Vanesa Freire1, Noelia Andollo, Jaime Etxebarria, Raquel Hernáez-Moya, Juan A Durán, María-Celia Morales. 1. *Department of Cell Biology and Histology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain; †Department of R&D, Instituto Clínico-Quirúrgico de Oftalmología, Bilbao, Spain; ‡BioCruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain; and §Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect on corneal wound healing of 3 differently manufactured blood derivatives [autologous serum (AS), platelet-rich plasma, and serum derived from plasma rich in growth factors (s-PRGF)]. METHODS: Scratch wound-healing assays were performed on rabbit primary corneal epithelial cultures and human corneal epithelial cells. Additionally, mechanical debridement of rabbit corneal epithelium was performed. Wound-healing progression was assessed by measuring the denuded areas remaining over time after treatment with each of the 3 blood derivatives or a control treatment. RESULTS: In vitro data show statistically significant differences in the healing process with all the derivatives compared with the control, but 2 of them (AS and s-PRGF) induced markedly faster wound healing. In contrast, although the mean time required to complete in vivo reepithelization was similar to that of AS and s-PRGF treatment, only wounds treated with s-PRGF were significantly smaller in size from 2.5 days onward with respect to the control treatment. CONCLUSIONS: All 3 blood derivatives studied are promoters of corneal reepithelization. However, the corneal wound-healing progresses differently with each derivative, being faster in vitro under AS and s-PRGF treatment and producing in vivo the greatest decrease in wound size under s-PRGF treatment. These findings highlight that the manufacturing process of the blood derivatives may modulate the efficacy of the final product.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect on corneal wound healing of 3 differently manufactured blood derivatives [autologous serum (AS), platelet-rich plasma, and serum derived from plasma rich in growth factors (s-PRGF)]. METHODS: Scratch wound-healing assays were performed on rabbit primary corneal epithelial cultures and human corneal epithelial cells. Additionally, mechanical debridement of rabbit corneal epithelium was performed. Wound-healing progression was assessed by measuring the denuded areas remaining over time after treatment with each of the 3 blood derivatives or a control treatment. RESULTS: In vitro data show statistically significant differences in the healing process with all the derivatives compared with the control, but 2 of them (AS and s-PRGF) induced markedly faster wound healing. In contrast, although the mean time required to complete in vivo reepithelization was similar to that of AS and s-PRGF treatment, only wounds treated with s-PRGF were significantly smaller in size from 2.5 days onward with respect to the control treatment. CONCLUSIONS: All 3 blood derivatives studied are promoters of corneal reepithelization. However, the corneal wound-healing progresses differently with each derivative, being faster in vitro under AS and s-PRGF treatment and producing in vivo the greatest decrease in wound size under s-PRGF treatment. These findings highlight that the manufacturing process of the blood derivatives may modulate the efficacy of the final product.
Authors: Ghasem Yazdanpanah; Zeeshan Haq; Kai Kang; Sayena Jabbehdari; Mark L Rosenblatt; Ali R Djalilian Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Neda Afsharkhamseh; Asadolah Movahedan; Sanaz Gidfar; Michael Huvard; Lisa Wasielewski; Behrad Y Milani; Medi Eslani; Ali R Djalilian Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Eduardo Anitua; María de la Fuente; Francisco Muruzabal; Ronald Mauricio Sánchez-Ávila; Jesús Merayo-Lloves; Mikel Azkargorta; Felix Elortza; Gorka Orive Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carlota Suárez-Barrio; Susana Del Olmo-Aguado; Eva García-Pérez; María de la Fuente; Francisco Muruzabal; Eduardo Anitua; Begoña Baamonde-Arbaiza; Luis Fernández-Vega-Cueto; Luis Fernández-Vega; Jesús Merayo-Lloves Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Ronald M Sánchez-Avila; Jesus Merayo-Lloves; Maria Laura Fernández; Luis Alberto Rodríguez-Gutiérrez; Pedro Pablo Rodríguez-Calvo; Andres Fernández-Vega Cueto; Francisco Muruzabal; Gorka Orive; Eduardo Anitua Journal: Int Med Case Rep J Date: 2018-05-01
Authors: Carlota Suárez-Barrio; Susana Del Olmo-Aguado; Eva García-Pérez; Enol Artime; María de la Fuente; Francisco Muruzabal; Eduardo Anitua; Begoña Baamonde-Arbaiza; Luis Fernández-Vega; Jesús Merayo-Lloves Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 5.923