Literature DB >> 24726295

Coronary and microvascular physiology during intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.

Kalpa De Silva1, Matthew Lumley1, Balrik Kailey1, Jordi Alastruey2, Antoine Guilcher3, Kaleab N Asrress1, Sven Plein4, Michael Marber1, Simon Redwood1, Divaka Perera5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify the effect of coronary autoregulation on myocardial perfusion during intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy.
BACKGROUND: IABP is the most commonly used circulatory support device, although its efficacy in certain scenarios has been questioned. The impact of alterations in microvascular function on IABP efficacy has not previously been evaluated in humans.
METHODS: Thirteen patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction: 34 ± 8%) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were recruited. Simultaneous intracoronary pressure and Doppler-flow measurements were undertaken in the target vessel following percutaneous coronary intervention, during unassisted and IABP-assisted conditions. Coronary autoregulation was modulated by the use of intracoronary adenosine, inducing maximal hyperemia. Wave intensity analysis characterized the coronary wave energies associated with balloon counterpulsation.
RESULTS: Two unique diastolic coronary waves were temporally associated with IABP device use; a forward compression wave and a forward expansion wave caused by inflation and deflation, respectively. During basal conditions, IABP therapy increased distal coronary pressure (82.4 ± 16.1 vs. 88.7 ± 17.8 mm Hg, p = 0.03), as well as microvascular resistance (2.32 ± 0.52 vs. 3.27 ± 0.41 mm Hg cm s(-1), p = 0.001), with no change in average peak velocity (30.6 ± 12.0 vs. 26.6 ± 11.3 cm s(-1), p = 0.59). When autoregulation was disabled, counterpulsation caused an increase in average peak velocity (39.4 ± 10.5 vs. 44.7 ± 17.5 cm s(-1), p = 0.002) that was linearly related with IABP-forward compression wave energy (R(2) = 0.71, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Autoregulation ameliorates the effect of IABP on coronary flow. However, during hyperemia, IABP augments myocardial perfusion, principally due to a diastolic forward compression wave caused by balloon inflation, suggesting IABP would be of greatest benefit when microcirculatory reserve is exhausted.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intra-aortic balloon pump; left ventricular dysfunction; microvascular function; wave intensity analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24726295     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  13 in total

1.  Economic implications of intra-aortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: an analysis from the IABP-SHOCK II-trial.

Authors:  Andreas Schuster; Maggie Faulkner; Uwe Zeymer; Taoufik Ouarrak; Ingo Eitel; Steffen Desch; Gerd Hasenfuß; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Kevin J Morine; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-01

3.  Major influence of a 'smoke and mirrors' effect caused by wave reflection on early diastolic coronary arterial wave intensity.

Authors:  Jonathan P Mynard; Daniel J Penny; Joseph J Smolich
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  IABP: history-evolution-pathophysiology-indications: what we need to know.

Authors:  H Parissis; V Graham; S Lampridis; M Lau; G Hooks; P C Mhandu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Impact of coronary bifurcation morphology on wave propagation.

Authors:  Simone Rivolo; Lucas Hadjilucas; Matthew Sinclair; Pepijn van Horssen; Jeroen van den Wijngaard; Roman Wesolowski; Amedeo Chiribiri; Maria Siebes; Nicolas P Smith; Jack Lee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 6.  Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Matt Ryan; Natalia Briceno; Divaka Perera
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.243

7.  Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived coronary wave intensity analysis.

Authors:  Claire E Raphael; Jennifer Keegan; Kim H Parker; Robin Simpson; Julian Collinson; Vass Vassiliou; Ricardo Wage; Peter Drivas; Stephen Strain; Robert Cooper; Ranil de Silva; Rod H Stables; Carlo Di Mario; Michael Frenneaux; Dudley J Pennell; Justin E Davies; Alun D Hughes; David Firmin; Sanjay K Prasad
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Usefulness of coronary flow reserve measured by transthoracic coronary Doppler ultrasound in the elderly.

Authors:  Danijela Trifunovic; Edina Cenko; Concetta Torromeo; Beatrice Ricci; Michele Schiariti; Marija Zdravkovic; Zorana Vasiljevic; Olivia Manfrini
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 9.  The role of acute circulatory support in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Michele Esposito; Yousef Bader; Robert Pedicini; Catalina Breton; Andrew Mullin; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 10.  Pulmonary Hypertension in Intensive Care Units: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Armin Nowroozpoor; Majid Malekmohammad; Seyyed Reza Seyyedi; Seyed Mohammadreza Hashemian
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2019-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.