Literature DB >> 24726165

Single, remote-magnetic catheter approach for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Thomas Pezawas1, Robin Ristl2, Mariusz Bilinski3, Christoph Schukro3, Herwig Schmidinger3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a single, remote-magnetic catheter navigation system (MNS) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
METHODS: A total of 107 PVI procedures in 71 patients with paroxysmal (32%), persistent (38%) and longstanding-persistent (30%) atrial fibrillation (AF) were analyzed. A wide area circumferential radiofrequency ablation PVI was performed with either an 8mm MNS (first 35 procedures) or an irrigated MNS (last 36 procedures) catheter. Electrical isolation was confirmed with circular pacing/sensing using the MNS catheter and a coronary sinus catheter. Our follow-up strategy in the first year and upon symptoms thereafter was: clinical check plus 12-lead ECG (100%) and 24 h-ECG recordings (76%) at 3 month intervals, trans-telephonic ECG (79%) twice daily and upon symptoms (4 weeks every 3 months), or ECG monitoring via implanted devices (9%).
RESULTS: The mean procedure time at 1st PVI was 247±61 min, and mean fluoroscopy time was 44±18 min. The overall complication rate was 2%. Success rates did not differ at the 1st PVI regarding catheter type (p=0.931) but were dependent on history of AF: patients with paroxysmal AF had the highest success rates of 58% and 29% after 1 and 3 years of follow-up, respectively (p=0.0084).
CONCLUSION: PVI with a single MNS catheter is safe and is associated with short fluoroscopy exposition. Despite a rigorous follow-up strategy success rates favorably compare with recently published data on hand-held PVI. Thus, multipolar catheters or a 2nd trans-septal puncture may not be mandatory.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Magnetic navigation; Pulmonary vein isolation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24726165     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  3 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life changes in patients undergoing repeated catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Thomas Pezawas; Robin Ristl; Christoph Schukro; Herwig Schmidinger
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Impact of catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation on procedural outcomes in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Qi Jin; Steen Pehrson; Peter Karl Jacobsen; Xu Chen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Comparisons of efficacy, safety, and recurrence risk factors of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation catheter ablation using robotic magnetic navigation system.

Authors:  Xiao-Xi Zhao; Ku-Lin Li; Ru-Xing Wang; Jie Zheng; Xiao-Yu Liu; Shi-Peng Dang; Zhi-Ming Yu; Chang-Ying Zhang; Xiang-Jun Yang
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.882

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.