Literature DB >> 24726756

Risk of osteoarthritis secondary to partial or total arthrodesis of the subtalar and midtarsal joints after a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

M Ebalard1, G Le Henaff2, G Sigonney3, R Lopes4, G Kerhousse5, J Brilhault6, D Huten7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this retrospective, multicentre study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes in patients who have undergone partial or total arthrodesis of the subtalar and midtarsal joints. HYPOTHESIS: Secondary osteoarthritis of the adjacent joints can negatively affect the outcomes more than 10 years after these fusion procedures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The outcomes of 72 fusions (total: 22; partial: 50) performed between 1981 and 2002 were evaluated using the Maryland Foot Score (MFS), self-evaluation questionnaire and three weight-bearing X-ray views (Meary's with cerclage wire around heel, lateral and dorsoplantar). The average follow-up was 15 ± 5 years (range 10-31).
RESULTS: There were two deep infections that resolved after lavage and antibiotics therapy. There were 21 early complications (10 complex regional pain syndrome, 7 delayed wound healing, 2 superficial infections, 2 venous thrombosis) that all resolved. There were five cases of non-union (6.9%) that healed after being re-operated. After five years, secondary osteoarthritis led to the fusion being extended to the tibotalar joint (1 case) and midtarsal joint (1 case). At the last follow-up, the average MFS was 71.5 (range 25-100). Patient deemed the result as either excellent (10%), very good (9%), good (55%), poor (19%) or bad (7%). Pain at the last follow-up was present in 84% of cases. The rear-foot was normally aligned in 45% of cases, varus aligned in 22% and valgus aligned in 33%. The MFS was significantly better in patients with normal alignment. Patients with neurological foot disorders had significantly more preoperative (80% cavovarus) and postoperative foot deformity (P<0.05). At the last follow-up, the rate of secondary osteoarthritis in the surrounding joints was elevated: 73% tibiotalar, 58.3% subtalar, 65.8% talonavicular, 53.5% calaneocuboid. The presence of osteoarthritis was not correlated with pain or lower MFS. However there was significantly more pain at last follow-up than at 12 months postoperative and two fusions were required in patients with secondary osteoarthritis.
CONCLUSION: Although partial or total arthrodesis of the subtalar and midtarsal joints is a reliable procedure, it induces secondary osteoarthritis. Even though it seems to be well tolerated more than 10 years after the initial procedure, this possibility must be discussed with young, active patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degenerative ankle osteoarthritis; Degenerative tarsal osteoarthritis; Subtalar; Talonavicular arthrodesis; Triple arthrodesis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24726756     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  9 in total

1.  [Total ankle arthroplasty with simultaneous subtalar fusion].

Authors:  J Mainzer; P Rippstein
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  How Do Hindfoot Fusions Affect Ankle Biomechanics: A Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Ian D Hutchinson; Josh R Baxter; Susannah Gilbert; MaCalus V Hogan; Jeff Ling; Stuart M Saunders; Hongsheng Wang; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Clinical and Radiological Mid- to Long-term Outcomes Following Ankle Fusion.

Authors:  Ines E Gaedke; Ulrich Wiebking; Padhraig F O'Loughlin; Christian Krettek; Ralph Gaulke
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  The epidemiology of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis in community-dwelling older adults: cross-sectional findings from the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot.

Authors:  Martin J Thomas; George Peat; Trishna Rathod; Michelle Marshall; Andrew Moore; Hylton B Menz; Edward Roddy
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 5.156

5.  Open triple fusion versus TNC arthrodesis in the treatment of Mueller-Weiss disease.

Authors:  Hongtao Zhang; Junkun Li; Yusen Qiao; Jia Yu; Yu Cheng; Yan Liu; Chao Gao; Jiaxin Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Total talar replacement with a novel 3D printed modular prosthesis for tumors.

Authors:  Xiang Fang; Hongyuan Liu; Yan Xiong; Wenli Zhang; Yi Luo; Fan Wu; Yong Zhou; Liuhong Song; Zeping Yu; Chongqi Tu; Hong Duan
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Arthroscopic ankle fusion only has a limited advantage over the open operation if osseous operation type is the same: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Chenggong Wang; Can Xu; Mingqing Li; Hui Li; Long Wang; Da Zhong; Hua Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  Triple Arthrodesis for Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity.

Authors:  Maj Uma E Erard; Maj Andrew J Sheean; Bruce J Sangeorzan
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2019-08-19

9.  The Teramoto distal tibial oblique osteotomy (DTOO): surgical technique and applicability for ankle osteoarthritis with varus deformity.

Authors:  Tsukasa Teramoto; Shota Harada; Motoyuki Takaki; Tomohiko Asahara; Narutaka Kato; Nobuyuki Takenaka; Takasi Matsushita; Yosiaki Makino; Kouitiro Tasiro; Ootuka Kazutaka; Yukinobu Nishi; Kiyoto Kinugsa
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2018-01-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.