Literature DB >> 24726226

Pharmacokinetics of two low-dose levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems and effects on ovulation rate and cervical function: pooled analyses of phase II and III studies.

Dan Apter1, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson2, Brian Hauck3, Kimberly Rosen4, Christian Zurth5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 13.5 mg and LNG-IUS 19.5 mg (total content).
DESIGN: Pooled pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of phase II and III studies.
SETTING: Randomized, open-label, multicenter studies. PATIENT(S): Nulliparous and parous women. INTERVENTION(S): Levonorgestrel intrauterine system 13.5 mg, LNG-IUS 19.5 mg, or LNG-IUS 20 μg/24 h (total content 52 mg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pharmacokinetics of LNG, ovulation rate, cervical function, and endometrium effects. RESULT(S): The in vivo LNG release rate of LNG-IUS 13.5 mg was approximately 14 μg/24 h after 24 days, declining progressively to 5 μg/24 h after 3 years. The average LNG serum concentration over 3 years of use was 74.3 ng/L, 114 ng/L, and 218 ng/L for LNG-IUS 13.5 mg, LNG-IUS 19.5 mg, and LNG-IUS 20 μg/24 h, respectively. All treatments showed very similar progestogenic effects on cervical mucus, with low and similar cervical scores throughout treatment. Ovulation was observed in the majority of women in all groups where assessment was possible, although there was a lower incidence of anovulation with LNG-IUS 13.5 mg and LNG-IUS 19.5 mg compared with LNG-IUS 20 μg/24 h. The progestogenic effect on the endometrium was marked in all three LNG-IUS groups. CONCLUSION(S): Levonorgestrel intrauterine system 13.5 mg and LNG-IUS 19.5 mg result in alower systemic exposure to LNG, lower incidence of anovulation, and similar progestin impact on the endometrium and cervical function compared with LNG-IUS 20 μg/24 h.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24726226     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

Review 1.  Levonorgestrel IUD: is there a long-lasting effect on return to fertility?

Authors:  Erin Dinehart; Ruth B Lathi; Lusine Aghajanova
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Case-based discussion on the implications of exogenous estrogens in hemostasis and thrombosis: the obstetrician's view.

Authors:  Andra H James
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 3.  Recent advances in contraception.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; James Trussell
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 4.  The Double Engines and Single Checkpoint Theory of Endometriosis.

Authors:  Che-Fang Hsu; Aye Aye Khine; Hsuan-Shun Huang; Tang-Yuan Chu
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-14

5.  Pharmacokinetics of the 1.5 mg levonorgestrel emergency contraceptive in women with normal, obese and extremely obese body mass index.

Authors:  Melissa Natavio; Frank Z Stanczyk; Emilie A G Molins; Anita Nelson; William J Jusko
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Bridging progestogens in pregnancy and pregnancy prevention.

Authors:  Elizabeth Micks; Greta B Raglan; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.335

Review 7.  New developments in intrauterine device use: focus on the US.

Authors:  Anita L Nelson; Natasha Massoudi
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-09-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.