Literature DB >> 24731084

Baseline series fragrance markers fail to predict contact allergy.

Jack Mann1, John P McFadden, Jonathan M L White, Ian R White, Piu Banerjee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Negative patch test results with fragrance allergy markers in the European baseline series do not always predict a negative reaction to individual fragrance substances.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequencies of positive test reactions to the 26 fragrance substances for which labelling is mandatory in the EU, and how effectively reactions to fragrance markers in the baseline series predict positive reactions to the fragrance substances that are labelled.
METHODS: The records of 1951 eczema patients, routinely tested with the labelled fragrance substances and with an extended European baseline series in 2011 and 2012, were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-one (14.4%) (71.2% females) reacted to one or more allergens from the labelled-fragrance substance series and/or a fragrance marker from the European baseline series. The allergens that were positive with the greatest frequencies were cinnamyl alcohol (48; 2.46%), Evernia furfuracea (44; 2.26%), and isoeugenol (40; 2.05%). Of the 203 patients who reacted to any of the 26 fragrances in the labelled-fragrance substance series, only 117 (57.6%) also reacted to a fragrance marker in the baseline series. One hundred and seven (52.7%) reacted to either fragrance mix I or fragrance mix II, 28 (13.8%) reacted to Myroxylon pereirae, and 13 (6.4%) reacted to hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm that the standard fragrance markers fail to identify patients with contact allergies to the 26 fragrances.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  26 labelled fragrances; allergic contact dermatitis; cross-reactions; fragrance series; fragrances; markers; screens

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24731084     DOI: 10.1111/cod.12171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  4 in total

1.  [The public health issue of allergic contact dermatitis].

Authors:  A Schnuch; V Mahler
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  [Diagnostic workup of fragrance allergy].

Authors:  J Geier; W Uter
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  What is the added value of patch testing with 30 fragrance allergens in addition to the European Baseline series?

Authors:  Rosalie C Krijl; Norbertus A Ipenburg; Sylvie M Franken; Thomas Rustemeyer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.419

4.  Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru): Still worth testing?

Authors:  Fabrizio Guarneri; Monica Corazza; Luca Stingeni; Cataldo Patruno; Maddalena Napolitano; Paolo D M Pigatto; Rosella Gallo; Antonio Cristaudo; Paolo Romita; Annamaria Offidani; Donatella Schena; Nicola Milanesi; Giuseppe Micali; Myriam Zucca; Caterina Foti
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 6.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.