Fiona Webster1, Samantha Bremner2, Joel Katz3, Judy Watt-Watson4, Deborah Kennedy5, Mona Sawhney6, Colin McCartney7. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. 2. Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University Hamilton, ON. 3. Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON. 4. Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. 5. Holland Orthopaedic and Arthritic Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON. 6. Acute Pain Service, North York General Hospital Toronto, ON. 7. Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ontario has introduced strategies over the past decade to reduce wait times and length of stay and improve access to physiotherapy for orthopaedic and other patients. The aim of this study is to explore patients' experiences of joint replacement care during a significant system change in their care setting. METHODS: A secondary analysis was done on semi-structured qualitative interviews that were conducted in 2009 with 12 individuals who had undergone at least two hip or knee replacements five years apart at a specialized orthopaedic centre in Ontario, Canada. Interview transcripts were coded and then organized into themes. RESULTS: Although the original study aimed to capture participants' experiences with changes in anaesthetic technique between their first and second joint replacements, the participants described several unrelated differences in the care they received during this period. For example, participants had difficulty obtaining a referral to an orthopaedic surgeon from their family physician. They also noted that the hospital stay and in-hospital physiotherapy they received were shorter after the second joint replacement surgery. They identified guidance from physiotherapists as an important component of their recovery, but sometimes had difficulty arranging physiotherapy after hospital discharge following their most recent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The changes described between the first and second joint replacements provide the participants' perspective on the impact of policy changes on wait times, reduced lengths of hospital stay and physiotherapy access. The impact of these policy changes, often made in an attempt to improve access to care, had an unintended and detrimental effect on participants' perceptions and experiences of the quality of care provided.
BACKGROUND: Ontario has introduced strategies over the past decade to reduce wait times and length of stay and improve access to physiotherapy for orthopaedic and other patients. The aim of this study is to explore patients' experiences of joint replacement care during a significant system change in their care setting. METHODS: A secondary analysis was done on semi-structured qualitative interviews that were conducted in 2009 with 12 individuals who had undergone at least two hip or knee replacements five years apart at a specialized orthopaedic centre in Ontario, Canada. Interview transcripts were coded and then organized into themes. RESULTS: Although the original study aimed to capture participants' experiences with changes in anaesthetic technique between their first and second joint replacements, the participants described several unrelated differences in the care they received during this period. For example, participants had difficulty obtaining a referral to an orthopaedic surgeon from their family physician. They also noted that the hospital stay and in-hospital physiotherapy they received were shorter after the second joint replacement surgery. They identified guidance from physiotherapists as an important component of their recovery, but sometimes had difficulty arranging physiotherapy after hospital discharge following their most recent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The changes described between the first and second joint replacements provide the participants' perspective on the impact of policy changes on wait times, reduced lengths of hospital stay and physiotherapy access. The impact of these policy changes, often made in an attempt to improve access to care, had an unintended and detrimental effect on participants' perceptions and experiences of the quality of care provided.
Authors: Samantha Jones; Mustafa Alnaib; Michail Kokkinakis; Michael Wilkinson; Alan St Clair Gibson; Deiary Kader Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Gillian R Hunt; George M Hall; Burra V S Murthy; Seamus O'Brien; David Beverland; Martin C Lynch; Peter Salmon Journal: Health Expect Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Ann F Jacobson; Rodney P Myerscough; Kirsten Delambo; Eileen Fleming; Amy M Huddleston; Natalie Bright; Joseph D Varley Journal: Am J Nurs Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.220
Authors: Mahmoud I Nazzal; Khaldoon H Bashaireh; Mahmoud A Alomari; Mohammad S Nazzal; Mikhled F Maayah; Mohammad Mesmar Journal: Int J Rehabil Res Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.479
Authors: Mayilee Canizares; Crystal MacKay; Aileen M Davis; Nizar Mahomed; Elizabeth M Badley Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 2.655