Carmen Dingemann1, Annica Meyer2, Gabriele Kircher3, Thomas M Boemers4, Bernhard Vaske5, Holger Till6, Benno M Ure2. 1. Center of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School and Bult Children's Hospital, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: dingemann.carmen@mh-hannover.de. 2. Center of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School and Bult Children's Hospital, Hannover, Germany. 3. German support group for patients with diseased esophagus "KEKS", Stuttgart, Germany. 4. Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 5. Institute of Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. 6. Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after esophageal atresia (EA) repair is postulated to be good. However, little is known about the long-term results after repair of complex and/or complicated EA regarding HRQoL. We investigated long-term HRQoL after delayed anastomosis, esophageal replacement, major revisions, or multiple dilatations in patients registered in a support group. METHODS: Patients registered in the German patient support group database (KEKS) were enrolled and allocated to subgroups according to surgical treatment and age. HRQoL was evaluated using validated questionnaires (GIQLI, WHO-5, KIDSCREEN27). RESULTS: Complete follow-up (mean 14.5 ± 9.8 years) was available for 90/92 patients. Patients were allocated to subgroups delayed anastomosis (n=28), esophageal replacement (n=27), major revisions (n=15), and multiple dilatations (n=20). Adult patients presented with impaired well-being according to WHO-score and gastrointestinal function (GIQLI). In contrast, HRQoL of children was comparable to controls in most KIDSCREEN27-dimensions. Delayed anastomosis was associated with most-favourable HRQoL. Regarding physical well-being, these children scored significantly better than controls [64.01 ± 10.40 vs. 52.36 ± 8.73;p=0.0011], children after replacement [51.40 ± 5.70;p=0.008], revisions [52.04 ± 6.97;p=0.026], and multiple dilatations [50.22 ± 9.67,p=0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL after complex and/or complicated EA is excellent in children registered in a patient support group. In adults, disease-specific symptoms negatively affect HRQoL. Our data indicate that saving the esophagus may achieve the best HRQoL.
BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after esophageal atresia (EA) repair is postulated to be good. However, little is known about the long-term results after repair of complex and/or complicated EA regarding HRQoL. We investigated long-term HRQoL after delayed anastomosis, esophageal replacement, major revisions, or multiple dilatations in patients registered in a support group. METHODS:Patients registered in the German patient support group database (KEKS) were enrolled and allocated to subgroups according to surgical treatment and age. HRQoL was evaluated using validated questionnaires (GIQLI, WHO-5, KIDSCREEN27). RESULTS: Complete follow-up (mean 14.5 ± 9.8 years) was available for 90/92 patients. Patients were allocated to subgroups delayed anastomosis (n=28), esophageal replacement (n=27), major revisions (n=15), and multiple dilatations (n=20). Adult patients presented with impaired well-being according to WHO-score and gastrointestinal function (GIQLI). In contrast, HRQoL of children was comparable to controls in most KIDSCREEN27-dimensions. Delayed anastomosis was associated with most-favourable HRQoL. Regarding physical well-being, these children scored significantly better than controls [64.01 ± 10.40 vs. 52.36 ± 8.73;p=0.0011], children after replacement [51.40 ± 5.70;p=0.008], revisions [52.04 ± 6.97;p=0.026], and multiple dilatations [50.22 ± 9.67,p=0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL after complex and/or complicated EA is excellent in children registered in a patient support group. In adults, disease-specific symptoms negatively affect HRQoL. Our data indicate that saving the esophagus may achieve the best HRQoL.
Authors: Florian Friedmacher; Birgit Kroneis; Andrea Huber-Zeyringer; Peter Schober; Holger Till; Hugo Sauer; Michael E Höllwarth Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Michaela Dellenmark-Blom; John Eric Chaplin; Vladimir Gatzinsky; Linus Jönsson; Kate Abrahamson Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: John E Chaplin; Julia H Quitmann; Michaela Dellenmark-Blom; Kate Abrahamsson; Jens Dingemann; Stefanie Witt; Carmen Dingemann; Linus Jönsson; Vladimir Gatzinsky; Monika Bullinger; Benno M Ure Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2022-05-21 Impact factor: 4.303
Authors: Kiera Roberts; Jonathan Karpelowsky; Dominic A Fitzgerald; Soundappan S V Soundappan Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 1.827