Literature DB >> 24726320

Sonocatalytic and sonophotocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine 6G containing wastewaters.

Nileema B Bokhale1, Snehal D Bomble1, Rachana R Dalbhanjan1, Deepika D Mahale1, Shruti P Hinge1, Barnali S Banerjee1, Ashish V Mohod2, Parag R Gogate3.   

Abstract

The present work deals with degradation of aqueous solution of Rhodamine 6G (Rh 6G) using sonocatalytic and sonophotocatalytic treatment schemes based on the use of cupric oxide (CuO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) as the solid catalysts. Experiments have been carried out at the operating capacity of 2 L and constant initial pH of 12.5. The effect of catalyst loading on the sonochemical degradation has been investigated by varying the loading over the range of 1.5-4.5 g/L. It has been observed that the maximum degradation of 52.2% was obtained at an optimum concentration of CuO as 1.5 g/L whereas for TiO2 maximum degradation was observed as 51.2% at a loading of 4 g/L over similar treatment period. Studies with presence of radical scavengers such as methanol (CH3OH) and n-butanol (C4H9OH) indicated lower extents of degradation confirming the dominance of radical mechanism. The combined approach of ultrasound, solid catalyst and scavengers has also been investigated at optimum loadings to simulate real conditions. The optimal solid loading was used for studies involving oxidation using UV irradiations where 26.4% and 28.9% of degradation was achieved at optimal loading of CuO and TiO2, respectively. Studies using combination of UV and US irradiations have also been carried out using the optimal concentration of the catalysts. It has been observed that maximum degradation of 63.3% is achieved using combined US and UV with TiO2 (4 g/L) as the photocatalyst. Overall it can be said that the combined processes give higher extent of degradation as compared to the individual processes based on US or UV irradiations.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COD removal; Intensification; Photocatalysis; Radical scavengers; Rhodamine 6G degradation; Sonolysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24726320     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem        ISSN: 1350-4177            Impact factor:   7.491


  6 in total

Review 1.  Degradation of organic pollutants and microorganisms from wastewater using different dielectric barrier discharge configurations--a critical review.

Authors:  Emile S Massima Mouele; Jimoh O Tijani; Ojo O Fatoba; Leslie F Petrik
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Kinetic modeling and determination role of sono/photo nanocatalyst-generated radical species on degradation of hydroquinone in aqueous solution.

Authors:  Sajad Rahimi; Bita Ayati; Abbas Rezaee
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Photocatalytic Degradation of Aqueous Rhodamine 6G Using Supported TiO2 Catalysts. A Model for the Removal of Organic Contaminants From Aqueous Samples.

Authors:  Eduardo Pino; Cristian Calderón; Francisco Herrera; Gerardo Cifuentes; Gisselle Arteaga
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.221

4.  Photocatalysis, photoinduced enhanced anti-bacterial functions and development of a selective m-tolyl hydrazine sensor based on mixed Ag·NiMn2O4 nanomaterials.

Authors:  Md Abdus Subhan; Pallab Chandra Saha; Md Anwar Hossain; M M Alam; Abdullah M Asiri; Mohammed M Rahman; Mohammad Al-Mamun; Tanjila Parvin Rifat; Topu Raihan; A K Azad
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Aqueous Acetamiprid Degradation Using Combined Ultrasonication and Photocatalysis Under Visible Light.

Authors:  Carolina Sayury Miyashiro; Safia Hamoudi
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Ambient aqueous-phase synthesis of covalent organic frameworks for degradation of organic pollutants.

Authors:  Yaozu Liu; Yujie Wang; Hui Li; Xinyu Guan; Liangkui Zhu; Ming Xue; Yushan Yan; Valentin Valtchev; Shilun Qiu; Qianrong Fang
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 9.825

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.