in the N and Rx systems of effector-triggered immunity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  N; NB-LRR; Rx; SGT1; nucleocytoplasmic shuttling; plant disease resistance

Year:  2014        PMID: 24731991      PMCID: PMC4091561     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Signal Behav        ISSN: 1559-2316


Plants have evolved multiple defense mechanisms against viruses that interfere with the infection process at several key stages. Potato plants carrying Rx, which encodes CC-NB-LRR type R protein, establish an extreme resistance (ER) to potato virus X (PVX) and severely attenuate virus multiplication. In resistant tobacco plants, tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) multiplies in inoculated cells and moves intercellularly before triggering a hypersensitive response (HR) mediated by N protein. The function and stability of both Rx and N depend on the activity of a chaperone complex containing SGT1,, (Table 1). We recently showed that localization of SGT1 exclusively in the nucleus shifted the cytoplasmic N protein pool toward the nucleus whereas forced cytoplasmic localization of SGT1 did not reduce nuclear N levels. Previous reports suggested that Rx trafficking might be regulated by SGT1, because SGT1 silencing impaired nuclear Rx localization. This might be explained by decreased Rx stability in the absence of SGT1., However no significant reduction in steady-state levels of GFP-Rx or 4HA-GFP-Rx was observed in SGT1-silenced plants compared with that in controls. We have observed that GFP-like tags may stabilize protein constructs expressed in planta. Alternatively, SGT1 might affect the conformation or act directly on translocation of Rx.

Table 1. Summary of properties of two NB-LRR receptors that mediate resistance to viruses. TIR-NB-LRR, toll-interleukin receptor–nucleotide-binding–leucine-rich repeat; CC-NB-LRR, coiled coil–nucleotide-binding–leucine-rich repeat; PVX, potato virus X; TMV, tobacco mosaic virus; HR, hypersensitive response

 NRx
StructureTIR-NB-LRR16CC-NB-LRR17
Chaperone complexInteraction with SGT1-HSP90-RAR1 complex4SGT1 affects stability8NDa for interactionSGT1 affects stability2,3
LocalizationPredominantly nuclear5,18Predominantly cytoplasmic6
Ligand recognitionRecognition of the helicase domain of the TMV replicase (p50) in the cytoplasm or nucleus5,18Recognition of PVX coat protein exclusively in cytoplasm6
SignalingOligomerization,8 conformational change18,19Conformational change,20 oligomerization?
Interaction with transcription factorsSPL621NDa
Other interactors14–3-3,22 NRIP123RanGAP211-13
Forced nuclear localizationWild-type-like HR,5 resistance to TMV not testedNo HR established; compromised resistance to PVX6,11
Forced cytoplasmic localizationNo HR established; resistance to TMV not tested18Wild-type-like HR; slightly compromised resistance to PVX6,11
Domain role in translocationLRR possibly promotes nuclear localization,5,18 YFP-LRR co-localizes with SGT15LRR promotes cytoplasmic localization, CC-domain required for nuclear localization6
SGT1 role in nucleocytoplasmic shuttlingMediates nuclear import5Crucial for nuclear import,6 mediates nuclear import and export (Fig. 1)

a No data available

a No data available To determine the functional relationship between SGT1 and Rx, we transiently expressed SGT1 variants with forced cytoplasmic or nuclear localization and monitored the effects on cellular Rx distribution. First, endogenous SGT1 was silenced in Nicotiana benthamiana plants using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). Subsequently, YFP-Rx was transiently expressed in systemic leaves via bombardment in the presence of AtSGT1b, which carried either nuclear localization signal (NLS; PKKKRKV), nuclear export signal (NES; NELALKLAGLDINK), or mutated versions thereof (nls and nes, respectively). As previously described, NLS-AtSGT1b showed nuclear or nucleocytoplasmic distribution, NES-AtSGT1b was detected predominantly in the cytoplasm, whereas control constructs with the mutated targeting signals in some cells were found in the cytoplasm, but in others were distributed between the nucleus and cytoplasm. The images showed that Rx distribution exactly mirrored that of ectopic AtSGT1b variants (Figure 1A), and this was supported by measurements of relative fluorescence intensities (Figure 1B, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), calculated for cells co-expressing Rx and AtSGT1b, equals 0.8). This suggests that SGT1 facilitates both Rx import into and export from the nucleus, in contrast to that for N protein, which was relocated only toward the nucleus in our experiments. In SGT1-silenced plants, N protein has a nucleocytoplasmic distribution pattern similar to that in wild-type plants, which suggests that SGT1 is not essential for nuclear import of N protein but modulates its trafficking.

