Literature DB >> 24731901

Using a questionnaire among patient, resident doctor and senior supervisor: Are their answers the same?

Ching-Mao Chang1, Wen-Hsiang Wu2, Benjamin Ing-Tiau Kuo3, Tzung-Yan Lee4, Chia-Yu Liu5, Hen-Hong Chang6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to contribute to the development of objective diagnostic standards in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), in order to improve the training of physicians.
METHODS: We devised a questionnaire study to evaluate the accuracy of resident doctors' diagnostic skills by comparing their assessment of patients with those of their senior supervising physician and the patients themselves. We selected 39 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, between November 1, 2008 and June 30, 2012, and had the resident doctors (R), their senior supervisor (S) and their patients (P) fill out questionnaires before treatment (V1), immediately after treatment (V5) and two months after treatment (V6), in order to record their assessments on the patients' condition. The R and S questionnaires covered subjective symptoms, tongue, and pulse, while the P questionnaires only included general symptoms. We then compared the assessment records to determine the level of agreement between them.
RESULTS: The agreements of inquiry during the study for P and S were 0.78 (V1) to 0.84 (V6) and 0.87 (V1) to 0.94 (V6) for R and S, respectively, the agreements between R and S for tongue diagnosis and pulse diagnosis were 0.87 (V1) to 0.90 (V6) and 0.91 (V1) to 0.95 (V6), respectively. All the above agreements improved with time from V1 to V6.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the patient input was feasible and effective and that the questionnaire method provided an objective assessment standard to determine how successfully the resident doctor was trained. Furthermore, it facilitated a training process that could help resident doctors improve their skills.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agreement; Chinese Medicine diagnosis; Objective and standard assessments; Quality of medical practice; Questionnaire; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24731901     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2014.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  1 in total

1.  Validation of a new simple scale to measure symptoms in heart failure from traditional Chinese medicine view: a cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Authors:  Tieh-Cheng Fu; Yi-Chung Lin; Ching-Mao Chang; Wei-Ling Chou; Pei-Hsun Yuan; Min-Hui Liu; Chao-Hung Wang; Juei-Chao Chen; Hen-Hong Chang; Tai-Long Pan
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.659

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.