Literature DB >> 24731933

ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia in the prehospital setting of a suspected acute coronary syndrome and its association with outcomes.

Nguyen Dang Thang1, Birgitta Wireklint Sundström2, Thomas Karlsson3, Johan Herlitz4, Björn Wilgot Karlson5.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of this study were (a) to determine the prehospital prevalence of electrocardiographic (ECG) signs of acute myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and (b) to describe the relationships between the various ECG patterns and the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and outcomes.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study using data from an interventional trial in acute chest pain patients transported by the emergency medical services. These patients were classified into 3 groups: patients with ECG showing signs of acute myocardial ischemia, patients with ECG showing other abnormal changes (bundle-branch block, pacemaker rhythm, Q-wave or T-wave inversion) and patients without significant pathologic findings. All P values are age-adjusted.
RESULTS: Among 1546 patients, 312 (20%) had ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia. Of them, 57% had a final diagnosis of AMI versus 26% of those with other abnormal ECGs and 12% of those with ECG without significant pathologic findings (P<.0001). In all, 53% of all AMI cases involved patients without ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia. Although ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia predicted heart failure and ventricular tachyarrhythmias both prior to and after hospital admission, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the 3 patient groups (4.3%, 3.7%, and 1.2%, respectively, P=.11).
CONCLUSION: Among patients with a clinical suspicion of AMI in the prehospital setting, the prevalence of ECG signs suggesting AMI was low, as was the ability to identify AMI patients using ECG findings only. We therefore need better instruments in the prehospital triage of patients with acute chest pain.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24731933     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical risk scores for triaging high-risk chest pain patients at the emergency department.

Authors:  Salah S Al-Zaiti; Ziad Faramand; Mohammad O Alrawashdeh; Susan M Sereika; Christian Martin-Gill; Clifton Callaway
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Performance of Prehospital Use of Chest Pain Risk Stratification Tools: The RESCUE Study.

Authors:  Jason P Stopyra; Anna C Snavely; Nicklaus P Ashburn; James O'Neill; Brennan E Paradee; Brian Hehl; Jordan Vorrie; Matthew Wells; R Darrell Nelson; Nella W Hendley; Chadwick D Miller; Simon A Mahler
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Prehospital stratification in acute chest pain patient into high risk and low risk by emergency medical service: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristoffer Wibring; Markus Lingman; Johan Herlitz; Sinan Amin; Angela Bång
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Prehospital management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome : Real world experience reflecting current guidelines.

Authors:  V-S Eckle; S Lehmann; B Drexler
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 0.840

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.