Figure 1. AtSGT1b subcellular localization determines nucleocytoplasmic partitioning of Rx. (A) Confocal images of representative N. benthamiana leaf epidermal cells transiently co-expressing YFP-Rx with the indicated ectopic constructs of AtSGT1b fused to CFP. (B) Relative percentage of nuclear fractions of Rx and AtSGT1b (fused to fluorescent proteins) shown as a ratio of the fluorescence intensity in the nucleus (IN) to the total fluorescence intensity in the cell, i. e. intensity in the nucleus plus intensity in the cytoplasm (IC); [IN/(IN+IC)]*100. Average percentage of nuclear fluorescence intensities (± SD) was calculated for yellow or cyan fluorescence in the nucleus and cytoplasm, which was determined using ImageJ software, as described previously. The cells with nuclear, nucleocytoplasmic or cytoplasmic distribution of AtSGT1b are indicated as (n), (n+c) or (c), respectively. Asterisks indicate that the nuclear fraction of Rx is significantly different from the value for Rx in control plants, as established using Student's t test (P < 0.05).

Figure 1. AtSGT1b subcellular localization determines nucleocytoplasmic partitioning of Rx. (A) Confocal images of representative N. benthamiana leaf epidermal cells transiently co-expressing YFP-Rx with the indicated ectopic constructs of AtSGT1b fused to CFP. (B) Relative percentage of nuclear fractions of Rx and AtSGT1b (fused to fluorescent proteins) shown as a ratio of the fluorescence intensity in the nucleus (IN) to the total fluorescence intensity in the cell, i. e. intensity in the nucleus plus intensity in the cytoplasm (IC); [IN/(IN+IC)]*100. Average percentage of nuclear fluorescence intensities (± SD) was calculated for yellow or cyan fluorescence in the nucleus and cytoplasm, which was determined using ImageJ software, as described previously. The cells with nuclear, nucleocytoplasmic or cytoplasmic distribution of AtSGT1b are indicated as (n), (n+c) or (c), respectively. Asterisks indicate that the nuclear fraction of Rx is significantly different from the value for Rx in control plants, as established using Student's t test (P < 0.05). These results may reflect the involvement of Rx and N receptors in distinct resistance responses to viral infection (i.e., ER and HR), in which either the cytosolic or nuclear receptor pool plays a predominant role. Another scenario that cannot be excluded is that, in addition to homodimers composed of full-length N protein, two N forms (e.g., full-length and truncated) encoded by alternatively spliced transcripts, or two truncated forms could associate as other types of hetero- or homo-dimers, respectively. This would add significant system complexity because the different complexes might have different degrees of sensitivity to SGT1 regulation. In summary, Rx and N belong to different classes of plant NB-LRR receptors, and confer distinct types of resistance to viral infection, which include ER and HR, respectively. However, recent results, and Figure 1 show that nucleocytoplasmic receptor shuttling might be regulated in both systems by SGT1 in the LRR-dependent manner (Table 1). This reveals a novel role of SGT1 in effector recognition by NB-LRR receptors, in addition to its role in the control of steady-state levels and activities of the receptors. We proposed that partitioning of the receptors can be finely tuned by phosphorylation of SGT1, which might establish another surveillance system. However, the exact mode of SGT1 action in the translocation process remains to be elucidated. This model does not exclude that the proper equilibrium between nuclear and cytoplasmic receptor pools can be maintained by other means. Multiple levels of regulation might provide specificity for each pathosystem. For example, the observation that the cytoplasmic Rx pool seems to play a dominant role in potato resistance to PVX, is consistent with the fact that cytoplasmic transport of Rx is also controlled by RanGAP2.,, We speculate that during tobacco defense response to TMV, N partitioning might be regulated by dynamic association of the full-length N protein with the truncated N form encoded by alternatively spliced transcripts. Work is underway to test this proposal. Due to space constraints, we have not focused on SGT1 role in the folding and stabilization of client proteins required for their nuclear import. This aspect has been recently discussed in the review by Takken and Goverse.
  21 in total

1.  Molecular chaperone Hsp90 associates with resistance protein N and its signaling proteins SGT1 and Rar1 to modulate an innate immune response in plants.

