| Literature DB >> 24727031 |
Ludovico Muzii1, Anthony A Luciano2, Errico Zupi3, Pierluigi Benedetti Panici4.
Abstract
Recent evidence in the literature suggests that surgical excision of the endometrioma wall may reduce ovarian reserve, which may have a negative effect on subsequent reproductive function. However, because of inconsistent results and methodologic flaws of anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) as a marker of ovarian reserve, antral follicle count may be a more accurate noninvasive marker than AMH. Evaluating ovarian reserve using antral follicle count rather than AMH may yield different conclusions insofar as postsurgical damage to the ovary. Surgery should be performed only by experienced surgeons, and the stripping technique currently is still the only one supported by strong scientific evidence. The dual function of surgery, that is, to improve fertility and reduce pain, cannot be minimized or undervalued.Entities:
Keywords: Endometrioma; Endometriosis; Laparoscopy; Ovarian reserve
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24727031 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Minim Invasive Gynecol ISSN: 1553-4650 Impact factor: 4.137