Xuesong Chen1, Yingying Cong1, Lihua Pan2, Ying Jiang1, Qingwei Meng1, Lichun Sun1, Hui Pang1, Yanbin Zhao1, Xiaoqun Dong3, Li Cai4. 1. Department of Internal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China. 2. Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College, Jining, Shandong Province, China. 3. Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, The University of Rhode Island, Pharmacy Building, 7 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI 02881, USA. Electronic address: xiaoqun_dong@mail.uri.edu. 4. Department of Internal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China. Electronic address: caiwenxin76@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The group of luminal (Her2 negative) is distinguished from other subtypes of breast cancer. We aimed to produce a prognostic index specific for luminal (Her2 negative) subtype breast cancer that could assist clinical treatment. METHODS: The test set comprised 406 consecutive luminal (Her2 negative) breast cancer patients. The relationship of 11 clinicopathologic factors including survivin with the 5-year disease-free survival was analyzed. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, TNM stage, surgery, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and survivin expression were prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, tumor size [HR (95% CI): 1.98 (1.12-3.49), p=0.019], the number of lymph node metastasis [HR (95% CI): 1.75 (1.33-2.29), p<0.0001] and the expression of progesterone receptor [HR (95% CI): 0.58 (0.36-0.95), p=0.029] can independently predict prognosis. Prognostic index (PI) was calculated as 0.68×tumor size+0.56×the number of lymph node metastasis-0.54×PR. According to the PI, patients were categorized into three groups: low, middle, and high risk group with the 5-year disease-free survival rates of 91.91%, 84.97% and 70.47%, respectively (P<0.001). In the validation set, the luminal prognostic index (LPI) remained significant. CONCLUSION: The LPI may be a useful tool for evaluating the outcome of patients with luminal (Her-2 negative) breast cancer.
PURPOSE: The group of luminal (Her2 negative) is distinguished from other subtypes of breast cancer. We aimed to produce a prognostic index specific for luminal (Her2 negative) subtype breast cancer that could assist clinical treatment. METHODS: The test set comprised 406 consecutive luminal (Her2 negative) breast cancerpatients. The relationship of 11 clinicopathologic factors including survivin with the 5-year disease-free survival was analyzed. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, TNM stage, surgery, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and survivin expression were prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, tumor size [HR (95% CI): 1.98 (1.12-3.49), p=0.019], the number of lymph node metastasis [HR (95% CI): 1.75 (1.33-2.29), p<0.0001] and the expression of progesterone receptor [HR (95% CI): 0.58 (0.36-0.95), p=0.029] can independently predict prognosis. Prognostic index (PI) was calculated as 0.68×tumor size+0.56×the number of lymph node metastasis-0.54×PR. According to the PI, patients were categorized into three groups: low, middle, and high risk group with the 5-year disease-free survival rates of 91.91%, 84.97% and 70.47%, respectively (P<0.001). In the validation set, the luminal prognostic index (LPI) remained significant. CONCLUSION: The LPI may be a useful tool for evaluating the outcome of patients with luminal (Her-2 negative) breast cancer.