Literature DB >> 24726118

Pediatric surgery on YouTube™: is the truth out there?

Stephanie K Bezner1, Erica I Hodgman1, Diana L Diesen1, Joshua T Clayton1, Robert K Minkes1, Jacob C Langer2, Li Ern Chen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: In 2000, we described the variability of pediatric surgical information on the Internet. Since then, online videos have become an increasingly popular medium for education and personal expression. The purpose of this study was to examine the content and quality of videos related to pediatric surgical diagnoses on the Internet.
METHODS: YouTube™ was searched for videos on gastroschisis, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, pediatric inguinal hernia, and pectus excavatum. The first 40 English language videos for each diagnosis were reviewed for owner and audience characteristics, content and quality.
RESULTS: A small majority of videos were made by medical professionals (50.63%, vs. 41.25% by lay persons and 8.13% by fundraising organizations). Eighty percent of videos were intended for a lay audience. Videos by medical professionals were more accurate and complete than those posted by lay persons.
CONCLUSIONS: The YouTube™ videos varied significantly in content and quality. Videos by lay persons often focused on the emotional aspect of the diagnosis and clinical course. Videos by members of the medical profession tended to be more complete and accurate. These findings underscore the continued need for high quality pediatric surgical information on the Internet for patients and their families.
© 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internet; Pediatric surgery; YouTube™

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24726118     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  9 in total

1.  Lingual orthodontic treatment: A YouTube™ video analysis.

Authors:  Yağmur Lena; Furkan Dindaroğlu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  The Quality of Open-Access Video-Based Orthopaedic Instructional Content for the Shoulder Physical Exam is Inconsistent.

Authors:  Ekaterina Urch; Samuel A Taylor; Elizabeth Cody; Peter D Fabricant; Jayme C Burket; Stephen J O'Brien; David M Dines; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-06-29

3.  Exploring Visualisation for Embryology Education: A Twenty-First-Century Perspective.

Authors:  Eiman M Abdel Meguid; Jane C Holland; Iain D Keenan; Priti Mishall
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  YouTube is the Most Frequently Used Educational Video Source for Surgical Preparation.

Authors:  Allison K Rapp; Michael G Healy; Mary E Charlton; Jerrod N Keith; Marcy E Rosenbaum; Muneera R Kapadia
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Thyroid surgery YouTube videos: estimating quality by surgeon characteristics and view rate.

Authors:  Courtney Brooke Shires; Caleb D Wilson; Merry Sebelik
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-06

6.  Estimating the quality of YouTube videos on pulmonary lobectomy.

Authors:  Zixuan Chen; Hongyu Zhu; Weijun Zhao; Haixie Guo; Chengwei Zhou; Jianfei Shen; Minhua Ye
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  "How I whiten my teeth": YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening.

Authors:  Huseyin Simsek; Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk; Ebru Cetinkaya; Mubin Tural; Murside Seda Koseoglu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Evaluation of YouTube videos for patients' education on periradicular surgery.

Authors:  Ahmed Jamleh; Mohannad Nassar; Hamad Alissa; Abdulmohsen Alfadley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of Korean-Language COVID-19-Related Medical Information on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study.

Authors:  Hana Moon; Geon Ho Lee
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.