Authors:  Yule Liu; Tessa Burch-Smith; Michael Schiff; Suhua Feng; Savithramma P Dinesh-Kumar
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  How to build a pathogen detector: structural basis of NB-LRR function.

Authors:  Frank L W Takken; Aska Goverse
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 7.834

Review 3.  Plant-virus interactions.

Authors:  Peter Palukaitis; John P Carr; James E Schoelz
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

4.  Direct interaction between the tobacco mosaic virus helicase domain and the ATP-bound resistance protein, N factor during the hypersensitive response in tobacco plants.

Authors:  Hirokazu Ueda; Yube Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Sano
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  The Rx gene from potato controls separate virus resistance and cell death responses.

Authors:  A Bendahmane; K Kanyuka; D C Baulcombe
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Alternatively spliced N resistance gene transcripts: their possible role in tobacco mosaic virus resistance.

Authors:  S P Dinesh-Kumar; B J Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structural and functional analysis of SGT1 reveals that its interaction with HSP90 is required for the accumulation of Rx, an R protein involved in plant immunity.

Authors:  Marta Botër; Béatrice Amigues; Jack Peart; Christian Breuer; Yasuhiro Kadota; Catarina Casais; Geoffrey Moore; Colin Kleanthous; Francoise Ochsenbein; Ken Shirasu; Raphaël Guerois
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Chloroplastic protein NRIP1 mediates innate immune receptor recognition of a viral effector.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Caplan; Padmavathi Mamillapalli; Tessa M Burch-Smith; Kirk Czymmek; S P Dinesh-Kumar
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Physical association of the NB-LRR resistance protein Rx with a Ran GTPase-activating protein is required for extreme resistance to Potato virus X.

Authors:  Wladimir I L Tameling; David C Baulcombe
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Novel positive regulatory role for the SPL6 transcription factor in the N TIR-NB-LRR receptor-mediated plant innate immunity.

Authors:  Meenu S Padmanabhan; Shisong Ma; Tessa M Burch-Smith; Kirk Czymmek; Peter Huijser; Savithramma P Dinesh-Kumar
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  5 in total

1.  SGT1 is required in PcINF1/SRC2-1 induced pepper defense response by interacting with SRC2-1.

Authors:  Zhi-qin Liu; Yan-yan Liu; Lan-ping Shi; Sheng Yang; Lei Shen; Huan-xin Yu; Rong-zhang Wang; Jia-yu Wen; Qian Tang; Ansar Hussain; Muhammad Ifnan Khan; Jiong Hu; Cai-ling Liu; Yang-wen Zhang; Wei Cheng; Shui-lin He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Sequestration of PRMT1 and Nd1-L mRNA into ALS-linked FUS mutant R521C-positive aggregates contributes to neurite degeneration upon oxidative stress.

Authors:  Mi-Hee Jun; Hyun-Hee Ryu; Yong-Woo Jun; Tongtong Liu; Yan Li; Chae-Seok Lim; Yong-Seok Lee; Bong-Kiun Kaang; Deok-Jin Jang; Jin-A Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Immune Receptors and Co-receptors in Antiviral Innate Immunity in Plants.

Authors:  Bianca C Gouveia; Iara P Calil; João Paulo B Machado; Anésia A Santos; Elizabeth P B Fontes
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  A DNA-Binding Bromodomain-Containing Protein Interacts with and Reduces Rx1-Mediated Immune Response to Potato Virus X.

Authors:  Octavina C A Sukarta; Philip D Townsend; Alexander Llewelyn; Christopher H Dixon; Erik J Slootweg; Lars-Olof Pålsson; Frank L W Takken; Aska Goverse; Martin J Cann
Journal:  Plant Commun       Date:  2020-07-13

5.  Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Specific Activation of Defense Pathways Against Globodera pallida in Gpa2 Resistant Potato Roots.

Authors:  Qi Zheng; André Bertran; Anouk Brand; Casper C van Schaik; Stefan J S van de Ruitenbeek; Geert Smant; Aska Goverse; Mark G Sterken
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.627

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.