Literature DB >> 24726603

The prevalence of nodal upstaging during robotic lung resection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Jennifer L Wilson1, Brian E Louie2, Robert J Cerfolio3, Bernard J Park4, Eric Vallières1, Ralph W Aye1, Ahmed Abdel-Razek4, Ayesha Bryant3, Alexander S Farivar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pathologic nodal upstaging can be considered a surrogate for completeness of nodal evaluation and quality of surgery. We sought to determine the rate of nodal upstaging and disease-free and overall survival with a robotic approach in clinical stage I NSCLC.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with clinical stage I NSCLC after robotic lobectomy or segmentectomy at three centers from 2009 to 2012. Data were collected primarily based on Society of Thoracic Surgeons database elements.
RESULTS: Robotic anatomic lung resection was performed in 302 patients. The majority were right sided (192; 63.6%) and of the upper lobe (192; 63.6%). Most were clinical stage IA (237; 78.5%). Pathologic nodal upstaging occurred in 33 patients (10.9% [pN1 20, 6.6%; pN2 13, 4.3%]). Hilar (pN1) upstaging occurred in 3.5%, 8.6%, and 10.8%, respectively, for cT1a, cT1b, and cT2a tumors. Comparatively, historic hilar upstage rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for cT1a, cT1b, and cT2a were 5.2%, 7.1%, and 5.7%, versus 7.4%, 8.8%, and 11.5%, respectively. Median follow-up was 12.3 months (range, 0 to 49). Forty patients (13.2%) had disease recurrence (local 11, 3.6%; regional 7, 2.3%; distant 22, 7.3%). The 2-year overall survival was 87.6%, and the disease-free survival was 70.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of nodal upstaging for robotic resection appears to be superior to VATS and similar to thoracotomy data when analyzed by clinical T stage. Both disease-free and overall survival were comparable to recent VATS and thoracotomy data. A larger series of matched open, VATS and robotic approaches is necessary.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24726603     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.01.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  54 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Surgery for Thoracic Disease.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Yamashita; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Akinori Iwasaki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 1.520

2.  The association of nodal upstaging with surgical approach and its impact on long-term survival after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mark W Hennon; Luke H DeGraaff; Adrienne Groman; Todd L Demmy; Sai Yendamuri
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Pathologic Upstaging in Patients Undergoing Resection for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Are There Modifiable Predictors?

Authors:  Matthew J Bott; Aalok P Patel; Traves D Crabtree; Graham A Colditz; Daniel Kreisel; A Sasha Krupnick; G Alexander Patterson; Stephen Broderick; Bryan F Meyers; Varun Puri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer: results and operating technique.

Authors:  Giulia Veronesi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Pathological upstaging and treatment strategy of clinical stage I small cell lung cancer following surgery.

Authors:  Hisashi Saji; Tomoyuki Miyazawa; Hideki Marushima; Haruhiko Nakamura
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  A decade of robotics in lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Brian E Louie
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Nodal upstaging evaluation in NSCLC patients treated by robotic lobectomy.

Authors:  Carmelina Zirafa; Vittorio Aprile; Sara Ricciardi; Gaetano Romano; Federico Davini; Ilenia Cavaliere; Greta Alì; Gabriella Fontanini; Franca Melfi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Feichao Bao; Chong Zhang; Yunhai Yang; Zhehao He; Luming Wang; Jian Hu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Triaging early-stage lung cancer patients into non-surgical pathways: who, when, and what?

Authors:  Rameses Sroufe; Feng-Ming Spring Kong
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

10.  Robotic Versus Thoracoscopic Resection for Lung Cancer: Early Results of a New Robotic Program.

Authors:  Benedetto Mungo; Craig M Hooker; Janelle S Y Ho; Stephen C Yang; Richard J Battafarano; Malcolm V Brock; Daniela Molena
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.