Literature DB >> 24728625

Surgical decision-making for managing complex intracranial aneurysms.

Giuseppe Esposito1, Luca Regli.   

Abstract

The treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms remains a therapeutic challenge. These lesions are frequently not amenable to selective clipping or coiling or other endovascular procedures and surgery still has a predominant role.We illustrate our "surgical decision making" for managing complex intracranial aneurysmal lesions. The best strategy is decided on the basis of pre-operative neuroradiological and intra-operative main determinants such as anatomical location, peri-aneurysmal angioanatomy (branch vessels, critical perforators), broad neck, intraluminal thrombosis, aneurysmal wall atherosclerotic plaques and calcifications, absence of collateral circulation, and previous treatment. The surgical strategy encompasses one of the following treatment possibilities: (1) Direct clip reconstruction; (2) Complete trapping ("classic" or "variant"); (3) Partial trapping (proximal "inflow" or distal "outflow" occlusion). Because the goal of any aneurysm treatment is both (1) aneurysm exclusion and (2) blood flow replacement, cerebral revascularization represents a major management option whenever definitive or temporary vessel occlusion is needed.Cerebral revascularization can therefore be used temporarily as a "protective" bypass, or definitively as a "flow replacement" bypass.Complete and partial trapping strategies are associated with flow "replacement" bypass surgery, to preserve blood flow into the territory supplied by the permanently trapped vessel. The construction of the "ideal" bypass depends on several factors, the most important of which are amount of flow needed, recipient vessel, donor vessel, and microanastomosis technique.The choice between "complete" or "partial" trapping depends on angioanatomical criteria as well. A complete trapping is always favored, as it has the advantage of immediate aneurysm exclusion. When perforating vessels arise from the aneurysmal segment or when the inspection of all the angioanatomy of the aneurysm is considered inadvisable and risky, "partial trapping" strategies are of interest. Partial trapping may consist either of proximal or distal occlusion. We discuss the rationale behind these treatment modalities and illustrate it with a case series of seven patients successfully treated for complex intracranial aneurysmal lesions (location: 1 ICA, 1 ACom, 3 MCA, 2 PICA).

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24728625     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02411-0_1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl        ISSN: 0065-1419


  3 in total

1.  When Is Diagnostic Subtraction Angiography Indicated Before Clipping of Unruptured and Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms? An International Survey of Current Practice.

Authors:  Martina Sebök; Jean-Philippe Dufour; Marco Cenzato; Yasuhiko Kaku; Michihiro Tanaka; Tetsuya Tsukahara; Luca Regli; Giuseppe Esposito
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2021

2.  Endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Mariusz Hofman; Tomasz Jamróz; Izabela Jakutowicz; Paweł Jarski; Wilhelm Masarczyk; Marcin Niedbała; Nikodem Przybyłko; Damian Kocur; Jan Baron
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-26

3.  Diagnostic reliability of the Berlin classification for complex MCA aneurysms-usability in a series of only giant aneurysms.

Authors:  Lars Wessels; Lucius Samo Fekonja; Johannes Achberger; Julius Dengler; Marcus Czabanka; Nils Hecht; Ulf Schneider; Dimitri Tkatschenko; Karl-Michael Schebesch; Nils Ole Schmidt; Dorothee Mielke; Henning Hosch; Oliver Ganslandt; Alexander Gräwe; Bujung Hong; Jan Walter; Erdem Güresir; Philippe Bijlenga; Julien Haemmerli; Nicolai Maldaner; Serge Marbacher; Ville Nurminen; Hynek Zitek; Ruben Dammers; Naoki Kato; Italo Linfante; Maria-Teresa Pedro; Karsten Wrede; Wei-Te Wang; Maria Wostrack; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.216

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.